LRGB
COCO-SP
Structure
123,286Graphs
477Nodes
2,694Edges
81Classes
14Node Feature Dim
2Edge Feature Dim
Coverage
104Results
1Variants
15Papers
- Graph Cascades: Contagion-Based Mesoscopic Rewiring for Structure-Aware Graph Machine Learning Graph Cascades: Contagion-Based Mesoscopic Rewiring for Structure-Aware Graph Machine Learning
- ALINC: Active Learning for Inductive Node Classification via Graph Sampling ALINC: Active Learning for Inductive Node Classification via Graph Sampling
- Beyond Oversquashing: Understanding Signal Propagation in GNNs Via Observables Beyond Oversquashing: Understanding Signal Propagation in GNNs Via Observables
- GCCM: Enhancing Generative Graph Prediction via Contrastive Consistency Model GCCM: Enhancing Generative Graph Prediction via Contrastive Consistency Model
- FloydNet: A Learning Paradigm for Global Relational Reasoning FloydNet: A Learning Paradigm for Global Relational Reasoning
- TMLR 2025: Chimera: State Space Models Beyond Sequences Chimera: State Space Models Beyond Sequences TMLR 2025
- KDD 2024: Benchmarking Positional Encodings for GNNs and Graph Transformers Benchmarking Positional Encodings for GNNs and Graph Transformers KDD 2024
- ICLR 2024: When Graph Neural Networks Meet Dynamic Mode Decomposition When Graph Neural Networks Meet Dynamic Mode Decomposition ICLR 2024
- AAAI 2024: A Scalable and Effective Alternative to Graph Transformers A Scalable and Effective Alternative to Graph Transformers AAAI 2024
- ICML 2024: Graph External Attention Enhanced Transformer Graph External Attention Enhanced Transformer ICML 2024
- ICLR 2024: Distinguished In Uniform: Self Attention Vs. Virtual Nodes Distinguished In Uniform: Self Attention Vs. Virtual Nodes ICLR 2024
- KDD 2024: Graph Mamba: Towards Learning on Graphs with State Space Models Graph Mamba: Towards Learning on Graphs with State Space Models KDD 2024
- Mitigating Over-Smoothing and Over-Squashing using Augmentations of Forman-Ricci Curvature Mitigating Over-Smoothing and Over-Squashing using Augmentations of Forman-Ricci Curvature
- TMLR 2023: Where Did the Gap Go? Reassessing the Long-Range Graph Benchmark Where Did the Gap Go? Reassessing the Long-Range Graph Benchmark TMLR 2023
- NeurIPS 2022: LRGB LRGB NeurIPS 2022
81-class node classification Predict one of 81 semantic labels for each superpixel node. Nodes contain 12 per-region RGB statistics—mean, standard deviation, maximum, and minimum per channel—and two center-of-mass coordinates. Evaluated by F1.
Dataset details
Task
Predict one of 81 semantic labels for each superpixel node. The assigned target is the pixel annotation at the mean coordinate of the superpixel region.
Data
The benchmark converts 123,286 MS COCO images into graphs. Its default construction uses SLIC superpixels with compactness 30 and at most 500 regions per image, joined by edges when the regions share a boundary.
Features
Nodes contain 12 per-region RGB statistics—mean, standard deviation, maximum, and minimum per channel—and two center-of-mass coordinates. Region-boundary edges contain the mean Sobel response and the number of boundary pixels.
Splits and evaluation
The original COCO validation set becomes a 5,000-image test set; 5,000 images sampled from the original training set form validation, leaving 113,286 for training. The official score is class-weighted macro F1 over superpixel nodes.
Quirks and pitfalls
The task differs from original COCO instance segmentation and inherits approximation error from superpixelization and center-pixel labels. Optional LRGB variants change SLIC compactness or replace region-boundary edges with coordinate- or feature-based 8-nearest-neighbor graphs; results across these graph constructions are not directly comparable.
