TU Dortmund

MUTAG

Graph Classification PyG dataset page ↗PyG ↗

Structure

188Graphs
18Nodes
20Edges
2Classes
7Node Feature Dim
4Edge Feature Dim

Coverage

917Results
1Variants
191Papers
2-class graph classification Graph classification of mutagenic aromatic and heteroaromatic nitro compounds (2 classes). Uses the released node/edge labels or attributes; several social datasets are featureless. Evaluated by Accuracy.

Dataset details

Task

Graph classification of mutagenic aromatic and heteroaromatic nitro compounds (2 classes). The primary catalog metric is Accuracy.

Data

Graph classification of mutagenic aromatic and heteroaromatic nitro compounds (2 classes). The cataloged artifact reports 188 graphs, 2 target classes or tasks.

Features

The TU text format may contain discrete node or edge labels and optional continuous attributes. Social-network datasets commonly have no intrinsic node attributes, so papers often add constant or degree features; that choice changes the input.

Splits and evaluation

The catalog records these protocols or variants: 10-fold CV. Evaluation uses Accuracy (higher is better). Exact masks or folds must come from the cited release.

Quirks and pitfalls

TU datasets have no canonical train/test split. Report cross-validation folds, seeds, feature construction, and whether duplicate or isomorphic graphs were removed; published results can otherwise differ for protocol rather than model quality.

Sources

SOTA Progression

new SOTA matches SOTA at that time other proposed result other baseline result

Leaderboard

#ModelAccuracy ↑AUCF1InstabilityPredicted Class ProbabilitySizeSparsitySuffic.UnfaithfulnessPaper
1
MSH-GNN
0.9910 ± 0.0030
————————
2
ID-GNN+BEC
0.9830 ± 0.0360
————————
3
SupCosine
0.9830 ± 0.0250
————————
4
CauEMO
0.9692 ± 0.0136
————————
5
GALA
0.9676 ± 0.0170
————————
6
SUGAR
0.9674 ± 0.0455
————————
7
GSAT
0.9637 ± 0.0215
————————
8
novel method to learn motif-level feature embedding
0.9630 ± 0.0260
————————
9
GIN+BEC
0.9610 ± 0.0360
————————
10
GraphSNN+BEC
0.9610 ± 0.0250
————————
11
KP-GNN
0.9610 ± 0.0460
————————
12
IGM
0.9604 ± 0.0201
————————
13
NC-GNN+BEC
0.9600 ± 0.0240
————————
14
SortPool+GPL
0.9600 ± 0.0200
————————
15
CIGA
0.9577 ± 0.0123
————————
16
KP-GIN
0.9560 ± 0.0440
————————
17
OEPG
0.9530 ± 0.0060
————————
18
SAGNN
0.9520 ± 0.0300
————————
19
GCN+BEC
0.9500 ± 0.0300
————————
20
GIN+GPL
0.9500 ± 0.0447
————————
21
GraphSNN
0.9470 ± 0.0190
————————
22
RTPool
0.9470 ± 0.0330
————————
23
IB-Subgraph
0.9433 ± 0.0644
————————
24
sGIN
0.9410 ± 0.0270
————————
25
CAN
0.9410 ± 0.0480
————————
Sep 2022 Sep '22
26
GMCL-D
0.9409 ± 0.0628
————————
27
GNN performance
0.9400
————————
28
CLIP
0.9390 ± 0.0400
————————
29
GraphFM
0.9380 ± 0.0660
————————
30
LiSA
0.9370 ± 0.0140
————————
31
GIN + HOPE-WavePE
0.9360 ± 0.0580
————————
32
AgentNet
0.9360 ± 0.0860
————————
33
VEPM
0.9360 ± 0.0340
————————
34
DEL-F
0.9334 ± 0.0068
————————
35
Wit-TopoPool
0.9320 ± 0.0410
————————
36
HGCN
0.9316 ± 0.0610
————————
37
GMCL-P
0.9310 ± 0.0533
————————
38
GMCL-M
0.9310 ± 0.0630
————————
39
Message perturb
0.9310 ± 0.0533
————————
40
CI-GNN
0.9300 ± 0.0300
————————
41
StructPosGSSL-SA
0.9300 ± 0.0530
————————
42
LaplaceGNN
0.9285 ± 0.0074
————————
43
SUN (GIN) (EGO)
0.9270 ± 0.0580
————————
44
CIN
0.9270 ± 0.0610
————————
45
SAN
0.9265 ± 0.0153
————————
46
PSCN
0.9263
————————
47
PSCN k=10E
0.9263 ± 0.0421
————————
48
SoTA
0.9263 ± 0.0258
————————
49
SAT
0.9260 ± 0.0430
————————
50
PatchySan
0.9260 ± 0.0420
————————
SOTA performance set a new SOTA at the time matched the SOTA at the time