LRGB
Peptides-func
Structure
15,535Graphs
151Nodes
307Edges
10Classes
9Node Feature Dim
3Edge Feature Dim
Coverage
246Results
1Variants
42Papers
- ICML 2026: RADE: Random Add-Drop Edge as a Regularizer RADE: Random Add-Drop Edge as a Regularizer ICML 2026
- From Message-Passing to Linearized Graph Sequence Models From Message-Passing to Linearized Graph Sequence Models
- Latent-Hysteresis Graph ODEs: Modeling Coupled Topology-Feature Evolution via Continuous Phase Transitions Latent-Hysteresis Graph ODEs: Modeling Coupled Topology-Feature Evolution via Continuous Phase Transitions
- FloydNet: A Learning Paradigm for Global Relational Reasoning FloydNet: A Learning Paradigm for Global Relational Reasoning
- GraIP: A Benchmarking Framework For Neural Graph Inverse Problems GraIP: A Benchmarking Framework For Neural Graph Inverse Problems
- Position: Don't be Afraid of Over-Smoothing And Over-Squashing Position: Don't be Afraid of Over-Smoothing And Over-Squashing
- TMLR 2025: Chimera: State Space Models Beyond Sequences Chimera: State Space Models Beyond Sequences TMLR 2025
- gLSTM: Mitigating Over-Squashing by Increasing Storage Capacity gLSTM: Mitigating Over-Squashing by Increasing Storage Capacity
- On The Expressive Power of GNN Derivatives On The Expressive Power of GNN Derivatives
- NeurIPS 2025: Long-Range Graph Wavelet Networks Long-Range Graph Wavelet Networks NeurIPS 2025
- TANGO: Graph Neural Dynamics via Learned Energy and Tangential Flows TANGO: Graph Neural Dynamics via Learned Energy and Tangential Flows
- KDD 2025: Towards Efficient Few-shot Graph Neural Architecture Search via Partitioning Gradient Contribution Towards Efficient Few-shot Graph Neural Architecture Search via Partitioning Gradient Contribution KDD 2025
- Plain Transformers Can be Powerful Graph Learners Plain Transformers Can be Powerful Graph Learners
- On Vanishing Gradients, Over-Smoothing, and Over-Squashing in GNNs: Bridging Recurrent and Graph Learning On Vanishing Gradients, Over-Smoothing, and Over-Squashing in GNNs: Bridging Recurrent and Graph Learning
- Molecular fingerprints are strong models for peptide function prediction Molecular fingerprints are strong models for peptide function prediction
- AAAI 2024: Pre-training Graph Neural Networks on Molecules by Using Subgraph-Conditioned Graph Information Bottleneck Pre-training Graph Neural Networks on Molecules by Using Subgraph-Conditioned Graph Information Bottleneck AAAI 2024
- KDD 2024: Benchmarking Positional Encodings for GNNs and Graph Transformers Benchmarking Positional Encodings for GNNs and Graph Transformers KDD 2024
- NeurIPS 2024: Unitary convolutions for learning on graphs and groups Unitary convolutions for learning on graphs and groups NeurIPS 2024
- Graph Triple Attention Network: A Decoupled Perspective Graph Triple Attention Network: A Decoupled Perspective
- Molecular Topological Profile (MOLTOP) - Simple and Strong Baseline for Molecular Graph Classification Molecular Topological Profile (MOLTOP) - Simple and Strong Baseline for Molecular Graph Classification
- TMLR 2024: Graph Pooling via Ricci Flow Graph Pooling via Ricci Flow TMLR 2024
- ICLR 2024: Revisiting Random Walks for Learning on Graphs Revisiting Random Walks for Learning on Graphs ICLR 2024
- ICLR 2024: Graph Neural Networks Gone Hogwild Graph Neural Networks Gone Hogwild ICLR 2024
- AAAI 2024: A Scalable and Effective Alternative to Graph Transformers A Scalable and Effective Alternative to Graph Transformers AAAI 2024
- NeurIPS 2024: A Flexible, Equivariant Framework for Subgraph GNNs via Graph Products and Graph Coarsening A Flexible, Equivariant Framework for Subgraph GNNs via Graph Products and Graph Coarsening NeurIPS 2024
- NeurIPS 2024: Spatio-Spectral Graph Neural Networks Spatio-Spectral Graph Neural Networks NeurIPS 2024
- Bundle Neural Networks for message diffusion on graphs Bundle Neural Networks for message diffusion on graphs
