Power Flow Benchmarks

Case 2

Graph Regression

Structure

750,000Graphs
7Node Feature Dim
3Edge Feature Dim

Coverage

Joint node-and-edge regression Jointly predict bus active/reactive power and voltage magnitude plus directional branch active/reactive flows on a real provincial grid. Evaluated by Accuracy.

Dataset details

Task

Jointly predict bus active/reactive power and voltage magnitude plus directional branch active/reactive flows on a real provincial grid. Accuracy requires every voltage and branch-error threshold to be met for a sample.

Data

Case II uses 366 days of operational data from an unnamed Chinese provincial grid. The first 300 days generate 500,000 training and 100,000 test samples; the remaining 66 days yield about 150,000 generalization samples with 300–690 buses.

Features

Nodes represent buses with electrical quantities and edges represent transmission elements with network parameters. Inputs, targets, units, slack-bus treatment, and feasibility status follow the benchmark case generator.

Splits and evaluation

The catalog records these protocols or variants: Standard split. Evaluation uses Accuracy (higher is better). Exact masks or folds must come from the cited release.

Quirks and pitfalls

Only converged, feasible operating points should be compared under the documented policy. Per-unit conventions, topology changes, solver tolerances, and bus-type handling can silently alter labels; these cases do not establish transfer to real grids.

Sources

SOTA Progression

new SOTA matches SOTA at that time other proposed result other baseline result

Leaderboard

#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
RMGL
0.9928
Jan 2026 Jan '26
2
MGL
0.9607
Jan 2026 Jan '26
3
GLP
0.5072
Jan 2026 Jan '26
4
GLR
0.4709
Jan 2026 Jan '26
SOTA performance set a new SOTA at the time matched the SOTA at the time