GraphNorm: A Principled Approach to Accelerating Graph Neural Network Training
Abstract
Normalization plays an important role in the optimization of deep neural networks. While there are standard normalization methods in computer vision and natural language processing, there is limited understanding of how to effectively normalize neural networks for graph representation learning. In this paper, we propose a principled normalization method, Graph Normalization (GraphNorm), where the key idea is to normalize the feature values across all nodes for each individual graph with a learnable shift. Theoretically, we show that GraphNorm serves as a preconditioner that smooths the distribution of the graph aggregation's spectrum, leading to faster optimization. Such an improvement cannot be well obtained if we use currently popular normalization methods, such as BatchNorm, which normalizes the nodes in a batch rather than in individual graphs, due to heavy batch noises. Moreover, we show that for some highly regular graphs, the mean of the feature values contains graph structural information, and directly subtracting the mean may lead to an expressiveness degradation. The learnable shift in GraphNorm enables the model to learn to avoid such degradation for those cases. Empirically, Graph neural networks (GNNs) with GraphNorm converge much faster compared to GNNs with other normalization methods, e.g., BatchNorm. GraphNorm also improves generalization of GNNs, achieving better performance on graph classification benchmarks.
Benchmark Results
Tested on 5 datasets 1 baseline value reported too low
Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).
TU Dortmund
| # | Model | Accuracy ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MSH-GNN | 0.9910
±0.0030 | |
| 2 | ID-GNN+BEC | 0.9830
±0.0360 | |
| 3 | SupCosine | 0.9830
±0.0250 | |
| 39 | GIN | 0.9330
±0.0290 | |
| 85 | GIN+GraphNorm | 0.9160
±0.0650 | This paper |
| 150 | GIN + InstanceNorm | 0.9050
±0.0780 | This paper |
| 250 | GIN + BatchNorm | 0.8940
±0.0560 | This paper |
| 403 | MLP | 0.8660
±0.0495 | |
| 554 | GIN+LayerNorm | 0.8240
±0.0640 | This paper |
| # | Model | Accuracy ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WL-MLP | 0.9954 | |
| 2 | GIN | 0.9934 | |
| 3 | GCN | 0.9727 | |
| 95 | GIN + BatchNorm | 0.8270
±0.0170 | This paper |
| 131 | GraphSAGE | 0.8200
±0.0100 | |
| 157 | GIN+GraphNorm | 0.8140
±0.0240 | This paper |
| 173 | GIN + InstanceNorm | 0.8120
±0.0180 | This paper |
| 307 | GIN+LayerNorm | 0.7830
±0.0170 | This paper |
| 540 | DCNN | 0.6261 best reported |
| # | Model | Accuracy ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WL-MLP | 0.9792 | |
| 2 | MSH-GNN | 0.9640
±0.0070 | |
| 3 | CoCN | 0.8722
±0.0013 | |
| 23 | GCN | 0.8260
±0.0220 | |
| 116 | GIN+GraphNorm | 0.8020
±0.0100 | This paper |
| 115 | GIN + BatchNorm | 0.8020
±0.0190 | This paper |
| 124 | GIN+LayerNorm | 0.8010
±0.0080 | This paper |
| 128 | GIN + InstanceNorm | 0.8000
±0.0210 | This paper |
| 151 | MLP | 0.7920
±0.0240 |
| # | Model | Accuracy ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OEPG | 0.9630
±0.0090 | |
| 2 | MSH-GNN | 0.9580
±0.0090 | |
| 3 | GNN-AK+ | 0.9480
±0.0080 | |
| 5 | GraphNorm | 0.9350
±0.0210 | This paper |
| 8 | GIN + InstanceNorm | 0.9320
±0.0170 | This paper |
| 14 | GIN + BatchNorm | 0.9240
±0.0250 | This paper |
| 13 | GIN | 0.9240
±0.0250 | |
| 68 | GIN+LayerNorm | 0.8280
±0.0770 | This paper |
OGB
| # | Model | ROC-AUC ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Multi-RF Fusion with Multi-GNN Blending | 0.8476
±0.0002 | |
| 2 | HyperFusion | 0.8475
±0.0003 | |
| 3 | PAS+FPs | 0.8420
±0.0015 | |
| 9 | GatedGCN | 0.8090
±0.0160 | |
| 71 | GCN+GraphNorm | 0.7880
±0.0100 best reported | best at pub: Wasserstein Embedding for Graph Learning (ICLR 2020) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 91 | GCN+InstanceNorm | 0.7818
±0.0042 | This paper |
| 97 | GIN+GraphNorm | 0.7808
±0.0116 best reported | best today: GRANOLA: Adaptive Normalization for Graph Neural Networks (NeurIPS 2024) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 109 | GIN | 0.7558
±0.0140 | prev best: Rethinking Graph Regularization for Graph Neural Networks (AAAI 2020) Improvement within reported uncertainty; not highlighted. |
| 118 | GIN + InstanceNorm | 0.7754
±0.0127 | This paper |
| 160 | GraphSAGE | 0.7690
±0.0136 | |
| 169 | GIN + BatchNorm | 0.7661
±0.0097 | This paper |
| 184 | GCN | 0.7630
±0.0030 best reported | best at pub: Rethinking Graph Regularization for Graph Neural Networks (AAAI 2020) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 186 | GCN+BatchNorm | 0.7622
±0.0095 | This paper |
| 238 | GCN+LayerNorm | 0.7504
±0.0048 | This paper |
| 243 | GIN+LayerNorm | 0.7479
±0.0092 | This paper |
