LRGB

PascalVOC-SP

Node Classification PyG dataset page ↗PyG ↗

Structure

11,355Graphs
479Nodes
2,710Edges
21Classes
14Node Feature Dim
2Edge Feature Dim

Coverage

132Results
1Variants
22Papers
21-class node classification Assign one of 21 semantic-segmentation labels, including background, to every superpixel node. Evaluated by F1.

Dataset details

Task

Assign one of 21 semantic-segmentation labels, including background, to every superpixel node. A superpixel receives the ground-truth class of the pixel at the superpixel’s center-of-mass coordinate.

Data

Each of 11,355 images from the Semantic Boundaries Dataset augmentation of Pascal VOC 2011 becomes one graph. SLIC with compactness 30 produces at most 500 image regions, and two regions are connected when they share a boundary in the default region-adjacency graph.

Features

Each node has 12 RGB summary values—the mean, standard deviation, maximum, and minimum in each channel—plus its two-dimensional center-of-mass coordinate. Each edge stores the average Sobel response and pixel count along the shared boundary.

Splits and evaluation

The original training set remains training data. The original validation set is divided equally into validation and test subsets using a stratified image-level meta-label obtained by majority vote over non-background node labels, yielding 8,498/1,428/1,429 graphs. The score is class-weighted macro F1 over nodes.

Quirks and pitfalls

This is not pixel-level segmentation; labels and predictions are quantized to superpixels, and labeling only from the center pixel can misrepresent mixed regions. LRGB also releases compactness-10 and 8-nearest-neighbor graph variants, whose structures and edge features differ from the default compactness-30 region-boundary version.

Sources

SOTA Progression

new SOTA matches SOTA at that time other proposed result other baseline result

Leaderboard

#ModelF1 ↑F1 scoreF1-macrofraction of nodes satisfying $\Delta_n(z_m)>0$Paper
1
NeuralWalker
0.4912 ± 0.0042
———
2
PPGT
0.4641 ± 0.0033
———
3
CRaWl
0.4588 ± 0.0079
———
4
GEAET
0.4585
———
5
GraphGPS
0.4538 ± 0.0083
———
6
GraphGPS + ESLapPE
0.4538 ± 0.0083
———
7
GraphGPS + RWSE
0.4531 ± 0.0073
———
8
GraphGPS + (noPE)
0.4517 ± 0.0112
———
9
GraphGPS + GCKN
0.4515 ± 0.0053
———
10
GraphGPS+LapPE
0.4501 ± 0.0057
———
11
GraphGPS + RWDIFF
0.4488 ± 0.0097
———
12
GatedGCN-VN
0.4477 ± 0.0137
———
13
Chimera
0.4460 ± 0.0070
———
14
GPS
0.4440 ± 0.0065
———
15
GraphGPS+Transformer
0.4440 ± 0.0054
———
16
Graph Mamba
0.4393 ± 0.0112
———
17
GraphGPS + SignNet
0.4291 ± 0.0056
———
18
GPS + RandAlign
0.4288 ± 0.0062
———
19
Exphormer
0.4242 ± 0.0044
———
20
Exphormer + LapPE
0.4242 ± 0.0044
———
21
GCCM
0.4219 ± 0.0102
———
22
Exphormer + RWSE
0.4218 ± 0.0063
———
23
GECO
0.4210 ± 0.0080
———
24
EXPHORMER + GCN
0.4196 ± 0.0049
———
25
GPS-PCL
0.4196 ± 0.0086
———
26
Graph-Mamba
0.4191
———
27
Exphormer + RWDIFF
0.4165 ± 0.0059
———
28
Exphormer + noPE
0.4149 ± 0.0047
———
29
Exphormer + ESLapPE
0.4141 ± 0.0054
———
30
Exphormer + WLPE
0.4104 ± 0.0071
———
31
BuNN
0.4049 ± 0.0046
———
32
FloydNet
0.4046
———
33
Exphormer
0.3975 ± 0.0037
———
34
Exphormer + SignNet
0.3966 ± 0.0020
———
35
GatedGCN + GCKN
0.3933 ± 0.0044
———
36
GatedGCN + ESLapPE
0.3930 ± 0.0041
———
37
GatedGCN + noPE
0.3923 ± 0.0020
———
38
GatedGCN+LapPE
0.3920 ± 0.0033
———
39
GatedGCN + RWDIFF
0.3919 ± 0.0019
———
40
GPS-LGD
0.3912 ± 0.0207
———
41
GatedGCN+RWSE
0.3882 ± 0.0041
———
42
GatedGCN
0.3880 ± 0.0040
———
43
Gated-GCN
0.3880 ± 0.0040
———
44
GatedGCN + SignNet
0.3814 ± 0.0005
———
45
GatedGCN + WLPE
0.3805 ± 0.0018
———
46
GPS w/ Transformer
0.3748 ± 0.0109
———
47
GPS
0.3748 ± 0.0109
———
48
GraphSAGE (PIGN)
0.3560 ± 0.0037
———
49
GRIT
0.3556 ± 0.0019
———
50
GRIT + noPE
0.3556 ± 0.0019
———
SOTA performance set a new SOTA at the time matched the SOTA at the time