Graph Self-Contrast Representation Learning

Minjie Chen, Yao Cheng, Ye Wang, Xiangci Li, Ming Gao

Main figure for Graph Self-Contrast Representation Learning

Abstract

Graph contrastive learning (GCL) has recently emerged as a promising approach for graph representation learning. Some existing methods adopt the 1-vs-$K$ scheme to construct one positive and $K$ negative samples for each graph, but it is difficult to set $K$. For those methods that do not use negative samples, it is often necessary to add additional strategies to avoid model collapse, which could only alleviate the problem to some extent. All these drawbacks will undoubtedly have an adverse impact on the generalizability and efficiency of the model. In this paper, to address these issues, we propose a novel graph self-contrast framework GraphSC, which only uses one positive and one negative sample, and chooses triplet loss as the objective. Specifically, self-contrast has two implications. First, GraphSC generates both positive and negative views of a graph sample from the graph itself via graph augmentation functions of various intensities, and use them for self-contrast. Second, GraphSC uses Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) to factorize the representations into multiple factors and proposes a masked self-contrast mechanism to better separate positive and negative samples. Further, Since the triplet loss only optimizes the relative distance between the anchor and its positive/negative samples, it is difficult to ensure the absolute distance between the anchor and positive sample. Therefore, we explicitly reduced the absolute distance between the anchor and positive sample to accelerate convergence. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the performance of GraphSC against 19 other state-of-the-art methods in both unsupervised and transfer learning settings.

Benchmark Results

Tested on 10 datasets 38 baseline values reported too low

Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).

TU Dortmund

#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
MSH-GNN
0.9910 ±0.0030
2
ID-GNN+BEC
0.9830 ±0.0360
3
SupCosine
0.9830 ±0.0250
39
GIN
0.9330 ±0.0290
159
WL
actual #159 vs paper #596 437 places worse
0.9040 ±0.0570
best reported
actual #159 vs paper #596 437 places worse
paper 0.8072 ±0.0300
paper 0.8072 ±0.0300 Δ at pub 0.0968
178
AD-GCL
actual #178 vs paper #294 116 places worse
0.9028 ±0.0401
best reported
actual #178 vs paper #294 116 places worse
paper 0.8874 ±0.0185

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8874 ±0.0185 Δ at pub 0.0096 Δ today 0.0154
180
LaGraph
0.9020 ±0.0110
This paper
222
JOAOv2
actual #222 vs paper #353 131 places worse
0.8967 ±0.0524
best reported
actual #222 vs paper #353 131 places worse
paper 0.8767 ±0.0079
best at pub: Graph Contrastive Learning Automated (ICML 2021)

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8767 ±0.0079 Δ today 0.0200
257
InfoGraph
actual #257 vs paper #272 15 places worse
0.8930 ±0.0514
best reported
actual #257 vs paper #272 15 places worse
paper 0.8901 ±0.0113

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8901 ±0.0113 Δ at pub 0.0029
269
GraphSC
0.8919 ±0.0183
This paper
272
SimGRACE
actual #272 vs paper #272
0.8910 ±0.0140
best reported
actual #272 vs paper #272
paper 0.8901 ±0.0131

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8901 ±0.0131 Δ today 0.0009
330
GraphSC-MSE
0.8804 ±0.0156
This paper
351
JOAO
actual #351 vs paper #370 19 places worse
0.8770 ±0.0080
best reported
actual #351 vs paper #370 19 places worse
paper 0.8735 ±0.0102

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8735 ±0.0102 Δ at pub 0.0035 Δ today 0.0035
354
GraphCL
actual #354 vs paper #396 42 places worse
0.8766 ±0.0103
best reported
actual #354 vs paper #396 42 places worse
paper 0.8680 ±0.0134