- ICLR 2024: Distinguished In Uniform: Self Attention Vs. Virtual Nodes Distinguished In Uniform: Self Attention Vs. Virtual Nodes ICLR 2024
- RandAlign: A Parameter-Free Method for Regularizing Graph Convolutional Networks RandAlign: A Parameter-Free Method for Regularizing Graph Convolutional Networks
- NeurIPS 2024: Weisfeiler and Leman Go Loopy: A New Hierarchy for Graph Representational Learning Weisfeiler and Leman Go Loopy: A New Hierarchy for Graph Representational Learning NeurIPS 2024
- KDD 2024: Graph Mamba: Towards Learning on Graphs with State Space Models Graph Mamba: Towards Learning on Graphs with State Space Models KDD 2024
- Topology-Informed Graph Transformer Topology-Informed Graph Transformer
- ICML 2023: Recurrent Distance Filtering for Graph Representation Learning Recurrent Distance Filtering for Graph Representation Learning ICML 2023
- TMLR 2023: Non-backtracking Graph Neural Networks Non-backtracking Graph Neural Networks TMLR 2023
- ICLR 2023: Locality-Aware Graph Rewiring in GNNs Locality-Aware Graph Rewiring in GNNs ICLR 2023
- Mitigating Over-Smoothing and Over-Squashing using Augmentations of Forman-Ricci Curvature Mitigating Over-Smoothing and Over-Squashing using Augmentations of Forman-Ricci Curvature
- TMLR 2023: Where Did the Gap Go? Reassessing the Long-Range Graph Benchmark Where Did the Gap Go? Reassessing the Long-Range Graph Benchmark TMLR 2023
- CIN++: Enhancing Topological Message Passing CIN++: Enhancing Topological Message Passing
- Multiresolution Graph Transformers and Wavelet Positional Encoding for Learning Hierarchical Structures Multiresolution Graph Transformers and Wavelet Positional Encoding for Learning Hierarchical Structures
- ICML 2023: On the Connection Between MPNN and Graph Transformer On the Connection Between MPNN and Graph Transformer ICML 2023
- ICML 2022: A Generalization of ViT/MLP-Mixer to Graphs A Generalization of ViT/MLP-Mixer to Graphs ICML 2022
- NeurIPS 2022: LRGB LRGB NeurIPS 2022
10-dimensional multi-label classification on molecular graphs without hydrogens. Predict a binary label per peptide function (antibacterial, antiviral, cell-cell communication, antifungal, anticancer, etc.) from OGB features. Positive rates span 1.9%–62.7%; evaluated by AP.
Dataset details
Task
Predict all applicable therapeutic-function labels for each peptide. A peptide may have several of the 10 labels, so this is graph-level multi-label classification evaluated with the unweighted mean average precision across labels.
Data
The benchmark contains 15,535 peptides selected from SATPdb, which itself aggregates and manually curates peptide records from 22 source databases. Each peptide is represented as a molecular graph whose nodes are non-hydrogen atoms and whose edges are covalent bonds.
Features
The graphs reuse OGB molecular featurization computed from SMILES: each atom has nine categorical feature fields and each bond has three. The benchmark deliberately omits peptide 2D folding and 3D conformation; its graph describes covalent connectivity rather than the peptide’s folded spatial structure.
Splits and evaluation
The fixed split is 70% training, 15% validation, and 15% test. It is stratified by the complete 10-label combination, with combinations occurring fewer than 10 times pooled into one meta-class. The labels are strongly imbalanced, which is why average precision rather than accuracy is the primary metric.
Quirks and pitfalls
The 10 labels are correlated and non-exclusive; treating the task as single-label classification is incorrect. SATPdb combines records from many upstream databases, and many peptides have multiple functions. Randomly resplitting the data or adding predicted structural information changes the published LRGB protocol. The benchmark’s long atom-level chains should not be mistaken for experimentally determined peptide conformations.
