Classic

WikiCS

Node Classification PyG dataset page ↗PyG ↗

Structure

1Graphs
11,701Nodes
216,123Edges
10Classes
300Node Feature Dim
0.74Homophily

Coverage

433Results
1Variants
55Papers
10-class node classification on a Wikipedia hyperlink graph, predicting each article’s computer-science category from text-derived features. Evaluated by Accuracy.

Dataset details

Task

Wikipedia-based node classification (10 classes) with 20 train splits. The primary catalog metric is Accuracy.

Data

Wikipedia-based node classification (10 classes) with 20 train splits. The cataloged artifact reports 1 graphs, 10 target classes or tasks.

Features

The representation follows the cited PyG loader or benchmark release. Node and edge fields are dataset-specific; preprocessing, graph direction, and any feature normalization must be kept fixed when reproducing a result.

Splits and evaluation

The catalog records these protocols or variants: Standard split. Evaluation uses Accuracy (higher is better). Exact masks or folds must come from the cited release.

Quirks and pitfalls

The same short dataset name is used for incompatible processed artifacts and split protocols. Report the loader/version, directedness, feature preprocessing, and exact masks; transductive results should not be described as inductive.

Sources

SOTA Progression

new SOTA matches SOTA at that time other proposed result other baseline result

Leaderboard

#ModelAccuracy ↑F1FidelityMacro-F1Micro-F1Paper
1
GCN
0.9302 ± 0.0011
————
2
RSE + RGCN (70b)
0.8852 ± 0.0019
————
3
LEMP+T
0.8825
————
4
RevGAT+T
0.8824
————
5
SAGE+T
0.8823
————
6
RSE + SeHGNN (70b)
0.8796 ± 0.0020
————
7
GraphSSR
0.8793
————
8
Jacobi
0.8778
————
9
SAGE
0.8771
————
10
RSE + UniMP (70b)
0.8769 ± 0.0018
————
11
GPR
0.8755
————
12
APPNP
0.8754
————
13
RSE + HAN (70b)
0.8749 ± 0.0015
————
14
LEMP
0.8729
————
15
GBK
0.8723
————
16
GCN
0.8700
————
17
Graph-R1
0.8689
————
18
OGNN
0.8684
————
19
GCNII
0.8674
————
20
RevGAT
0.8665
————
21
H2GCN
0.8660
————
22
FAGCN
0.8655
————
23
Disam
0.8651
————
24
JKNet
0.8629
————
25
MPNN
0.8621 ± 0.0039
————
26
SATA
0.8602
————
27
MLP+LLM_features
0.8597
————
28
Cheby
0.8597
————
29
BORF
0.8589 ± 0.0028
————
30
GrokFormer
0.8557 ± 0.0065
————
31
CO-EVOLVE
0.8535
————
32
GAT
0.8533
————
33
Specformer
0.8515 ± 0.0063
————
34
HopGNN
0.8473 ± 0.0059
————
35
PromptGFM
0.8466
————
36
SPEXPHORMER
0.8453 ± 0.0015
————
37
TAPE
0.8444
————
38
VCR-Graphormer
0.8432 ± 0.0001
————
39
UniMP
0.8429 ± 0.0023
————
40
JacobiConv
0.8413 ± 0.0049
————
41
Graph-Mamba
0.8407 ± 0.0076
————
42
STAG + Linear Probing
0.8405 ± 0.0578
————
43
UniFilter
0.8400 ± 0.0026
————
44
CoBFormer
0.8395 ± 0.0028
————
45
MPNN+VN
0.8367 ± 0.0066
————
46
PolyFormer
0.8362 ± 0.0017
————
47
BernNet
0.8356 ± 0.0061
————
48
STAG + Prompt Tuning
0.8355 ± 0.0594
————
49
H2GCN
0.8345 ± 0.0026
————
50
NAGphormer
0.8341 ± 0.0034
————
SOTA performance set a new SOTA at the time matched the SOTA at the time