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8680 ±0.0134 Δ at pub 0.0086
355
RGCL
0.8766 ±0.0101
This paper
365
DGK
0.8744 ±0.0272
This paper
403
MLP
0.8660 ±0.0495
407
graph2vec
actual #407 vs paper #517 110 places worse
0.8644 ±0.0125
best reported
actual #407 vs paper #517 110 places worse
paper 0.8315 ±0.0925

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8315 ±0.0925 Δ at pub 0.0329
444
GL
actual #444 vs paper #577 133 places worse
0.8520 ±0.0090
best reported
actual #444 vs paper #577 133 places worse
paper 0.8166 ±0.0211
paper 0.8166 ±0.0211 Δ at pub 0.0354
472
Sub2Vec
actual #472 vs paper #786 314 places worse
0.8447 ±0.0037
best reported
actual #472 vs paper #786 314 places worse
paper 0.6105 ±0.1580

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.6105 ±0.1580 Δ at pub 0.2342
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
WL-MLP
0.9954
2
GIN
0.9934
3
GCN
0.9727
12
WL
actual #12 vs paper #223 211 places worse
0.8590 ±0.0010
best reported
actual #12 vs paper #223 211 places worse
paper 0.8001 ±0.0050
best at pub: Propagation Kernels (2014)
paper 0.8001 ±0.0050 Δ at pub 0.0589
104
GraphCL
actual #104 vs paper #325 221 places worse
0.8250 ±0.0013
best reported
actual #104 vs paper #325 221 places worse
paper 0.7787 ±0.0041
paper 0.7787 ±0.0041 Δ at pub 0.0463
131
GraphSAGE
0.8200 ±0.0100
141
SimGRACE
actual #141 vs paper #258 117 places worse
0.8180 ±0.0015
best reported
actual #141 vs paper #258 117 places worse
paper 0.7912 ±0.0044
paper 0.7912 ±0.0044 Δ at pub 0.0268
146
JOAOv2
actual #146 vs paper #303 157 places worse
0.8170 ±0.0026
best reported
actual #146 vs paper #303 157 places worse
paper 0.7836 ±0.0053
paper 0.7836 ±0.0053 Δ at pub 0.0334
176
GraphSC
0.8112 ±0.0040
This paper
207
GraphSC-MSE
0.8039 ±0.0062
This paper
210
DGK
0.8031 ±0.0046
This paper
227
LaGraph
0.7990 ±0.0050
This paper
301
JOAO
actual #301 vs paper #317 16 places worse
0.7840 ±0.0050
best reported
actual #301 vs paper #317 16 places worse
paper 0.7807 ±0.0047

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7807 ±0.0047 Δ at pub 0.0033
315
RGCL
0.7814 ±0.0108
This paper
338
InfoGraph
actual #338 vs paper #386 48 places worse
0.7750 ±0.0074
best reported
actual #338 vs paper #386 48 places worse
paper 0.7620 ±0.0106

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7620 ±0.0106 Δ at pub 0.0130
406
graph2vec
actual #406 vs paper #446 40 places worse
0.7540 ±0.0120
best reported
actual #406 vs paper #446 40 places worse
paper 0.7322 ±0.0181

