Power Flow Benchmarks
Case 2
Structure
750,000Graphs
7Node Feature Dim
3Edge Feature Dim
Coverage
Joint node-and-edge regression Jointly predict bus active/reactive power and voltage magnitude plus directional branch active/reactive flows on a real provincial grid. Evaluated by Accuracy.
Dataset details
Task
Jointly predict bus active/reactive power and voltage magnitude plus directional branch active/reactive flows on a real provincial grid. Accuracy requires every voltage and branch-error threshold to be met for a sample.
Data
Case II uses 366 days of operational data from an unnamed Chinese provincial grid. The first 300 days generate 500,000 training and 100,000 test samples; the remaining 66 days yield about 150,000 generalization samples with 300–690 buses.
Features
Nodes represent buses with electrical quantities and edges represent transmission elements with network parameters. Inputs, targets, units, slack-bus treatment, and feasibility status follow the benchmark case generator.
Splits and evaluation
The catalog records these protocols or variants: Standard split. Evaluation uses Accuracy (higher is better). Exact masks or folds must come from the cited release.
Quirks and pitfalls
Only converged, feasible operating points should be compared under the documented policy. Per-unit conventions, topology changes, solver tolerances, and bus-type handling can silently alter labels; these cases do not establish transfer to real grids.
Sources
SOTA Progression
new SOTA
matches SOTA at that time
other proposed result
other baseline result
Leaderboard
| # | Model | Accuracy ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RMGL | 0.9928 | Power Flow Benchmarks
no code |
| 2 | MGL | 0.9607 | Power Flow Benchmarks
no code |
| 3 | GLP | 0.5072 | Power Flow Benchmarks
no code |
| 4 | GLR | 0.4709 | Power Flow Benchmarks
no code |
SOTA performance
set a new SOTA at the time
matched the SOTA at the time