Classic

Amazon-Photo

Node Classification PyG dataset page ↗PyG ↗

Structure

1Graphs
7,650Nodes
119,081Edges
8Classes
745Node Feature Dim
0.8365Homophily

Coverage

800Results
1Variants
139Papers
Node classification on one co-purchase graph, predicting each product’s category from review-derived features and product links. Evaluated by Accuracy.

Dataset details

Task

Amazon co-purchase graph (Photo) node classification. The primary catalog metric is Accuracy.

Data

Amazon co-purchase graph (Photo) node classification.

Features

The representation follows the cited PyG loader or benchmark release. Node and edge fields are dataset-specific; preprocessing, graph direction, and any feature normalization must be kept fixed when reproducing a result.

Splits and evaluation

The catalog records these protocols or variants: Standard split. Evaluation uses Accuracy (higher is better). Exact masks or folds must come from the cited release.

Quirks and pitfalls

The same short dataset name is used for incompatible processed artifacts and split protocols. Report the loader/version, directedness, feature preprocessing, and exact masks; transductive results should not be described as inductive.

Sources

SOTA Progression

new SOTA matches SOTA at that time other proposed result other baseline result

Leaderboard

#ModelAccuracy ↑ACCAUROCAccuracy (micro F1 per L1108)Macro-F1Micro-F1Normalized AUAC (percentage)ROC-AUCRecallPaper
1
GraphTARIF
0.9703
————————
2
GAT
0.9669 ± 0.0014
————————
3
GAT+T
0.9660 ± 0.0007
————————
4
Polynormer
0.9657 ± 0.0023
————————
5
SAGE+T
0.9651 ± 0.0023
————————
6
Polynormer-r
0.9646 ± 0.0026
————————
7
SAGE
0.9643 ± 0.0027
————————
8
GCN
0.9632 ± 0.0008
————————
9
GCN+TS
0.9621 ± 0.0011
————————
10
NTFormer
0.9617 ± 0.0029
————————
11
NAGphormer
0.9614 ± 0.0016
————————
12
Polynormer
0.9611 ± 0.0023
————————
13
Polynormer-v1
0.9611 ± 0.0023
————————
14
Polynormer-v2
0.9609 ± 0.0030
————————
15
NAGphormer-LGTL
0.9601 ± 0.0015
————————
16
CNA (TransformerConv)
0.9596 ± 0.0029
————————
17
VecFormer
0.9584 ± 0.0041
————————
18
VCR-Graphormer-LGTL
0.9582 ± 0.0017
————————
19
Specformer
0.9580 ± 0.0026
————————
20
GRAND
0.9579 ± 0.0059
————————
21
APPNP
0.9573 ± 0.0012
————————
22
CGT
0.9573 ± 0.0084
————————
23
LaplaceGNN
0.9570 ± 0.0015
————————
24
SignGT
0.9568 ± 0.0036
————————
25
PieCoN
0.9565 ± 0.0034
————————
26
GIST
0.9561 ± 0.0023
————————
27
GWN-fa
0.9561 ± 0.0053
————————
28
GIRL
0.9560 ± 0.0010
————————
29
SGFormer
0.9558 ± 0.0036
————————
30
VCR-Graphormer
0.9553 ± 0.0023
————————
31
GrokFormer
0.9552 ± 0.0052
————————
32
OGFormer
0.9550 ± 0.0000
————————
33
NAGphormer
0.9549 ± 0.0011
————————
34
GPRGNN
0.9549 ± 0.0014
————————
35
H2GCN
0.9548 ± 0.0043
————————
36
Polynormer
0.9544 ± 0.0024
————————
37
JacobiConv
0.9543 ± 0.0023
————————
38
GNSN
0.9543 ± 0.0126
————————
39
SGT
0.9537 ± 0.0044
————————
40
Exphormer
0.9535 ± 0.0022
————————
41
GAT+GPL
0.9535 ± 0.0014
————————
42
HiGCN
0.9533 ± 0.0037
————————
43
ADC
0.9533 ± 0.0027
————————
44
SPEXPHORMER
0.9533 ± 0.0049
————————
45
GWN-sym
0.9531 ± 0.0065
————————
46
Specformer
0.9529 ± 0.0030
————————
47
Exphormer (LapPE)
0.9527 ± 0.0042
————————
48
NodeFormer
0.9527 ± 0.0022
————————
49
FusedGAT+GPL
0.9527 ± 0.0030
————————
50
EXPHORMER + GCN
0.9527 ± 0.0042
————————
SOTA performance set a new SOTA at the time matched the SOTA at the time