Simple Contrastive Graph Clustering
Abstract
Contrastive learning has recently attracted plenty of attention in deep graph clustering for its promising performance. However, complicated data augmentations and time-consuming graph convolutional operation undermine the efficiency of these methods. To solve this problem, we propose a Simple Contrastive Graph Clustering (SCGC) algorithm to improve the existing methods from the perspectives of network architecture, data augmentation, and objective function. As to the architecture, our network includes two main parts, i.e., pre-processing and network backbone. A simple low-pass denoising operation conducts neighbor information aggregation as an independent pre-processing, and only two multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) are included as the backbone. For data augmentation, instead of introducing complex operations over graphs, we construct two augmented views of the same vertex by designing parameter un-shared siamese encoders and perturbing the node embeddings directly. Finally, as to the objective function, to further improve the clustering performance, a novel cross-view structural consistency objective function is designed to enhance the discriminative capability of the learned network. Extensive experimental results on seven benchmark datasets validate our proposed algorithm's effectiveness and superiority. Significantly, our algorithm outperforms the recent contrastive deep clustering competitors with at least seven times speedup on average.
Benchmark Results
Tested on 4 datasets 6 baseline values reported too low Non-standard metric on 1 dataset
Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).
Hypergraph Benchmarks
AMAP
Global leaderboard →Sorted by F1. Highlighted rows are from other papers.
| # | Model | F1 ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GANN | 0.9405
±0.0037 | |
| 2 | GPRGNN | 0.9308
±0.0026 | |
| 3 | GAT | 0.9238
±0.0014 | |
| 14 | GCN | 0.8115
±0.0105 | |
| 16 | DFCN | 0.7600
±0.0080 best reported | best at pub: Improved Dual Correlation Reduction Network (2022) |
| 20 | SCAGC | 0.7277
±0.0016 | This paper |
| 21 | SCGC | 0.7222
±0.0097 | This paper |
| 23 | AGE | 0.7174
±0.0093 | This paper |
| 26 | DAEGC | 0.6987
±0.0054 | prev best: Improved Dual Correlation Reduction Network (2022) |
| 29 | GAE | 0.6808
±0.0176 | prev best: Improved Dual Correlation Reduction Network (2022) |
| 31 | SDCN | 0.6805
±0.0181 best reported | best at pub: Improved Dual Correlation Reduction Network (2022) |
| 35 | ARGA | 0.6483
±0.0059 best reported | best at pub: Improved Dual Correlation Reduction Network (2022) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 40 | DEC | 0.5816
±0.0056 best reported | best at pub: Improved Dual Correlation Reduction Network (2022) |
| 44 | SSGC | 0.5279
±0.0001 | This paper |
| 45 | AE | 0.5143
±0.0035 best reported | best at pub: Improved Dual Correlation Reduction Network (2022) |
| 50 | MVGRL | 0.4600 best reported | best at pub: Improved Dual Correlation Reduction Network (2022) best today: CDC: A Simple Framework for Complex Data Clustering (2024) |
| 54 | K-means | 0.3192
±0.0027 best reported | best at pub: Improved Dual Correlation Reduction Network (2022) |
| # | Model | F1 ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SCAGC | 0.7277
±0.0016 | This paper |
| 2 | SCGC | 0.7222
±0.0097 | This paper |
| 3 | AGE | 0.7174
±0.0093 | This paper |
| 4 | DAEGC | 0.6987
±0.0054 | This paper |
| 5 | GAE | 0.6808
±0.0176 | This paper |
| 6 | DFCN | 0.6718
±0.0013 | This paper |
| 7 | ARGA | 0.6430
±0.0195 | This paper |
| 16 | SSGC | 0.5279
±0.0001 | This paper |
| 22 | SDCN | 0.5066
±0.0149 | This paper |
| 24 | MVGRL | 0.4900
±0.0400 best reported | best today: Non-Dissipative Graph Propagation for Non-Local Community Detection (2025) |
| 27 | AE | 0.4787
±0.0020 | This paper |
| 28 | DEC | 0.4671
±0.0012 | This paper |
| 35 | K-means | 0.2396
±0.0051 | This paper |
| # | Model | F1 ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GraphLearner | 0.7540
±0.0088 | |
| 2 | SCGDN | 0.7449
±0.0026 | |
| 3 | SCGC | 0.7222
±0.0097 | This paper |
| 4 | ARGA | 0.7174
±0.0093 | This paper |
| 6 | AGE | 0.7125
±0.0031 | This paper |
| 5 | SDCN | 0.7125
±0.0031 | This paper |
| 7 | MVGRL | 0.7047
±0.0370 | This paper |
| 8 | DAEGC | 0.6987
±0.0054 | This paper |
| 9 | GAE | 0.6808
±0.0176 | This paper |
| 19 | AE | 0.4787
±0.0020 | This paper |
| 20 | DEC | 0.4671
±0.0012 | This paper |
| 29 | K-means | 0.2396
±0.0051 | This paper |
| # | Model | F1 ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SCAGC | 0.7277
±0.0016 | This paper |
| 2 | SCGC | 0.7222
±0.0097 | This paper |
| 3 | AGE | 0.7174
±0.0093 | This paper |
| 4 | DFCN | 0.7125
±0.0031 | This paper |
| 5 | DAEGC | 0.6987
±0.0054 | This paper |
| 6 | GAE | 0.6808
±0.0176 | This paper |
| 7 | ARGA | 0.6430
±0.0195 | This paper |
| 11 | SSGC | 0.5279
±0.0001 | This paper |
| 12 | SDCN | 0.5066
±0.0149 | This paper |
| 15 | AE | 0.4787
±0.0020 | This paper |
| 17 | MVGRL | 0.4700
±0.0600 best reported | best today: Non-Dissipative Graph Propagation for Non-Local Community Detection (2025) |
| 19 | DEC | 0.4671
±0.0012 | This paper |
| 30 | K-means | 0.2396
±0.0051 | This paper |
