AAAI 2022

Energy-Motivated Equivariant Pretraining for 3D Molecular Graphs

Rui Jiao, Jiaqi Han, Wenbing Huang, Yu Rong, Yang Liu

Main figure for Energy-Motivated Equivariant Pretraining for 3D Molecular Graphs

Abstract

Pretraining molecular representation models without labels is fundamental to various applications. Conventional methods mainly process 2D molecular graphs and focus solely on 2D tasks, making their pretrained models incapable of characterizing 3D geometry and thus defective for downstream 3D tasks. In this work, we tackle 3D molecular pretraining in a complete and novel sense. In particular, we first propose to adopt an equivariant energy-based model as the backbone for pretraining, which enjoys the merits of fulfilling the symmetry of 3D space. Then we develop a node-level pretraining loss for force prediction, where we further exploit the Riemann-Gaussian distribution to ensure the loss to be E(3)-invariant, enabling more robustness. Moreover, a graph-level noise scale prediction task is also leveraged to further promote the eventual performance. We evaluate our model pretrained from a large-scale 3D dataset GEOM-QM9 on two challenging 3D benchmarks: MD17 and QM9. Experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of our method against current state-of-the-art pretraining approaches, and verify the validity of our design for each proposed component. Code is available at.

Proposed method: 3D-EMGP

Benchmark Results

Tested on 1 dataset

Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).

Quantum Chemistry

#ModelMAE ↓Paper
1
QHNet
0.0000
2
QHNetV2
0.0000
3
PhiSNet
0.0000
68
3D-EMGP
0.0876
This paper
72
PosPred
0.0945
This paper
73
GraphCL
0.0953
This paper
75
GEM
0.0995
This paper
76
JOAO
0.1033
This paper
77
GPT-GNN
0.1050
This paper
79
JOAOv2
0.1073
This paper
80
AttrMask
0.1089
This paper
81
EdgePred
0.1120
This paper
83
GraphMVP
0.1166
This paper
84
Base
0.1191
This paper
85
GCC
0.1192
This paper
88
3D Infomax
0.1296
This paper
93
InfoGraph
0.1463
This paper
SOTA performance (not significantly different from the best) Proposed method (this paper) Baseline / comparison (this paper) Global context (other papers)