AAAI 2021

Beyond Low-frequency Information in Graph Convolutional Networks

Deyu Bo, Xiao Wang, C. Shi, Huawei Shen

Main figure for Beyond Low-frequency Information in Graph Convolutional Networks

Abstract

Graph neural networks (GNNs) have been proven to be effective in various network-related tasks. Most existing GNNs usually exploit the low-frequency signals of node features, which gives rise to one fundamental question: is the low-frequency information all we need in the real world applications? In this paper, we first present an experimental investigation assessing the roles of low-frequency and high-frequency signals, where the results clearly show that exploring low-frequency signal only is distant from learning an effective node representation in different scenarios. How can we adaptively learn more information beyond low-frequency information in GNNs? A well-informed answer can help GNNs enhance the adaptability. We tackle this challenge and propose a novel Frequency Adaptation Graph Convolutional Networks (FAGCN) with a self-gating mechanism, which can adaptively integrate different signals in the process of message passing. For a deeper understanding, we theoretically analyze the roles of low-frequency signals and high-frequency signals on learning node representations, which further explains why FAGCN can perform well on different types of networks. Extensive experiments on six real-world networks validate that FAGCN not only alleviates the over-smoothing problem, but also has advantages over the state-of-the-arts.

Proposed method: FAGCN

Benchmark Results

Tested on 1 dataset 1 baseline value reported too low

Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).

Heterophilic Graphs

#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
DiGGR
0.4535 ±0.0353
2
TRIGON
0.4402 ±0.0028
3
DoG
0.4320 ±0.0120
42
MLP
actual #42 vs paper #359 317 places worse
0.4026 ±0.0108
best reported
actual #42 vs paper #359 317 places worse
paper 0.2970
paper 0.2970 Δ at pub 0.0606 Δ today 0.1056
56
FAGCN
0.3970
This paper
68
GraphSAGE
0.3899 ±0.0085
87
Geom-GCN
actual #87 vs paper #87
0.3810
actual #87 vs paper #87
paper 0.3810
paper 0.3810 Δ at pub 0.0650
135
GCN
actual #135 vs paper #135
0.3690
actual #135 vs paper #135
paper 0.3690
paper 0.3690 Δ at pub 0.0660
SOTA performance (not significantly different from the best) Proposed method (this paper) Global context (other papers) Best at pub — reported result worse than the best known when published (best reported in green) Best at pub — reported value improved over the best known when published