Generative and Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning for Graph Anomaly Detection

Yu Zheng, Ming Jin, Yixin Liu, Lianhua Chi, K. Phan, Yi-Ping Phoebe Chen

Main figure for Generative and Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning for Graph Anomaly Detection

Abstract

Anomaly detection from graph data has drawn much attention due to its practical significance in many critical applications including cybersecurity, finance, and social networks. Existing data mining and machine learning methods are either shallow methods that could not effectively capture the complex interdependency of graph data or graph autoencoder methods that could not fully exploit the contextual information as supervision signals for effective anomaly detection. To overcome these challenges, in this paper, we propose a novel method, Self-Supervised Learning for Graph Anomaly Detection (SL-GAD). Our method constructs different contextual subgraphs (views) based on a target node and employs two modules, generative attribute regression and multi-view contrastive learning for anomaly detection. While the generative attribute regression module allows us to capture the anomalies in the attribute space, the multi-view contrastive learning module can exploit richer structure information from multiple subgraphs, thus abling to capture the anomalies in the structure space, mixing of structure, and attribute information. We conduct extensive experiments on six benchmark datasets and the results demonstrate that our method outperforms state-of-the-art methods by a large margin.

Proposed method: SL-GAD

Benchmark Results

Tested on 1 dataset Non-standard metric on 1 dataset

Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).

Heterogeneous Graph Benchmarks

ACM

Global leaderboard →
Non-default metric. This paper reports ROC-AUC; the dataset default is Micro-F1. Values below use ROC-AUC only.

Sorted by ROC-AUC. Highlighted rows are from other papers.

#ModelROC-AUC ↑Paper
1
SL-GAD
0.8538
This paper
2
CoLA
0.8237
This paper
3
DOMINANT
0.7601
This paper
4
Radar
0.7247
This paper
5
ANOMALOUS
0.7038
This paper
6
DGI
0.6240
This paper
7
AMEN
0.5626
This paper
SOTA performance (not significantly different from the best) Proposed method (this paper) Baseline / comparison (this paper)