Equivariant 3D-Conditional Diffusion Models for Molecular Linker Design

Ilia Igashov, Hannes Stärk, Clément Vignac, Arne Schneuing, Victor Garcia Satorras, Pascal Frossard, Max Welling, Michael M. Bronstein, Bruno E. Correia

Main figure for Equivariant 3D-Conditional Diffusion Models for Molecular Linker Design

Abstract

Fragment-based drug discovery has been an effective paradigm in early-stage drug development. An open challenge in this area is designing linkers between disconnected molecular fragments of interest to obtain chemically-relevant candidate drug molecules. In this work, we propose DiffLinker, an E(3)-equivariant 3D-conditional diffusion model for molecular linker design. Given a set of disconnected fragments, our model places missing atoms in between and designs a molecule incorporating all the initial fragments. Unlike previous approaches that are only able to connect pairs of molecular fragments, our method can link an arbitrary number of fragments. Additionally, the model automatically determines the number of atoms in the linker and its attachment points to the input fragments. We demonstrate that DiffLinker outperforms other methods on the standard datasets generating more diverse and synthetically-accessible molecules. Besides, we experimentally test our method in real-world applications, showing that it can successfully generate valid linkers conditioned on target protein pockets.

Proposed method: DiffLinker

Benchmark Results

Tested on 1 dataset Non-standard metric on 1 dataset

Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).

Classic

ZINC

Global leaderboard →

Default metric is MAE. The paper reports 0 values on MAE , 3 values on QED , 3 values on SA , 3 values on Recovery and 1 value on RMSD .

Sorted by QED. Highlighted rows are from other papers.

#ModelMAE ↑ defaultQED ↑SA ↑Recovery ↑RMSD ↑Paper
1
DiffLinker
—
0.6800
3.0100
0.8720
0.3200
MAE —
SA 3.0100
Recovery 0.8720
RMSD 0.3200
This paper
2
3DLinker (given anchors)
—
0.6500
3.1100
0.9400
—
MAE —
SA 3.1100
Recovery 0.9400
RMSD —
This paper
3
DeLinker + ConfVAE + MMFF
—
0.6400
3.1100
0.8020
—
MAE —
SA 3.1100
Recovery 0.8020
RMSD —
This paper
SOTA performance (not significantly different from the best) Proposed method (this paper) Baseline / comparison (this paper)