GEM-2: Next Generation Molecular Property Prediction Network by Modeling Full-range Many-body Interactions

Lihang Liu, Donglong He, Xiaomin Fang, Shanzhuo Zhang, Fan Wang, Jingzhou He, Hua Wu

Main figure for GEM-2: Next Generation Molecular Property Prediction Network by Modeling Full-range Many-body Interactions

Abstract

Molecular property prediction is a fundamental task in the drug and material industries. Physically, the properties of a molecule are determined by its own electronic structure, which is a quantum many-body system and can be exactly described by the Schrödinger equation. Full-range many-body interactions between electrons have been proven effective in obtaining an accurate solution of the Schrödinger equation by classical computational chemistry methods, although modeling such interactions consumes an expensive computational cost. Meanwhile, deep learning methods have also demonstrated their competence in molecular property prediction tasks. Inspired by the classical computational chemistry methods, we design a novel method, namely GEM-2, which comprehensively considers full-range many-body interactions in molecules. Multiple tracks are utilized to model the full-range interactions between the many-bodies with different orders, and a novel axial attention mechanism is designed to approximate the full-range interaction modeling with much lower computational cost. Extensive experiments demonstrate the overwhelming superiority of GEM-2 over multiple baseline methods in quantum chemistry and drug discovery tasks. The ablation studies also verify the effectiveness of the full-range many-body interactions.

Proposed method: GEM-2

Benchmark Results

Tested on 1 dataset 3 baseline values reported too low

Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).

OGB

#ModelMAE ↓Paper
1
DeMol
0.0603
2
TGT-At
0.0671
3
TGT-At (+RDKit)
0.0683
9
GEM-2
actual #9 vs paper #11 2 places worse
0.0793
best reported
actual #9 vs paper #11 2 places worse
paper 0.0806
29
EGT
actual #29 vs paper #29
0.0862
actual #29 vs paper #29
paper 0.0862
paper 0.0862 Δ at pub 0.0007
32
GRPE-Large
actual #32 vs paper #34 2 places worse
0.0867
best reported
actual #32 vs paper #34 2 places worse
paper 0.0876
best today: IJCAI--23 Formatting Instructions (IJCAI 2023)
paper 0.0876 Δ today 0.0009
44
TokenGT
actual #44 vs paper #46 2 places worse
0.0910
best reported
actual #44 vs paper #46 2 places worse
paper 0.0919
59
GIN-virtual
actual #59 vs paper #59
0.1083
best reported
actual #59 vs paper #59
paper 0.1084
paper 0.1084 Δ at pub 0.0001
61
GCN-virtual
actual #61 vs paper #61
0.1152
actual #61 vs paper #61
paper 0.1152
paper 0.1152 Δ at pub 0.0001
65
GCN
actual #65 vs paper #77 12 places worse
0.1195
best reported
actual #65 vs paper #77 12 places worse
paper 0.1398
paper 0.1398 Δ at pub 0.0019 Δ today 0.0203
64
GIN
actual #64 vs paper #66 2 places worse
0.1195
best reported
actual #64 vs paper #66 2 places worse
paper 0.1218
SOTA performance (not significantly different from the best) Global context (other papers) Best at pub — reported result worse than the best known when published (best reported in green) Best at pub — reported value improved over the best known when published Best today — OK at publication; today's leaderboard best is elsewhere