Heterophilic Graphs

Wisconsin

Node Classification PyG dataset page ↗PyG ↗

Structure

1Graphs
251Nodes
499Edges
5Classes
1703Node Feature Dim
0.21Homophily

Coverage

284Results
1Variants
38Papers
5-class node classification WebKB node classification on Wisconsin university webpages (5 classes). Uses the Geom-GCN/PyG node features and graph. Evaluated by Accuracy.

Dataset details

Task

WebKB node classification on Wisconsin university webpages (5 classes). The primary catalog metric is Accuracy.

Data

WebKB node classification on Wisconsin university webpages (5 classes).

Features

Features and edges follow the Geom-GCN/PyG artifact: WebKB uses webpage bag-of-words and hyperlinks, Actor uses film-page keywords and co-occurrence links, and WikipediaNetwork uses page features and hyperlinks.

Splits and evaluation

The catalog records these protocols or variants: Standard split. Evaluation uses Accuracy (higher is better). Exact masks or folds must come from the cited release.

Quirks and pitfalls

These small or repurposed graphs have contested preprocessing and split conventions. Results across Geom-GCN, PyG, and corrected heterophily artifacts are not automatically comparable; class imbalance and high variance require multiple splits.

Sources

Geom-GCN 10 fixed splits.

SOTA Progression

new SOTA matches SOTA at that time other proposed result other baseline result

Leaderboard

#ModelAccuracy ↑F1Micro-F1Paper
1
DMD++
0.9190 ± 0.0260
——
2
F-GREAD-BS
0.9059 ± 0.0380
——
3
APPNP
0.9010 ± 0.0350
——
4
GNSN
0.9002 ± 0.0194
——
5
GLGCNII
0.8972
——
6
GREAD-BS
0.8941 ± 0.0330
——
7
Sheaf
0.8941 ± 0.0474
——
8
GREAD
0.8941 ± 0.0130
——
9
DMD-ACMP
0.8940 ± 0.0220
——
10
M2M-GNN
0.8901 ± 0.0410
——
11
Framelets
0.8890 ± 0.0320
——
12
GRAND
0.8860 ± 0.0210
——
13
MM-FGCN
0.8850 ± 0.0410
——
14
ACM-GCN
0.8843 ± 0.0322
——
15
MUSE
0.8824 ± 0.0320
——
16
LRGNN
0.8823 ± 0.0354
——
17
GNRF
0.8820 ± 0.0384
——
18
GIND
0.8804 ± 0.0397
——
19
Ord. GNN
0.8804 ± 0.0360
——
20
OGNN
0.8804 ± 0.0363
——
21
GCON
0.8780 ± 0.0330
——
22
GRAFF
0.8745 ± 0.0294
——
23
NLMLP
0.8730 ± 0.0430
——
May 2020 May '20
24
DiGGR
0.8725 ± 0.0441
——
25
GloGNN
0.8706 ± 0.0353
——
26
EM-ACM
0.8706 ± 0.0251
——
27
WRGAT
0.8698 ± 0.0378
——
28
GOAL
0.8698 ± 0.0440
——
29
de_attn + ada_inte
0.8695
——
30
EIGNN
0.8686 ± 0.0554
——
31
GGCN
0.8686 ± 0.0329
——
32
H_2GCN
0.8670 ± 0.0470
——
May 2020 May '20
33
H2GCN-1
0.8667 ± 0.0469
——
34
MLP + GCN
0.8643 ± 0.0400
——
35
ACMP
0.8610 ± 0.0400
——
36
H2GCN
0.8588 ± 0.0458
——
37
H2GCN-2
0.8588 ± 0.0422
——
38
HopGNN
0.8569 ± 0.0543
——
39
SimP-GCN
0.8550
——
May 2020 May '20
40
PloyGCL
0.8550 ± 0.0188
——
41
GPRGNN
0.8550 ± 0.0500
——
42
MLP LO
0.8528 ± 0.0588
——
43
DMD-GCN
0.8520 ± 0.0210
——
44
GREET
0.8490
——
45
MLP
0.8490 ± 0.0530
——
May 2020 May '20
46
R-SoftGraphAIN
0.8471 ± 0.0088
——
47
CPGNN-MLP
0.8458 ± 0.0272
——
48
ARMA
0.8450 ± 0.0030
——
49
GraphSAGE+mix.
0.8450 ± 0.0110
——
50
de_attn + c_inte
0.8449
——
SOTA performance set a new SOTA at the time matched the SOTA at the time