Classic

CiteSeer

Node Classification PyG dataset page ↗PyG ↗

Structure

1Graphs
3,327Nodes
4,732Edges
6Classes
3703Node Feature Dim
0.7062Homophily

Coverage

1245Results
1Variants
188Papers
Node classification on one citation graph, predicting each paper’s research topic from bag-of-words features and citation links. Evaluated by Accuracy.

Dataset details

Task

Citation network node classification (6 classes). The primary catalog metric is Accuracy.

Data

Citation network node classification (6 classes).

Features

The representation follows the cited PyG loader or benchmark release. Node and edge fields are dataset-specific; preprocessing, graph direction, and any feature normalization must be kept fixed when reproducing a result.

Splits and evaluation

The catalog records these protocols or variants: Planetoid split. Evaluation uses Accuracy (higher is better). Exact masks or folds must come from the cited release.

Quirks and pitfalls

The same short dataset name is used for incompatible processed artifacts and split protocols. Report the loader/version, directedness, feature preprocessing, and exact masks; transductive results should not be described as inductive.

Sources

Yang et al. 2016 fixed split.

SOTA Progression

new SOTA matches SOTA at that time other proposed result other baseline result

Leaderboard

#ModelAccuracy ↑AUCAccuracy (micro F1 per L1108)F1F1 ScoreF1-macroF1-microInstabilityNMIUnfaithfulnessPaper
1
CNA
0.9575 ± 0.0058
—————————
2
IS-GIB
0.9390 ± 0.0187
—————————
3
EERM
0.9112 ± 0.0145
—————————
4
Size-inv
0.9089 ± 0.0215
—————————
5
OOD-GNN
0.9069 ± 0.0173
—————————
6
SR-GNN
0.9047 ± 0.0156
—————————
7
GOOD
0.9045 ± 0.0156
—————————
8
Ord. GNN
0.9015
—————————
9
Policy-GNN
0.8970 ± 0.0210
—————————
10
DIR
0.8956 ± 0.0201
—————————
11
IRM
0.8945 ± 0.0208
—————————
12
FLODE
0.8902
—————————
13
ERM
0.8874 ± 0.0127
—————————
14
GroupDRO
0.8794 ± 0.0285
—————————
15
GNN-LF
0.8366 ± 0.0006
—————————
16
GNN-HF
0.8356 ± 0.0010
—————————
17
ACMII-Snowball-2
0.8207 ± 0.0104
—————————
18
NTFormer
0.8161 ± 0.0075
—————————
19
GMT-lin
0.8152 ± 0.0075
—————————
20
APPNP
0.8142 ± 0.0026
—————————
21
TADropEdge-Division
0.8140
—————————
22
TADropEdge-CDF
0.8140
—————————
23
TADropEdge-GCN
0.8140
—————————
24
ACM-Snowball-3
0.8130 ± 0.0100
—————————
25
DropEdge
0.8130
—————————
26
APPNP+DropEdge
0.8130
—————————
27
SunnyGNN
0.8128 ± 0.0075
—————————
28
TADropEdge-Cutoff
0.8120
—————————
29
GSAT
0.8114 ± 0.0051
—————————
30
N2N-TAPS-4 (JL)
0.8106 ± 0.0011
—————————
31
STAGNN
0.8105 ± 0.0082
—————————
32
GPRGNN
0.8102 ± 0.0071
—————————
33
N2N
0.8090 ± 0.0021
—————————
34
N2N-TAPS-5 (JL)
0.8084 ± 0.0011
—————————
35
GCNII
0.8076 ± 0.0030
—————————
36
GMT-sam
0.8076 ± 0.0097
—————————
37
TADropEdge-JKNet
0.8070
—————————
38
N2N-TAPS-3 (JL)
0.8064 ± 0.0014
—————————
39
NAGphormer
0.8057 ± 0.0072
—————————
40
TADropEdge-IncepGCN
0.8050
—————————
41
SSP
0.8050 ± 0.0010
—————————
42
APPNP
0.8050
—————————
43
N2N-TAPS-2 (JL)
0.8034 ± 0.0006
—————————
44
N2N-TAPS-1 (JL)
0.8024 ± 0.0013
—————————
45
Gophormer
0.8023 ± 0.0009
—————————
46
DropEdge
0.8020
—————————
47
JKNet+DropEdge
0.8020
—————————
48
GAT
0.8013 ± 0.0062
—————————
49
NE-ASGCN
0.8010 ± 0.0022
—————————
50
NE-SAGE
0.8000 ± 0.0078
—————————
SOTA performance set a new SOTA at the time matched the SOTA at the time