Graph regression on molecular graphs, predicting measured aqueous solubility. Atom and bond types form the graph input. Evaluated by MAE.

Dataset details

Task

Aqueous solubility regression on 9,982 molecular graphs from the LRGB paper. The primary catalog metric is MAE.

Data

Aqueous solubility regression on 9,982 molecular graphs from the LRGB paper.

Features

The representation follows the cited PyG loader or benchmark release. Node and edge fields are dataset-specific; preprocessing, graph direction, and any feature normalization must be kept fixed when reproducing a result.

Splits and evaluation

The catalog records these protocols or variants: Standard split. Evaluation uses MAE (lower is better). Exact masks or folds must come from the cited release.

Quirks and pitfalls

The same short dataset name is used for incompatible processed artifacts and split protocols. Report the loader/version, directedness, feature preprocessing, and exact masks; transductive results should not be described as inductive.

Sources

SOTA Progression

new SOTA matches SOTA at that time other proposed result other baseline result

Leaderboard

#ModelMAE ↓Paper
1
Ours(100K)
0.9200 ± 0.0090
2
GatedGCN-PE/E(500K)
0.9960 ± 0.0080
3
GatedGCN-E-PE
0.9960 ± 0.0080
4
3WLGNN-E
1.0420 ± 0.0640
5
GAPE + RWPE
1.0690 ± 0.0090
6
GAPE
1.0850 ± 0.0090
7
RWPE
1.1200 ± 0.0040
8
3WLGNN
1.1540 ± 0.0500
9
R-LAP
1.2300 ± 0.0070
10
GAT
1.2400 ± 0.0110
11
SignNet
1.2600 ± 0.0060
12
ABS-LAP
1.2700 ± 0.0090
13
GCN
1.2800 ± 0.0110
14
GatedGCN-E
1.2950 ± 0.0160
15
LAP
1.3100 ± 0.0060
16
LaplacianPE
1.3100 ± 0.0390
17
GatedGCN
1.3520 ± 0.0340
18
GCN
1.3720 ± 0.0200
19
MoNet
1.3950 ± 0.0270
20
GraphSAGE
1.4310 ± 0.0100
21
GAT
1.4410 ± 0.0230
22
vanilla GCN
1.4830 ± 0.0140
23
None
1.7100 ± 0.0500
24
MLP
1.7440 ± 0.0160
25
GIN
1.8940 ± 0.0240
26
RingGNN-E
3.7690 ± 1.0120
27
RingGNN
20.2640 ± 7.5490
SOTA performance set a new SOTA at the time matched the SOTA at the time