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7322 ±0.0181 Δ at pub 0.0218
409
AD-GCL
actual #409 vs paper #439 30 places worse
0.7518 ±0.0031
best reported
actual #409 vs paper #439 30 places worse
paper 0.7391 ±0.0077
paper 0.7391 ±0.0077 Δ at pub 0.0127 Δ today 0.0127
557
Sub2Vec
actual #557 vs paper #575 18 places worse
0.5976 ±0.0035
best reported
actual #557 vs paper #575 18 places worse
paper 0.5284 ±0.0147
paper 0.5284 ±0.0147 Δ at pub 0.0692
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
WL-MLP
0.9792
2
MSH-GNN
0.9640 ±0.0070
3
CoCN
0.8722 ±0.0013
23
GCN
0.8260 ±0.0220
32
JOAOv2
actual #32 vs paper #305 273 places worse
0.8216 ±0.0017
best reported
actual #32 vs paper #305 273 places worse
paper 0.6933 ±0.0034
paper 0.6933 ±0.0034 Δ at pub 0.1283
37
SimGRACE
actual #37 vs paper #286 249 places worse
0.8188 ±0.0023
best reported
actual #37 vs paper #286 249 places worse
paper 0.7172 ±0.0082
paper 0.7172 ±0.0082 Δ at pub 0.1016
80
GraphCL
actual #80 vs paper #290 210 places worse
0.8108 ±0.0017
best reported
actual #80 vs paper #290 210 places worse
paper 0.7136 ±0.0115
paper 0.7136 ±0.0115 Δ at pub 0.0972
146
InfoGraph
actual #146 vs paper #295 149 places worse
0.7940
best reported
actual #146 vs paper #295 149 places worse
paper 0.7065 ±0.0113
paper 0.7065 ±0.0113 Δ at pub 0.0875
151
MLP
0.7920 ±0.0240
162
GraphSC
0.7890 ±0.0032
This paper
188
GraphSC-MSE
0.7764 ±0.0026
This paper
189
LaGraph
0.7760 ±0.0020
This paper
233
AD-GCL
actual #233 vs paper #284 51 places worse
0.7582 ±0.0026
best reported
actual #233 vs paper #284 51 places worse
paper 0.7202 ±0.0056
paper 0.7202 ±0.0056 Δ at pub 0.0380 Δ today 0.0380
248
JOAO
actual #248 vs paper #305 57 places worse
0.7535 ±0.0093
best reported
actual #248 vs paper #305 57 places worse
paper 0.6950 ±0.0036
paper 0.6950 ±0.0036 Δ at pub 0.0585
271
RGCL
actual #271 vs paper #293 22 places worse
0.7348 ±0.0093
best reported
actual #271 vs paper #293 22 places worse
paper 0.7092 ±0.0065
paper 0.7092 ±0.0065 Δ today 0.0256
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
OEPG
0.9630 ±0.0090
2
MSH-GNN
0.9580 ±0.0090
3
GNN-AK+
0.9480 ±0.0080
13
GIN
0.9240 ±0.0250
23
GraphCL
actual #23 vs paper #43 20 places worse
0.9169 ±0.0070
best reported
actual #23 vs paper #43 20 places worse
paper 0.8953 ±0.0084
best at pub: Graph Contrastive Learning Automated (ICML 2021)
paper 0.8953 ±0.0084 Δ today 0.0216
24
JOAO
actual #24 vs paper #63 39 places worse
0.9166 ±0.0059
best reported
actual #24 vs paper #63 39 places worse
paper 0.8529 ±0.0135
paper 0.8529 ±0.0135 Δ at pub 0.0285 Δ today 0.0637
26
RGCL
actual #26 vs paper #33 7 places worse
0.9138 ±0.0040
best reported
actual #26 vs paper #33 7 places worse
paper 0.9034 ±0.0058
paper 0.9034 ±0.0058 Δ today 0.0104
28
GraphSC
0.9108 ±0.0056
This paper
33
LaGraph
0.9040 ±0.0080
This paper
34
GraphSC-MSE
0.9026 ±0.0080
This paper
37
AD-GCL
actual #37 vs paper #37
0.9010 ±0.0015
best reported
actual #37 vs paper #37
paper 0.9007 ±0.0085

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.9007 ±0.0085 Δ at pub 0.0003
44
SimGRACE
0.8951 ±0.0089
This paper
46
InfoGraph
actual #46 vs paper #68 22 places worse
0.8939 ±0.0181
best reported
actual #46 vs paper #68 22 places worse
paper 0.8250 ±0.0142
paper 0.8250 ±0.0142 Δ at pub 0.0616 Δ today 0.0689
49
JOAOv2
actual #49 vs paper #58 9 places worse
0.8879 ±0.0065
best reported
actual #49 vs paper #58 9 places worse
paper 0.8642 ±0.0145
paper 0.8642 ±0.0145 Δ at pub 0.0237
73
DGK
0.7804 ±0.0039
This paper
75
GL
0.7734 ±0.0018
This paper
80
graph2vec
actual #80 vs paper #80
0.7580 ±0.0100
best reported
actual #80 vs paper #80
paper 0.7578 ±0.0103

