Heterophilic Graphs

Texas

Node Classification PyG dataset page ↗PyG ↗

Structure

1Graphs
183Nodes
309Edges
5Classes
1703Node Feature Dim
0.11Homophily

Coverage

827Results
1Variants
136Papers
5-class node classification Classify each webpage as student, project, course, staff, or faculty using the page text and hyperlink graph. Uses the Geom-GCN/PyG node features and graph. Evaluated by Accuracy.

Dataset details

Task

Classify each webpage as student, project, course, staff, or faculty using the page text and hyperlink graph. This is transductive node classification on one university-specific subgraph of WebKB.

Data

Nodes are webpages collected from the University of Texas computer-science department and edges are hyperlinks between pages. The Geom-GCN/PyG processing used in graph-learning papers contains 183 nodes; it is only one processed subset of the broader seven-class, multi-university WebKB collection.

Features

Each node has a 1,703-dimensional bag-of-words representation of its webpage content. The graph structure records hyperlinks rather than text similarity.

Splits and evaluation

The standard graph-learning protocol uses the 10 fixed Geom-GCN train/validation/test splits and reports mean accuracy across them. Results from newly generated splits or from the larger WebKB/WebKB4 collections are not directly comparable.

Quirks and pitfalls

Texas is extremely small and severely class-imbalanced: one of its five classes contains only one node. Accuracy can therefore conceal poor minority-class behavior, and results have high variance across splits. The names WebKB, WebKB4, 4 Universities, and Texas refer to related but different selections and label sets, so the exact processed artifact must be stated.

Sources

Geom-GCN 10 fixed splits; results typically averaged.

SOTA Progression

new SOTA matches SOTA at that time other proposed result other baseline result

Leaderboard

#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
P^2GNN
0.9672 ± 0.0147
2
DoG
0.9660 ± 0.0210
3
GPF-plus
0.9583 ± 0.0419
4
GCL + GPF_plus
0.9583 ± 0.0419
5
ACM-GCN
0.9510 ± 0.0320
6
Mixhop/ +Hetero-S
0.9486
7
VR-GNN
0.9486 ± 0.0189
8
GrokFormer
0.9459 ± 0.0208
9
RDGNN-S
0.9459 ± 0.0597
10
SCNode
0.9459 ± 0.0525
11
SPCNet-L
0.9426 ± 0.0131
Mar 2024 Mar '24
12
general Bayesian inference strategy + GCNII
0.9410 ± 0.0353
13
GraphMAE + GPF_plus
0.9409 ± 0.0440
14
NFGNN
0.9403 ± 0.0082
15
SPCNet-D
0.9393 ± 0.0128
Mar 2024 Mar '24
16
QW
0.9393 ± 0.0098
17
EvenNet
0.9377 ± 0.0173
Mar 2024 Mar '24
18
ADR-GNN_S
0.9361 ± 0.0426
19
RDGNN-I
0.9351 ± 0.0593
20
OptBasisGNN
0.9348 ± 0.0168
Mar 2024 Mar '24
21
JacobiConv
0.9344 ± 0.0213
Mar 2024 Mar '24
22
ChebNetII
0.9328 ± 0.0147
23
PDE-GCNM
0.9324
24
PDE-GCN
0.9324 ± 0.0203
25
BMGCN
0.9300 ± 0.0057
26
F-GREAD-BS
0.9297 ± 0.0439
27
GWN-fa
0.9294 ± 0.0445
28
GPRGNN
0.9292 ± 0.0061
29
GPR-GNN
0.9291 ± 0.0132
30
BernNet
0.9262 ± 0.0137
31
DMD++
0.9260 ± 0.0340
32
SGFormer
0.9246 ± 0.0148
33
2-HiGCN
0.9245 ± 0.0073
34
H2GCN/ +Hetero-S
0.9228
35
MLP-2
0.9226 ± 0.0071
36
HiGCN
0.9215 ± 0.0073
37
EdgePreGPPT + GPF_plus
0.9214 ± 0.0546
38
GGCN
0.9213 ± 0.0305
39
CGP (APPNP)
0.9189
40
GNSN
0.9189 ± 0.0295
41
NAGphormer
0.9180 ± 0.0185
42
HA-GAT
0.9175 ± 0.0352
Feb 2023 Feb '23
43
AMLP
0.9133 ± 0.0374
44
TWIRLS
0.9131 ± 0.0336
45
APPNP
0.9118 ± 0.0070
46
Ordered GNN
0.9082 ± 0.0418
47
SimGRACE + GPF_plus
0.9074 ± 0.0312
48
D-GREAD
0.9054 ± 0.0325
49
LGTL
0.9032 ± 0.0068
50
LRGNN
0.9027 ± 0.0449
SOTA performance set a new SOTA at the time matched the SOTA at the time