OGB
Abstract
We present the Open Graph Benchmark (OGB), a diverse set of challenging and realistic benchmark datasets to facilitate scalable, robust, and reproducible graph machine learning (ML) research. OGB datasets are large-scale (up to 100+ million nodes and 1+ billion edges), encompass multiple important graph ML tasks, and cover a diverse range of domains, ranging from social and information networks to biological networks, molecular graphs, source code ASTs, and knowledge graphs. For each dataset, we provide a unified evaluation protocol using meaningful application-specific data splits and evaluation metrics. In addition to building the datasets, we also perform extensive benchmark experiments for each dataset. Our experiments suggest that OGB datasets present significant challenges of scalability to large-scale graphs and out-of-distribution generalization under realistic data splits, indicating fruitful opportunities for future research. Finally, OGB provides an automated end-to-end graph ML pipeline that simplifies and standardizes the process of graph data loading, experimental setup, and model evaluation. OGB will be regularly updated and welcomes inputs from the community. OGB datasets as well as data loaders, evaluation scripts, baseline code, and leaderboards are publicly available at this https URL.
Benchmark Results
Tested on 6 datasets
Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).
OGB
| # | Model | Hits@50 ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PROXI | 0.7650
±0.0027 | |
| 2 | OGB Leader | 0.7129
±0.0018 | |
| 3 | GIDN | 0.7096
±0.0055 | |
| 9 | GCN | 0.6621
±0.0033 best reported | best today: On the Impact of Feature Heterophily on Link Prediction with Graph Neural Networks (NeurIPS 2024) |
| 28 | SAGE | 0.5944
±0.0137 | |
| 41 | GraphSAGE | 0.5463
±0.0112 | This paper |
| 68 | Node2Vec | 0.4929
±0.0064 best reported | best today: Asymmetric Learning for Graph Neural Network based Link Prediction (2023) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 94 | MLP | 0.4438
±0.0347 best reported | best today: Weak Models Can be Good Teachers: A Case Study on Link Prediction with MLPs (2025) |
| 102 | MatrixFactorization | 0.3886
±0.0029 | This paper |
| # | Model | Hits@20 ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ELGNN | 0.9777
±0.0037 | |
| 2 | GIDN | 0.9542 | |
| 3 | AGDN | 0.9538
±0.0094 | |
| 20 | SAGE | 0.6719
±0.0118 | |
| 24 | GCN | 0.6476
±0.0145 best reported | best today: Link Prediction with Untrained Message Passing Layers (2024) |
| 25 | Node2Vec | 0.6363
±0.0205 best reported | best today: Link Prediction with Untrained Message Passing Layers (2024) |
| 38 | GraphSAGE | 0.5390
±0.0474 | This paper |
| 82 | MatrixFactorization | 0.1368
±0.0475 | This paper |
| # | Model | Hits@100 ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OGB Leader | 0.6524
±0.0150 | |
| 2 | PRB | 0.6347
±0.0175 | |
| 3 | LPFormer | 0.6332
±0.0063 | |
| 14 | SAGE | 0.5013
±0.0055 | |
| 24 | ML | 0.4600 | This paper |
| 23 | MLP | 0.4600 | This paper |
| 44 | MatrixFactorization | 0.3229
±0.0094 | This paper |
| 45 | GCN | 0.3084
±0.0178 best reported | best today: Link Prediction with Untrained Message Passing Layers (2024) |
| 57 | Node2Vec | 0.2230
±0.0080 best reported | best today: Formatting Instructions for ICLR 2021 Conference Submissions (2020) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 63 | GraphSAGE | 0.1655
±0.0240 | This paper |
| # | Model | MRR ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CFG | 0.8997
±0.0015 | |
| 2 | SIEG | 0.8987
±0.0018 | |
| 3 | LPFormer | 0.8981
±0.0013 | |
| 12 | GCN | 0.8705
±0.0004 best reported | best today: On the Impact of Feature Heterophily on Link Prediction with Graph Neural Networks (NeurIPS 2024) |
| 30 | SAGE | 0.8292
±0.0022 | |
| 32 | GraphSAGE | 0.8264
±0.0001 best reported | best today: Neo-GNNs: Neighborhood Overlap-aware Graph Neural Networks for Link Prediction (NeurIPS 2022) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 40 | NeighborSampling | 0.8044
±0.0010 | This paper |
| 42 | ClusterGCN | 0.8004
±0.0025 | This paper |
| 43 | GraphSAINT | 0.7985
±0.0040 | This paper |
| 59 | Node2Vec | 0.6141
±0.0011 | This paper |
| 63 | MatrixFactorization | 0.5186
±0.0443 | This paper |
| 71 | MLP | 0.3917
±0.0044 best reported | best today: Weak Models Can be Good Teachers: A Case Study on Link Prediction with MLPs (2025) |
| # | Model | MRR ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | InterHT + DigPiece | 0.7293
±0.0018 | |
| 2 | StarGraph + TripleRE' | 0.7290 | |
| 3 | TripleRE + StarGraph | 0.7201
±0.0011 | |
| 32 | RotatE (5×dim) | 0.4332
±0.0025 | This paper |
| 34 | TransE (5×dim) | 0.4256
±0.0030 | This paper |
| 37 | ComplEx (5×dim) | 0.4027
±0.0027 | This paper |
| 40 | DistMult (5×dim) | 0.3729
±0.0045 | This paper |
| # | Model | MRR ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PairRE+LRE | 0.8360 | |
| 2 | NBFnet | 0.8317 | |
| 3 | AutoSF | 0.8309
±0.0008 | |
| 7 | ComplEx | 0.8095
±0.0007 | This paper |
| 8 | DistMult | 0.8043
±0.0003 | This paper |
| 9 | RotatE | 0.7989
±0.0004 | This paper |
| 11 | TransE | 0.7452
±0.0004 | This paper |