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7578 ±0.0103 Δ at pub 0.0002 Δ today 0.0002
83
Sub2Vec
actual #83 vs paper #83
0.7150 ±0.0040
best reported
actual #83 vs paper #83
paper 0.7148 ±0.0041

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7148 ±0.0041 Δ at pub 0.0002
85
WL
0.6882 ±0.0041
This paper

MoleculeNet

#ModelROC-AUC ↑Paper
1
HIMP
0.8740 ±0.0050
2
GINE w/ VN
0.8720 ±0.0030
3
NaiveGINe+ K=3 w/ VN
0.8700 ±0.0040
14
GCN
0.8400 ±0.0040
31
JOAO
actual #31 vs paper #232 201 places worse
0.8230 ±0.0220
best reported
actual #31 vs paper #232 201 places worse
paper 0.7498 ±0.0029
paper 0.7498 ±0.0029 Δ at pub 0.0732
35
EdgePred
actual #35 vs paper #181 146 places worse
0.8180 ±0.0250
best reported
actual #35 vs paper #181 146 places worse
paper 0.7600 ±0.0060
paper 0.7600 ±0.0060 Δ at pub 0.0580
46
ContextPred
actual #46 vs paper #193 147 places worse
0.8060 ±0.0120
best reported
actual #46 vs paper #193 147 places worse
paper 0.7570 ±0.0070
paper 0.7570 ±0.0070 Δ at pub 0.0490
47
GraphCL
actual #47 vs paper #266 219 places worse
0.8050 ±0.0170
best reported
actual #47 vs paper #266 219 places worse
paper 0.7387 ±0.0066
paper 0.7387 ±0.0066 Δ at pub 0.0663
71
GraphLoG
actual #71 vs paper #242 171 places worse
0.7960 ±0.0250
best reported
actual #71 vs paper #242 171 places worse
paper 0.7465 ±0.0060
paper 0.7465 ±0.0060 Δ at pub 0.0495
163
AttrMasking
0.7670 ±0.0040
This paper
198
GraphSC
0.7558 ±0.0056
This paper
213
DGI
0.7530 ±0.0050
This paper
212
RGCL
actual #212 vs paper #219 7 places worse
0.7530 ±0.0050
best reported
actual #212 vs paper #219 7 places worse
paper 0.7520 ±0.0034

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7520 ±0.0034 Δ today 0.0010
240
AD-GCL
actual #240 vs paper #272 32 places worse
0.7470 ±0.0110
best reported
actual #240 vs paper #272 32 places worse
paper 0.7356 ±0.0072

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7356 ±0.0072 Δ today 0.0114
259
JOAOv2
0.7427 ±0.0062
This paper
264
No Pre-train
0.7400 ±0.0080
This paper
#ModelROC-AUC ↑Paper
1
ProtoMol
0.9140 ±0.0030
2
MMSG
0.9080 ±0.0050
3
MemGNN
0.9070
43
GIN
0.8646 ±0.0081
98
GraphLoG
actual #98 vs paper #115 17 places worse
0.8350 ±0.0120
best reported
actual #98 vs paper #115 17 places worse
paper 0.8260 ±0.0125

