LRGB

PCQM-Contact

Link Prediction PyG dataset page ↗PyG ↗

Structure

529,434Graphs
30Nodes
61Edges
1Classes
9Node Feature Dim
3Edge Feature Dim

Coverage

109Results
1Variants
17Papers
Long-range link prediction Rank atom pairs that are more than five covalent-bond hops apart but less than 3.5 angstrom apart in the molecule’s computed 3D geometry. Only atom pairs separated by more than five covalent hops are candidates. Evaluated by MRR.

Dataset details

Task

Rank atom pairs that are more than five covalent-bond hops apart but less than 3.5 angstrom apart in the molecule’s computed 3D geometry. The benchmark frames this contact-map problem as link prediction on previously unseen molecules.

Data

The 529,434 molecules come from PCQM4Mv2 training molecules with available 3D structures and at least one qualifying contact. Unlike most molecular graph benchmarks, hydrogen atoms are explicit nodes because hydrogen bonding is relevant to the contact target.

Features

Inputs are 2D covalent graphs using the OGB nine-field atom encoder and three-field bond encoder. The 3D coordinates determine labels but are not input features, and the predicted contact itself has no edge type.

Splits and evaluation

Molecules are randomly divided 90%/5%/5% into 476,490 training, 26,472 validation, and 26,472 test graphs. Evaluation uses filtered MRR and Hits@1/3: when ranking a true contact, other known true contacts for the query atom are masked rather than counted as negatives.

Quirks and pitfalls

Training supplies positive contacts without authoritative hard-negative labels; an unobserved pair is not necessarily a chemically meaningful negative. The random molecule split does not enforce scaffold separation. Results depend on filtered ranking and explicit hydrogens, and therefore are not comparable to generic binary link prediction or PCQM4Mv2 HOMO-LUMO regression.

Sources

SOTA Progression

new SOTA matches SOTA at that time other proposed result other baseline result

Leaderboard

#ModelMRR ↑F1 (unlabeled)Paper
1
FloydNet
0.6143
—
2
Exphormer + LapPE
0.4737 ± 0.0024
—
3
Exphormer
0.4737 ± 0.0024
—
4
NeuralWalker
0.4707 ± 0.0007
—
5
GPS
0.4703 ± 0.0014
—
6
GraphGPS + RWSE
0.4685 ± 0.0009
—
7
Exphormer + ESLapPE
0.4676 ± 0.0018
—
8
GatedGCN
0.4670 ± 0.0004
—
9
GraphGPS + RWDIFF
0.4669 ± 0.0006
—
10
Exphormer + noPE
0.4661 ± 0.0021
—
11
Exphormer + RWSE
0.4642 ± 0.0039
—
12
Exphormer + RWDIFF
0.4642 ± 0.0032
—
13
GraphGPS + SignNet
0.4624 ± 0.0020
—
14
GraphGPS+LapPE
0.4622 ± 0.0012
—
15
GINE
0.4617 ± 0.0005
—
16
GIN
0.4617 ± 0.0005
—
17
Exphormer + SignNet
0.4615 ± 0.0066
—
18
GraphGPS + GCKN
0.4609 ± 0.0007
—
19
GRIT + SignNet
0.4608 ± 0.0007
—
20
EXPHORMER + GCN
0.4604 ± 0.0038
—
21
GRIT + LapPE
0.4580 ± 0.0020
—
22
SparseGRIT + SignNet
0.4573 ± 0.0003
—
23
GRIT + RWDIFF
0.4563 ± 0.0003
—
24
SparseGRIT + RWSE
0.4553 ± 0.0014
—
25
SparseGRIT + RWDIFF
0.4551 ± 0.0005
—
26
SparseGRIT + ESLapPE
0.4532 ± 0.0005
—
27
SparseGRIT + noPE
0.4527 ± 0.0006
—
28
GCN
0.4526 ± 0.0006
—
29
GRIT + noPE
0.4525 ± 0.0001
—
30
GRIT + RWSE
0.4524 ± 0.0001
—
31
GRIT + GCKN
0.4521 ± 0.0002
—
32
GRIT + WLPE
0.4515 ± 0.0004
—
33
SparseGRIT + GCKN
0.4500 ± 0.0004
—
34
SparseGRIT + WLPE
0.4489 ± 0.0012
—
35
GRIT + ESLapPE
0.4486 ± 0.0014
—
36
CoCN exp.
0.3713 ± 0.0037
—
37
Exphormer
0.3637 ± 0.0020
—
38
Exphormer
0.3587
—
39
GPS
0.3543 ± 0.0004
—
40
GECO
0.3526 ± 0.0016
—
41
GatedGCN + ReHub-FC
0.3526 ± 0.0014
—
42
GatedGCN+RWSE + ReHub-FC
0.3523 ± 0.0012
—
43
GENs
0.3520 ± 0.0010
—
44
GEAET
0.3518 ± 0.0011
—
45
IPR-MPNN
0.3516 ± 0.0102
—
46
GPS
0.3498 ± 0.0005
—
47
GatedGCN
0.3495 ± 0.0010
—
48
ReHub-FC
0.3492 ± 0.0012
—
49
Cache-GNN+RWSE
0.3488 ± 0.0008
—
50
ReHub
0.3469 ± 0.0014
—
SOTA performance set a new SOTA at the time matched the SOTA at the time