Heterophilic Graphs

Squirrel

Node Classification PyG dataset page ↗PyG ↗

Structure

1Graphs
5,201Nodes
217,073Edges
5Classes
2089Node Feature Dim
0.22Homophily

Coverage

398Results
1Variants
51Papers
5-class node classification Wikipedia Squirrel page node classification (5 classes, heterophilic). Uses the Geom-GCN/PyG node features and graph. Evaluated by Accuracy.

Dataset details

Task

Wikipedia Squirrel page node classification (5 classes, heterophilic). The primary catalog metric is Accuracy.

Data

Wikipedia Squirrel page node classification (5 classes, heterophilic). The cataloged artifact reports 1 graphs, 5 target classes or tasks.

Features

Features and edges follow the Geom-GCN/PyG artifact: WebKB uses webpage bag-of-words and hyperlinks, Actor uses film-page keywords and co-occurrence links, and WikipediaNetwork uses page features and hyperlinks.

Splits and evaluation

The catalog records these protocols or variants: Standard split, Filtered split. Evaluation uses Accuracy (higher is better). Exact masks or folds must come from the cited release.

Quirks and pitfalls

These small or repurposed graphs have contested preprocessing and split conventions. Results across Geom-GCN, PyG, and corrected heterophily artifacts are not automatically comparable; class imbalance and high variance require multiple splits.

Sources

Geom-GCN 10 fixed splits.

SOTA Progression

new SOTA matches SOTA at that time other proposed result other baseline result

Leaderboard

#ModelAccuracy ↑Accuracy (micro F1 per L1108)F1Paper
1
IBG-NN
0.7763 ± 0.0179
——
2
Dir-GNN+CNA
0.7747 ± 0.0128
——
3
DHGNN
0.7684 ± 0.0161
——
4
FaberNet
0.7671 ± 0.0192
——
5
ScaleNet
0.7600 ± 0.0200
——
6
LargeScaleNet
0.7590 ± 0.0200
——
7
Dir-GNN
0.7560 ± 0.0190
——
8
NDDGNN
0.7538 ± 0.0195
——
9
DirGNN
0.7513 ± 0.0195
——
10
GPR-GNN
0.7480 ± 0.0050
——
11
FSGNN
0.7416
——
12
FC-GSSL
0.7403 ± 0.0084
——
13
CoCN
0.7298 ± 0.0178
——
14
CoCN vanilla
0.7295 ± 0.0023
——
15
ADR-GNN_S
0.7254 ± 0.0220
——
16
DGMAE
0.7247 ± 0.0177
——
17
GraphPAE
0.7205 ± 0.0140
——
18
GPNet
0.7157 ± 0.0010
——
19
GloGNN
0.7121 ± 0.0184
——
20
GraphMAE2
0.7027 ± 0.0088
——
21
UniGAP
0.6967 ± 0.0160
——
22
S2GAE
0.6860 ± 0.0056
——
23
MaskGAE
0.6853 ± 0.0044
——
24
UDGNN_GCN
0.6813 ± 0.0260
——
25
ACM-GCN
0.6740 ± 0.0221
——
26
ACMII-GCN
0.6740 ± 0.0221
——
27
RDGNN-S
0.6596 ± 0.0211
——
28
RDGNN-I
0.6562 ± 0.0233
——
29
NWR-GAE
0.6481 ± 0.0183
——
30
G2-GraphSAGE
0.6426 ± 0.0238
——
31
G2
0.6426 ± 0.0238
——
32
G^2
0.6426 ± 0.0238
——
33
HopGNN
0.6423 ± 0.0133
——
34
ICG-NN
0.6402 ± 0.0167
——
35
OptBasisGNN
0.6362 ± 0.0076
——
36
AdaptKry
0.6331 ± 0.0076
——
37
Sp^2GCL
0.6261 ± 0.0087
——
38
AUG-MAE
0.6257 ± 0.0067
——
39
H2GCN
0.6190 ± 0.0140
——
40
LINKX
0.6181 ± 0.0180
——
41
AERO-GNN
0.6176 ± 0.0240
——
42
CCA-SSG
0.6158 ± 0.0198
——
43
HopGNN+SCL
0.6142 ± 0.0198
——
44
GraphMAE
0.6113 ± 0.0060
——
45
F-GREAD-BS
0.6086 ± 0.0105
——
46
GCN
0.6067
——
47
LON-GNN
0.6061 ± 0.0169
——
48
GCN + HalfHop
0.6024 ± 0.0240
——
49
H2GCN + HalfHop
0.6024 ± 0.0240
——
50
MVGRL
0.6009 ± 0.0044
——
SOTA performance set a new SOTA at the time matched the SOTA at the time