Sources
SOTA Progression
new SOTA
matches SOTA at that time
other proposed result
other baseline result
Leaderboard
| # | Model | AP ↑ | AUPRC | Accuracy | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S^2GCN | 0.7311
±
0.0066 | — | — | |
| 2 | S4G | 0.7293
±
0.0004 | — | — | |
| 3 | BuNN | 0.7276
±
0.0065 | — | — | |
| 4 | GCN | 0.7261
±
0.0011 | — | — | |
| 5 | MPNNs | 0.7250
±
0.0023 | — | — | |
| 6 | DRAGON | 0.7240
±
0.0450 | — | — | |
| 7 | LR-GWN | 0.7216
±
0.0041 | — | — | |
| 8 | kGCN-SSM | 0.7212
±
0.0027 | — | — | |
| 9 | NBA-GCN+LapPE | 0.7207
±
0.0028 | — | — | |
| 10 | Lie UniGCN | 0.7173
±
0.0061 | — | — | |
| 11 | GCN | 0.7160
±
0.0050 | — | — | |
| 12 | DRew+LapPE | 0.7150
±
0.0044 | — | — | |
| 13 | DRew-GCN | 0.7150
±
0.0044 | — | — | |
| 14 | DRew | 0.7150
±
0.0044 | — | — | |
| 15 | DRew-GCN+LapPE | 0.7150
±
0.0044 | — | — | |
| 16 | HGODE | 0.7140
±
0.0220 | — | — | |
| 17 | GRED+LapPE | 0.7133
±
0.0011 | — | — | |
| 18 | DRew-GIN+LapPE | 0.7126
±
0.0045 | — | — | |
| 19 | RWNN-DeBERTa | 0.7123
±
0.0016 | — | — | |
| 20 | GREAD-Exp | 0.7110
±
0.0400 | — | — | |
| 21 | NeuralWalker | 0.7096
±
0.0078 | — | — | |
| 22 | GRED | 0.7085
±
0.0027 | — | — | |
| 23 | CRaWl | 0.7074 | — | — | |
| 24 | UniGCN | 0.7072
±
0.0035 | — | — | |
| 25 | Graph Mamba | 0.7071
±
0.0083 | — | — | |
| 26 | GMN | 0.7071
±
0.0083 | — | — | |
| 27 | GIN | 0.7059
±
0.0089 | — | — | |
| 28 | GRAMA_GatedGCN | 0.7049
±
0.0051 | — | — | |
| 29 | GREAD-BS | 0.7040
±
0.0460 | — | — | |
| 30 | Orthogonal GCN | 0.7037
±
0.0053 | — | — | |
| 31 | DeGTA | 0.7023
±
0.0101 | — | — | |
| 32 | Chimera | 0.7021
±
0.0030 | — | — | |
| 33 | TANGO-GPS | 0.7021
±
0.0043 | — | — | |
| 34 | PH-DGN | 0.7012
±
0.0045 | — | — | |
| 35 | GatedGCN | 0.7006
±
0.0033 | — | — | |
| 36 | DRew | 0.6996
±
0.0076 | — | — | |
| 37 | DRew-GCN | 0.6996
±
0.0076 | — | — | |
| 38 | GCNII | 0.6990
±
0.0030 | — | — | |
| 39 | GRIT | 0.6988
±
0.0082 | — | — | |
| 40 | FROND | 0.6980
±
0.0340 | — | — | |
| 41 | DRew-GatedGCN+LapPE | 0.6977
±
0.0026 | — | — | |
| 42 | GECO | 0.6975
±
0.0025 | — | — | |
| 43 | WaveGC | 0.6973
±
0.0043 | — | — | |
| 44 | Graph MLP-Mixer | 0.6970
±
0.0080 | — | — | |
| 45 | HOD-GNN | 0.6968
±
0.0056 | — | — | |
| 46 | PPGT | 0.6961
±
0.0062 | — | — | |
| 47 | GAPH ViT | 0.6942
±
0.0075 | — | — | |
| 48 | Graph ViT | 0.6942
±
0.0075 | — | — | |
| 49 | S-CGIB | 0.6940
±
0.0020 | — | — | |
| 50 | DRew-GIN | 0.6940
±
0.0074 | — | — |
SOTA performance
set a new SOTA at the time
matched the SOTA at the time