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8260 ±0.0125 Δ today 0.0090
100
JOAO
actual #100 vs paper #226 126 places worse
0.8340 ±0.0330
best reported
actual #100 vs paper #226 126 places worse
paper 0.7734 ±0.0048
paper 0.7734 ±0.0048 Δ at pub 0.0606
176
EdgePred
actual #176 vs paper #176
0.7990 ±0.0090
actual #176 vs paper #176
paper 0.7990 ±0.0090
paper 0.7990 ±0.0090 Δ at pub 0.1530
186
ContextPred
actual #186 vs paper #186
0.7960 ±0.0120
actual #186 vs paper #186
paper 0.7960 ±0.0120

Improvement within reported uncertainty; not highlighted.

paper 0.7960 ±0.0120 Δ at pub 0.0100
191
AttrMasking
0.7930 ±0.0160
This paper
202
AD-GCL
actual #202 vs paper #250 48 places worse
0.7900 ±0.0080
best reported
actual #202 vs paper #250 48 places worse
paper 0.7502 ±0.0188
paper 0.7502 ±0.0188 Δ today 0.0398
206
GraphSC
0.7882 ±0.0138
This paper
213
GraphCL
actual #213 vs paper #248 35 places worse
0.7820 ±0.0120
best reported
actual #213 vs paper #248 35 places worse
paper 0.7538 ±0.0144
paper 0.7538 ±0.0144 Δ at pub 0.0282
224
DGI
actual #224 vs paper #243 19 places worse
0.7780 ±0.0050
best reported
actual #224 vs paper #243 19 places worse
paper 0.7590 ±0.0160

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7590 ±0.0160 Δ today 0.0190
242
RGCL
0.7603 ±0.0077
This paper
248
JOAOv2
0.7549 ±0.0127
This paper
281
No Pre-train
0.7010 ±0.0540
This paper
#ModelROC-AUC ↑Paper
1
MAGPrompt+
0.9432 ±0.0238
2
CamS-LLaMA
0.9420
3
SE(3)-I MPPH
0.9400 ±0.0210
34
GIN
0.8875 ±0.0049
36
GraphCL
actual #36 vs paper #160 124 places worse
0.8870 ±0.0190
best reported
actual #36 vs paper #160 124 places worse
paper 0.6968 ±0.0067
paper 0.6968 ±0.0067 Δ at pub 0.1902
39
JOAO
actual #39 vs paper #139 100 places worse
0.8790 ±0.0200
best reported
actual #39 vs paper #139 100 places worse
paper 0.7022 ±0.0098
paper 0.7022 ±0.0098 Δ at pub 0.1768
40
ContextPred
actual #40 vs paper #201 161 places worse
0.8770 ±0.0260
best reported
actual #40 vs paper #201 161 places worse
paper 0.6800 ±0.0200
paper 0.6800 ±0.0200 Δ at pub 0.1970
44
EdgePred
actual #44 vs paper #225 181 places worse
0.8730 ±0.0160
best reported
actual #44 vs paper #225 181 places worse
paper 0.6730 ±0.0024
paper 0.6730 ±0.0024 Δ at pub 0.2000
54
GraphLoG
actual #54 vs paper #120 66 places worse
0.8460 ±0.0080
best reported
actual #54 vs paper #120 66 places worse
paper 0.7104 ±0.0186
paper 0.7104 ±0.0186 Δ at pub 0.1356
97
GraphSC
0.7216 ±0.0142
This paper
104
JOAOv2
actual #104 vs paper #117 13 places worse
0.7198 ±0.0018
best reported
actual #104 vs paper #117 13 places worse
paper 0.7139 ±0.0092

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7139 ±0.0092 Δ today 0.0059
117
RGCL
actual #117 vs paper #117
0.7142 ±0.0066
actual #117 vs paper #117
paper 0.7142 ±0.0066

Improvement within reported uncertainty; not highlighted.

paper 0.7142 ±0.0066 Δ at pub 0.0002
118
SimGRACE
0.7125 ±0.0086
This paper
144
AD-GCL
actual #144 vs paper #196 52 places worse
0.7010 ±0.0120
best reported
actual #144 vs paper #196 52 places worse
paper 0.6826 ±0.0103

