Classic

Coauthor-Physics

Node Classification PyG dataset page ↗PyG ↗

Structure

1Graphs
34,493Nodes
247,962Edges
5Classes
8415Node Feature Dim
0.9153Homophily

Coverage

374Results
1Variants
59Papers
Node classification on one coauthorship graph, predicting each author’s physics field from paper-keyword features. Evaluated by Accuracy.

Dataset details

Task

Co-authorship graph (Physics) node classification from the “Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluation” paper. The primary catalog metric is Accuracy.

Data

Co-authorship graph (Physics) node classification from the “Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluation” paper.

Features

The representation follows the cited PyG loader or benchmark release. Node and edge fields are dataset-specific; preprocessing, graph direction, and any feature normalization must be kept fixed when reproducing a result.

Splits and evaluation

The catalog records these protocols or variants: Standard split. Evaluation uses Accuracy (higher is better). Exact masks or folds must come from the cited release.

Quirks and pitfalls

The same short dataset name is used for incompatible processed artifacts and split protocols. Report the loader/version, directedness, feature preprocessing, and exact masks; transductive results should not be described as inductive.

Sources

SOTA Progression

new SOTA matches SOTA at that time other proposed result other baseline result

Leaderboard

#ModelAccuracy ↑ACCF1-MacroF1-MicroNormalized AUACNormalized AUAC (percentage)Prediction Acc.Paper
1
GrokFormer
0.9831 ± 0.0018
——————
2
PolyFormer
0.9808 ± 0.0027
——————
3
SGFormer
0.9796 ± 0.0081
——————
4
HopGNN
0.9786 ± 0.0016
——————
5
NAGphormer
0.9785 ± 0.0026
——————
6
GAT
0.9782 ± 0.0028
——————
7
GPRGNN
0.9777 ± 0.0015
——————
8
Specformer
0.9775 ± 0.0053
——————
9
GCN
0.9774 ± 0.0035
——————
10
HiGCN
0.9765 ± 0.0035
——————
11
H2GCN
0.9764 ± 0.0050
——————
12
CPGNN
0.9761 ± 0.0048
——————
13
GraphGPS
0.9760 ± 0.0005
——————
14
JacobiConv
0.9756 ± 0.0028
——————
15
GloGNN
0.9754 ± 0.0053
——————
16
GCN+TS
0.9744 ± 0.0014
——————
17
SAGE
0.9739 ± 0.0018
——————
18
GraphTARIF
0.9739 ± 0.0007
——————
19
FAGCN
0.9737 ± 0.0033
——————
20
BernNet
0.9736 ± 0.0030
——————
21
NAGphormer
0.9734 ± 0.0003
——————
22
GAT
0.9732 ± 0.0006
——————
23
OEPG
0.9730 ± 0.0010
——————
24
Polynormer-r
0.9727 ± 0.0008
——————
25
GAT+T
0.9726 ± 0.0003
——————
26
ChebyNet
0.9725 ± 0.0078
——————
27
GPRGNN
0.9725 ± 0.0013
——————
28
SAGE+T
0.9723 ± 0.0000
——————
29
Polynormer
0.9722 ± 0.0006
——————
30
Exphormer
0.9720 ± 0.0010
——————
31
VecFormer
0.9717 ± 0.0024
——————
32
EXPHORMER + GCN
0.9716 ± 0.0013
——————
33
GraphGPS
0.9712 ± 0.0019
——————
34
ACM-GCN
0.9709 ± 0.0020
——————
35
GGCN
0.9707 ± 0.0005
——————
36
OrderedGNN
0.9700 ± 0.0008
——————
37
DCM
0.9699 ± 0.0044
——————
38
Exphormer
0.9689 ± 0.0009
——————
39
Polynormer
0.9689 ± 0.0006
——————
40
NAGphormer
0.9686 ± 0.0021
——————
41
GPRGNN
0.9685 ± 0.0008
——————
42
GraphFM-NFT
0.9677 ± 0.0012
——————
43
LaplaceGNN
0.9672 ± 0.0011
——————
44
GraphGPS
0.9671 ± 0.0015
——————
45
SPEXPHORMER
0.9670 ± 0.0005
——————
46
GraphFM-MFT
0.9664 ± 0.0017
——————
47
GAT
0.9663 ± 0.0025
——————
48
SGFormer
0.9663 ± 0.0014
——————
49
GIRL
0.9660 ± 0.0000
——————
50
DIFFormer
0.9660 ± 0.0018
——————
SOTA performance set a new SOTA at the time matched the SOTA at the time