TU Dortmund

COLLAB

Graph Classification PyG dataset page ↗PyG ↗

Structure

5,000Graphs
75Nodes
2,458Edges
3Classes

Coverage

479Results
1Variants
91Papers
3-class graph classification Graph classification of scientific collaboration networks (3 classes). Uses the released node/edge labels or attributes; several social datasets are featureless. Evaluated by Accuracy.

Dataset details

Task

Graph classification of scientific collaboration networks (3 classes). The primary catalog metric is Accuracy.

Data

Graph classification of scientific collaboration networks (3 classes). The cataloged artifact reports 5,000 graphs, 2 target classes or tasks.

Features

The TU text format may contain discrete node or edge labels and optional continuous attributes. Social-network datasets commonly have no intrinsic node attributes, so papers often add constant or degree features; that choice changes the input.

Splits and evaluation

The catalog records these protocols or variants: 10-fold CV. Evaluation uses Accuracy (higher is better). Exact masks or folds must come from the cited release.

Quirks and pitfalls

TU datasets have no canonical train/test split. Report cross-validation folds, seeds, feature construction, and whether duplicate or isomorphic graphs were removed; published results can otherwise differ for protocol rather than model quality.

Sources

SOTA Progression

new SOTA matches SOTA at that time other proposed result other baseline result

Leaderboard

#ModelAccuracy ↑AUROCF1Testing Accuracyequivalence classesPaper
1
WL-MLP
0.9792
————
2
MSH-GNN
0.9640 ± 0.0070
————
3
CoCN
0.8722 ± 0.0013
————
4
N^2
0.8670 ± 0.0160
————
5
CoCN vanilla
0.8615 ± 0.0010
————
6
graph2vec
0.8558
————
7
GSN
0.8550 ± 0.0120
————
8
OEPG
0.8470 ± 0.0070
————
9
CORE (GraphMAE2 + CORE)
0.8430 ± 0.0010
————
10
GraphMAE2
0.8410 ± 0.0030
————
11
PXGL-GNN
0.8396 ± 0.0159
————
12
DiGGR
0.8376 ± 0.0370
————
13
GNTK
0.8360 ± 0.0100
————
14
SE2P-C3
0.8350 ± 0.0170
————
15
SE2P-C2
0.8330 ± 0.0210
————
16
Attention
0.8322 ± 0.0030
————
17
ECL-GSR
0.8300 ± 0.0143
————
18
EGG
0.8294 ± 0.0106
————
19
GraphAug
0.8290 ± 0.0020
————
20
SE2P-C4
0.8280 ± 0.0210
————
21
SAN
0.8273 ± 0.0192
————
22
GraphMAE
0.8270 ± 0.0100
————
23
Empowering GNNs
0.8250 ± 0.0120
————
24
LaplaceGNN
0.8241 ± 0.0042
————
25
SignGT
0.8240 ± 0.0014
————
26
lrGAE 6
0.8230 ± 0.0070
————
27
lrGAE 7
0.8230 ± 0.0040
————
28
lrGAE 8
0.8220 ± 0.0020
————
29
S2GAE
0.8220 ± 0.0040
————
30
JOAOv2
0.8216 ± 0.0017
————
31
DiffPool
0.8213 ± 0.0043
————
32
DiffPool-Det
0.8213
————
Graph U-Nets no code
May 2019 May '19
33
MaskGAE
0.8200 ± 0.0050
————
34
CTAug-JOAO
0.8190 ± 0.0053
————
35
SimGRACE
0.8188 ± 0.0023
————
36
Graphormer
0.8180 ± 0.0224
————
37
WGDN
0.8176 ± 0.0024
————
38
SEP-G ICE
0.8176 ± 0.0081
————
39
SAGPool
0.8176 ± 0.0157
————
40
CTAug-GraphCL
0.8172 ± 0.0026
————
41
GraphMAE2
0.8170 ± 0.0080
————
42
GCKM
0.8170 ± 0.0150
————
43
Teacher (100% training data)
0.8170
————
44
UGMAE
0.8166 ± 0.0012
————
45
Uniform PerturbEdge
0.8160 ± 0.0030
————
46
GLA
0.8154 ± 0.0014
————
47
BGRL
0.8150 ± 0.0070
————
48
GFN
0.8150 ± 0.0242
————
49
WL-PM
0.8150 ± 0.0050
————
50
Uniform MaskNF
0.8150 ± 0.0020
————
SOTA performance set a new SOTA at the time matched the SOTA at the time