Graph-Revised Convolutional Network
Abstract
Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) have received increasing attention in the machine learning community for effectively leveraging both the content features of nodes and the linkage patterns across graphs in various applications. As real-world graphs are often incomplete and noisy, treating them as ground-truth information, which is a common practice in most GCNs, unavoidably leads to sub-optimal solutions. Existing efforts for addressing this problem either involve an over-parameterized model which is difficult to scale, or simply re-weight observed edges without dealing with the missing-edge issue. This paper proposes a novel framework called Graph-Revised Convolutional Network (GRCN), which avoids both extremes. Specifically, a GCN-based graph revision module is introduced for predicting missing edges and revising edge weights w.r.t. downstream tasks via joint optimization. A theoretical analysis reveals the connection between GRCN and previous work on multigraph belief propagation. Experiments on six benchmark datasets show that GRCN consistently outperforms strong baseline methods, especially when the original graphs are severely incomplete or the labeled instances for model training are highly sparse.
Benchmark Results
Tested on 1 dataset
Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).
Classic
| # | Model | Accuracy ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GraphTARIF | 0.9461
±0.0017 | |
| 2 | GCN | 0.8190
±0.0170 | prev best: Measuring and Relieving the Over-smoothing Problem for Graph Neural Networks from the Topological View (AAAI 2019) best today: Graph Transductive Sharpening: Leveraging Unlabeled Predictions in Node Classification (2026) Improvement within reported uncertainty; not highlighted. |
| 3 | GAT | 0.8180
±0.0200 | prev best: Measuring and Relieving the Over-smoothing Problem for Graph Neural Networks from the Topological View (AAAI 2019) best today: Graph Transductive Sharpening: Leveraging Unlabeled Predictions in Node Classification (2026) Improvement within reported uncertainty; not highlighted. |
| 8 | SAGE | 0.9351
±0.0006 | |
| 82 | SGC | 0.9022
±0.0021 best reported | |
| 320 | MLP | 0.8463 | |
| 359 | GRCN | 0.8370
±0.0180 | This paper |
| 368 | Fast-GRCN | 0.8350
±0.0160 | This paper |
| 428 | GLCN | 0.8040
±0.0190 | This paper |