Sources
SOTA Progression
new SOTA
matches SOTA at that time
other proposed result
other baseline result
Leaderboard
| # | Model | F1 ↑ | AULC | F1-macro | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FloydNet | 0.4901 | — | — | |
| 2 | CRaWl | 0.4588
±
0.0079 | — | — | |
| 3 | GPS | 0.4440
±
0.0065 | — | — | |
| 4 | NeuralWalker | 0.4398
±
0.0033 | — | — | |
| 5 | Schrödinger | 0.4259
±
0.0034 | — | — | |
| 6 | Lie UniGCN | 0.4005
±
0.0067 | — | — | |
| 7 | Chimera | 0.3977
±
0.0160 | — | — | |
| 8 | GMN | 0.3974
±
0.0101 | — | — | |
| 9 | Graph Mamba | 0.3974
±
0.0101 | — | — | |
| 10 | Exphormer | 0.3960
±
0.0027 | — | — | |
| 11 | Graph-Mamba | 0.3960 | — | — | |
| 12 | GEAET | 0.3895 | — | — | |
| 13 | GPS + Mamba | 0.3895
±
0.0125 | — | — | |
| 14 | GraphGPS + RWSE | 0.3891
±
0.0033 | — | — | |
| 15 | GPS | 0.3884
±
0.0055 | — | — | |
| 16 | GraphGPS+Transformer | 0.3884
±
0.0055 | — | — | |
| 17 | GatedGCN | 0.3880
±
0.0040 | — | — | |
| 18 | GraphGPS + RWDIFF | 0.3873
±
0.0024 | — | — | |
| 19 | GraphGPS + ESLapPE | 0.3866
±
0.0017 | — | — | |
| 20 | GraphGPS+LapPE | 0.3859
±
0.0016 | — | — | |
| 21 | GCCM | 0.3856
±
0.0021 | — | — | |
| 22 | GPS-PCL | 0.3816
±
0.0058 | — | — | |
| 23 | GraphGPS + (noPE) | 0.3799
±
0.0056 | — | — | |
| 24 | GPS | 0.3774 | — | — | |
| 25 | UniGCN | 0.3516
±
0.0070 | — | — | |
| 26 | Exphormer + ESLapPE | 0.3485
±
0.0011 | — | — | |
| 27 | Exphormer + RWSE | 0.3485
±
0.0011 | — | — | |
| 28 | Exphormer + LapPE | 0.3471
±
0.0028 | — | — | |
| 29 | Exphormer | 0.3455
±
0.0009 | — | — | |
| 30 | GPS | 0.3453
±
0.0056 | — | — | |
| 31 | Exphormer + noPE | 0.3445
±
0.0052 | — | — | |
| 32 | Exphormer | 0.3430
±
0.0008 | — | — | |
| 33 | Exphormer + RWDIFF | 0.3417
±
0.0006 | — | — | |
| 34 | GPS w/ Transformer | 0.3412
±
0.0044 | — | — | |
| 35 | GECO | 0.3320
±
0.0032 | — | — | |
| 36 | DRew | 0.3314
±
0.0024 | — | — | |
| 37 | GatedGCN-VN | 0.3244
±
0.0025 | — | — | |
| 38 | GatedGCN | 0.2922
±
0.0018 | — | — | |
| 39 | Gated-GCN | 0.2922
±
0.0018 | — | — | |
| 40 | GINE | 0.2718
±
0.0054 | — | — | |
| 41 | GatedGCN | 0.2641
±
0.0045 | — | — | |
| 42 | GPS + BigBird | 0.2622
±
0.0008 | — | — | |
| 43 | Transformer+LapPE | 0.2618
±
0.0031 | — | — | |
| 44 | SAN | 0.2592
±
0.0158 | — | — | |
| 45 | GatedGCN+RWSE | 0.2574
±
0.0034 | — | — | |
| 46 | SAN+RWSE | 0.2434
±
0.0156 | — | — | |
| 47 | GRIT + RWDIFF | 0.2128
±
0.0008 | — | — | |
| 48 | GINE | 0.2125
±
0.0009 | — | — | |
| 49 | GRIT + RWSE | 0.2114
±
0.0009 | — | — | |
| 50 | GRIT + LapPE | 0.2112
±
0.0005 | — | — |
SOTA performance
set a new SOTA at the time
matched the SOTA at the time