Pre-training with fractional denoising to enhance molecular property prediction

Yuyan Ni, Shikun Feng, Xin Hong, Yuancheng Sun, Weiying Ma, Zhiming Ma, Qiwei Ye, Yanyan Lan

Main figure for Pre-training with fractional denoising to enhance molecular property prediction

Abstract

Deep learning methods have been considered promising for accelerating molecular screening in drug discovery and material design. Due to the limited availability of labelled data, various self-supervised molecular pre-training methods have been presented. Although many existing methods utilize common pre-training tasks in computer vision and natural language processing, they often overlook the fundamental physical principles governing molecules. In contrast, applying denoising in pre-training can be interpreted as an equivalent force learning, but the limited noise distribution introduces bias into the molecular distribution. To address this issue, we introduce a molecular pre-training framework called fractional denoising, which decouples noise design from the constraints imposed by force learning equivalence. In this way, the noise becomes customizable, allowing for incorporating chemical priors to substantially improve the molecular distribution modelling. Experiments demonstrate that our framework consistently outperforms existing methods, establishing state-of-the-art results across force prediction, quantum chemical properties and binding affinity tasks. The refined noise design enhances force accuracy and sampling coverage, which contribute to the creation of physically consistent molecular representations, ultimately leading to superior predictive performance. Denoising methods introduce useful priors in pre-training methods for molecular property prediction, but chemically unaware noise can lead to inaccurate predictions in downstream tasks. A molecular pre-training framework that uses fractional denoising to improve molecular distribution modelling is proposed, resulting in better predictions in various property prediction tasks.

Proposed method: Frad

Benchmark Results

Tested on 1 dataset 1 baseline value reported too low

Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).

Quantum Chemistry

#ModelMAE ↓Paper
1
QHNet
0.0000
2
QHNetV2
0.0000
3
PhiSNet
0.0000
42
Frad
actual #42 vs paper #100 58 places worse
0.0431
best reported
actual #42 vs paper #100 58 places worse
paper 0.2476
58
Coord
actual #58 vs paper #100 42 places worse
0.0529
best reported
actual #58 vs paper #100 42 places worse
paper 0.2497
paper 0.2497 Δ at pub 0.1968
100
pre-training by learning DFT forces
0.2361
This paper
102
training from scratch
0.2530
This paper
SOTA performance (not significantly different from the best) Baseline / comparison (this paper) Global context (other papers) Best at pub — reported result worse than the best known when published (best reported in green)