Decoupling the Depth and Scope of Graph Neural Networks
Abstract
State-of-the-art Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have limited scalability with respect to the graph and model sizes. On large graphs, increasing the model depth often means exponential expansion of the scope (, receptive field). Beyond just a few layers, two fundamental challenges emerge: degraded expressivity due to oversmoothing, and expensive computation due to neighborhood explosion. We propose a design principle to decouple the depth and scope of GNNs -- to generate representation of a target entity (, a node or an edge), we first extract a localized subgraph as the bounded-size scope, and then apply a GNN of arbitrary depth on top of the subgraph. A properly extracted subgraph consists of a small number of critical neighbors, while excluding irrelevant ones. The GNN, no matter how deep it is, smooths the local neighborhood into informative representation rather than oversmoothing the global graph into ``white noise''. Theoretically, decoupling improves the GNN expressive power from the perspectives of graph signal processing (GCN), function approximation (GraphSAGE) and topological learning (GIN). Empirically, on seven graphs (with up to 110M nodes) and six backbone GNN architectures, our design achieves significant accuracy improvement with orders of magnitude reduction in computation and hardware cost.
Benchmark Results
Tested on 1 dataset 1 baseline value reported too low
Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).
OGB
| # | Model | Hits@50 ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PROXI | 0.7650
±0.0027 | |
| 2 | OGB Leader | 0.7129
±0.0018 | |
| 3 | GIDN | 0.7096
±0.0055 | |
| 9 | GCN | 0.6621
±0.0033 | |
| 20 | SEAL | 0.6474
±0.0043 best reported | best at pub: Labeling Trick: A Theory of Using Graph Neural Networks for Multi-Node Representation Learning (NeurIPS 2020) best today: Node Identifiers: Compact, Discrete Representations for Efficient Graph Learning (ICLR 2024) |
| 36 | shaDow-SAGE | 0.5492
±0.0022 | This paper |
| 52 | DeeperGCN | 0.5273
±0.0047 | This paper |
| 55 | LRGA+GCN | 0.5221
±0.0072 | prev best: Formatting Instructions for ICLR 2021 Conference Submissions (2020) Improvement within reported uncertainty; not highlighted. |
| 94 | MLP | 0.4438
±0.0347 |
