NeurIPS 2018

Adaptive Sampling Towards Fast Graph Representation Learning

Wen-bing Huang, Tong Zhang, Yu Rong, Junzhou Huang

Main figure for Adaptive Sampling Towards Fast Graph Representation Learning

Abstract

Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) have become a crucial tool on learning representations of graph vertices. The main challenge of adapting GCNs on large-scale graphs is the scalability issue that it incurs heavy cost both in computation and memory due to the uncontrollable neighborhood expansion across layers. In this paper, we accelerate the training of GCNs through developing an adaptive layer-wise sampling method. By constructing the network layer by layer in a top-down passway, we sample the lower layer conditioned on the top one, where the sampled neighborhoods are shared by different parent nodes and the over expansion is avoided owing to the fixed-size sampling. More importantly, the proposed sampler is adaptive and applicable for explicit variance reduction, which in turn enhances the training of our method. Furthermore, we propose a novel and economical approach to promote the message passing over distant nodes by applying skip connections. Intensive experiments on several benchmarks verify the effectiveness of our method regarding the classification accuracy while enjoying faster convergence speed.

Benchmark Results

Tested on 1 dataset Non-standard metric on 1 dataset

Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).

Classic

Reddit

Global leaderboard →
Non-default metric. This paper reports Accuracy; the dataset default is F1. Values below use Accuracy only.

Sorted by Accuracy. Highlighted rows are from other papers.

#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
GAP-EDP
0.9870 ±0.0003
2
NE-ASGCN
0.9758 ±0.0027
3
HSGT
0.9730 ±0.0024
21
GraphSAGE
0.9653 ±0.0011
34
Adapt
0.9627 ±0.0032
This paper
48
Full
0.9568 ±0.0069
This paper
75
Node-Wise
0.9449 ±0.0026
This paper
86
FastGCN
actual #86 vs paper #102 16 places worse
0.9370
best reported
actual #86 vs paper #102 16 places worse
paper 0.9200 ±0.0050
paper 0.9200 ±0.0050 Δ today 0.0170
143
IID
0.8611 ±0.0437
This paper
147
MLP
0.8240 ±0.0010
SOTA performance (not significantly different from the best) Baseline / comparison (this paper) Global context (other papers) Best today — OK at publication; today's leaderboard best is elsewhere