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.6826 ±0.0103 Δ today 0.0184
184
DGI
0.6880 ±0.0080
This paper
230
AttrMasking
actual #230 vs paper #279 49 places worse
0.6712 ±0.0045
best reported
actual #230 vs paper #279 49 places worse
paper 0.6430 ±0.0280

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.6430 ±0.0280 Δ today 0.0282
257
No Pre-train
0.6580 ±0.0450
This paper
#ModelROC-AUC ↑Paper
1
SE(3)-I MPPH
0.9930 ±0.0040
2
KA-GCN
0.9920 ±0.0050
3
KA-GAT
0.9910 ±0.0050
19
GCN
0.9130 ±0.0170
57
RGCL
actual #57 vs paper #63 6 places worse
0.8500 ±0.0080
best reported
actual #57 vs paper #63 6 places worse
paper 0.8338 ±0.0091
paper 0.8338 ±0.0091 Δ at pub 0.0002 Δ today 0.0162
74
GraphSC
0.8229 ±0.0121
This paper
79
JOAO
actual #79 vs paper #79
0.8132 ±0.0249
actual #79 vs paper #79
paper 0.8132 ±0.0249

Improvement within reported uncertainty; not highlighted.

paper 0.8132 ±0.0249 Δ at pub 0.0002
80
JOAOv2
0.8097 ±0.0164
This paper
82
AD-GCL
actual #82 vs paper #107 25 places worse
0.8077 ±0.0392
best reported
actual #82 vs paper #107 25 places worse
paper 0.7763 ±0.0421

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7763 ±0.0421 Δ today 0.0314
97
GraphCL
actual #97 vs paper #121 24 places worse
0.7890 ±0.0420
best reported
actual #97 vs paper #121 24 places worse
paper 0.7599 ±0.0265

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7599 ±0.0265 Δ at pub 0.0291 Δ today 0.0291
103
GraphLoG
0.7872 ±0.0258
This paper
115
ContextPred
actual #115 vs paper #197 82 places worse
0.7720 ±0.0088
best reported
actual #115 vs paper #197 82 places worse
paper 0.6590 ±0.0380
162
AttrMasking
0.7180 ±0.0410
This paper
175
DGI
0.6990 ±0.0300
This paper
192
EdgePred
actual #192 vs paper #207 15 places worse
0.6730 ±0.0200
best reported
actual #192 vs paper #207 15 places worse
paper 0.6410 ±0.0370

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.6410 ±0.0370 Δ today 0.0320
232
No Pre-train
0.5800 ±0.0440
This paper
#ModelROC-AUC ↑Paper
1
KA-GAT
0.8470 ±0.0020
2
KA-GCN
0.8420 ±0.0010
3
GraphKAN
0.8370 ±0.0010
66
GIN
0.6403 ±0.0104
68
JOAO
actual #68 vs paper #183 115 places worse
0.6400 ±0.0100
best reported
actual #68 vs paper #183 115 places worse
paper 0.5997 ±0.0079
paper 0.5997 ±0.0079 Δ at pub 0.0403
103
ContextPred
actual #103 vs paper #144 41 places worse
0.6220 ±0.0059
best reported
actual #103 vs paper #144 41 places worse
paper 0.6090 ±0.0060
114
GraphCL
actual #114 vs paper #162 48 places worse
0.6183 ±0.0060
best reported
actual #114 vs paper #162 48 places worse
paper 0.6053 ±0.0088

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.6053 ±0.0088 Δ at pub 0.0027 Δ today 0.0130
123
GraphLoG
actual #123 vs paper #215 92 places worse
0.6150 ±0.0130
best reported
actual #123 vs paper #215 92 places worse
paper 0.5786 ±0.0144
paper 0.5786 ±0.0144 Δ at pub 0.0364
128
RGCL
actual #128 vs paper #130 2 places worse
0.6140 ±0.0060
best reported
actual #128 vs paper #130 2 places worse
paper 0.6138 ±0.0061

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.6138 ±0.0061 Δ at pub 0.0002 Δ today 0.0002
133
AttrMasking
actual #133 vs paper #141 8 places worse
0.6121 ±0.0065
best reported
actual #133 vs paper #141 8 places worse
paper 0.6100 ±0.0070

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.6100 ±0.0070 Δ today 0.0021
146
AD-GCL
actual #146 vs paper #198 52 places worse
0.6080 ±0.0090
best reported
actual #146 vs paper #198 52 places worse
paper 0.5924 ±0.0086
paper 0.5924 ±0.0086 Δ today 0.0156
156
SimGRACE
actual #156 vs paper #161 5 places worse
0.6060 ±0.0100
best reported
actual #156 vs paper #161 5 places worse
paper 0.6059 ±0.0096

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.6059 ±0.0096 Δ today 0.0001
168
GraphSC
0.6049 ±0.0041
This paper
167
JOAOv2
0.6049 ±0.0074
This paper
170
EdgePred
0.6040 ±0.0070
This paper
180
DGI
actual #180 vs paper #206 26 places worse
0.6009 ±0.0582
best reported
actual #180 vs paper #206 26 places worse
paper 0.5840 ±0.0080

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.5840 ±0.0080 Δ today 0.0169
222
No Pre-train
0.5730 ±0.0160
This paper
#ModelROC-AUC ↑Paper
1
GeomGCL
0.7630
2
LiGhT DeepGPT
0.7570 ±0.0110
3
CoMPT
0.7550
14
GCN
0.7350 ±0.0020
28
ContextPred
actual #28 vs paper #131 103 places worse
0.7140 ±0.0180
best reported
actual #28 vs paper #131 103 places worse
paper 0.6390 ±0.0060
paper 0.6390 ±0.0060 Δ at pub 0.0750
30
EdgePred
actual #30 vs paper #127 97 places worse
0.7120 ±0.0110
best reported
actual #30 vs paper #127 97 places worse
paper 0.6410 ±0.0060
paper 0.6410 ±0.0060 Δ at pub 0.0710
31
JOAO
actual #31 vs paper #165 134 places worse
0.7110 ±0.0140
best reported
actual #31 vs paper #165 134 places worse
paper 0.6294 ±0.0048
paper 0.6294 ±0.0048 Δ at pub 0.0816
42
GraphCL
actual #42 vs paper #178 136 places worse
0.6960 ±0.0230
best reported
actual #42 vs paper #178 136 places worse
paper 0.6240 ±0.0057
paper 0.6240 ±0.0057 Δ at pub 0.0720
64
GraphLoG
actual #64 vs paper #180 116 places worse
0.6770 ±0.0190
best reported
actual #64 vs paper #180 116 places worse
paper 0.6232 ±0.0051
paper 0.6232 ±0.0051 Δ at pub 0.0538
122
GraphSC
0.6427 ±0.0023
This paper
126
AttrMasking
0.6420 ±0.0050
This paper
138
AD-GCL
actual #138 vs paper #159 21 places worse
0.6350 ±0.0070
best reported
actual #138 vs paper #159 21 places worse
paper 0.6310 ±0.0066

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.6310 ±0.0066 Δ today 0.0040
142
No Pre-train
0.6340 ±0.0060
This paper
145
SimGRACE
0.6336 ±0.0052
This paper
148
RGCL
0.6333 ±0.0017
This paper
158
JOAOv2
0.6316 ±0.0045
This paper
169
DGI
0.6270 ±0.0040
This paper
SOTA performance (not significantly different from the best) Proposed method (this paper) Baseline / comparison (this paper) Global context (other papers) Best at pub — reported result worse than the best known when published (best reported in green) Best at pub — reported value improved over the best known when published Best today — OK at publication; today's leaderboard best is elsewhere