Scalable Graph Compressed Convolutions

Junshu Sun, Chen Yang, Shuhui Wang, Qingming Huang

Main figure for Scalable Graph Compressed Convolutions

Abstract

Designing effective graph neural networks (GNNs) with message passing has two fundamental challenges, i.e., determining optimal message-passing pathways and designing local aggregators. Previous methods of designing optimal pathways are limited with information loss on the input features. On the other hand, existing local aggregators generally fail to extract multi-scale features and approximate diverse operators under limited parameter scales. In contrast to these methods, Euclidean convolution has been proven as an expressive aggregator, making it a perfect candidate for GNN construction. However, the challenges of generalizing Euclidean convolution to graphs arise from the irregular structure of graphs. To bridge the gap between Euclidean space and graph topology, we propose a differentiable method that applies permutations to calibrate input graphs for Euclidean convolution. The permutations constrain all nodes in a row regardless of their input order and therefore enable the flexible generalization of Euclidean convolution to graphs. Based on the graph calibration, we propose the Compressed Convolution Network (CoCN) for hierarchical graph representation learning. CoCN follows local feature-learning and global parameter-sharing mechanisms of convolution neural networks. The whole model can be trained end-to-end, with compressed convolution applied to learn individual node features and their corresponding structure features. CoCN can further borrow successful practices from Euclidean convolution, including residual connection and inception mechanism. We validate CoCN on both node-level and graph-level benchmarks. CoCN achieves superior performance over competitive GNN baselines. Codes are available at https://github.com/sunjss/CoCN.

Benchmark Results

Tested on 10 datasets 37 baseline values reported too low

Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).

TU Dortmund

#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
MSH-GNN
0.9910 ±0.0030
2
ID-GNN+BEC
0.9830 ±0.0360
3
SupCosine
0.9830 ±0.0250
39
GIN
actual #39 vs paper #586 547 places worse
0.9330 ±0.0290
best reported
actual #39 vs paper #586 547 places worse
paper 0.8139 ±0.0153
paper 0.8139 ±0.0153 Δ at pub 0.1191
55
PATCHY-SAN
actual #55 vs paper #279 224 places worse
0.9260 ±0.0420
best reported
actual #55 vs paper #279 224 places worse
paper 0.8895 ±0.0421
best at pub: Graph Homomorphism Convolution (ICML 2020)

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8895 ±0.0421 Δ at pub 0.0355 Δ today 0.0365
63
GCN
actual #63 vs paper #759 696 places worse
0.9220 ±0.0440
best reported
actual #63 vs paper #759 696 places worse
paper 0.6950 ±0.0178
paper 0.6950 ±0.0178 Δ at pub 0.1960 Δ today 0.2270
101
TopKPool
actual #101 vs paper #766 665 places worse
0.9130 ±0.0070
best reported
actual #101 vs paper #766 665 places worse
paper 0.6761 ±0.0336
paper 0.6761 ±0.0336 Δ at pub 0.2369
158
GraphSAGE
actual #158 vs paper #504 346 places worse
0.9040 ±0.0780
best reported
actual #158 vs paper #504 346 places worse
paper 0.8360 ±0.0960

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8360 ±0.0960 Δ at pub 0.0680
202
GMT
actual #202 vs paper #511 309 places worse
0.8990 ±0.0420
best reported
actual #202 vs paper #511 309 places worse
paper 0.8344 ±0.0133
paper 0.8344 ±0.0133 Δ today 0.0646
208
CoCN
0.8989 ±0.0039
This paper
239
DiffPool
actual #239 vs paper #640 401 places worse
0.8940 ±0.0460
best reported
actual #239 vs paper #640 401 places worse
paper 0.7922 ±0.0102
best at pub: Total Variation Graph Neural Networks (ICML 2022)
paper 0.7922 ±0.0102 Δ at pub 0.0718 Δ today 0.1018
245
SEP
actual #245 vs paper #436 191 places worse
0.8940 ±0.0610
best reported
actual #245 vs paper #436 191 places worse
paper 0.8556 ±0.0109

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8556 ±0.0109 Δ today 0.0384
367
ASAP
actual #367 vs paper #667 300 places worse
0.8740 ±0.0570
best reported
actual #367 vs paper #667 300 places worse
paper 0.7783 ±0.0149
paper 0.7783 ±0.0149 Δ at pub 0.0234 Δ today 0.0957
391
CoCN vanilla
0.8708 ±0.0017
This paper
403
MLP
0.8660 ±0.0495
623
SAGPool
actual #623 vs paper #734 111 places worse
0.7986 ±0.0236
best reported
actual #623 vs paper #734 111 places worse
paper 0.7367 ±0.0428

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7367 ±0.0428 Δ at pub 0.0619
718
SAGE
0.7490 ±0.0870
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
WL-MLP
0.9954
2
GIN
actual #2 vs paper #223 221 places worse
0.9934
best reported
actual #2 vs paper #223 221 places worse
paper 0.8000 ±0.0140
paper 0.8000 ±0.0140 Δ at pub 0.1934
3
GCN
actual #3 vs paper #383 380 places worse
0.9727
best reported
actual #3 vs paper #383 380 places worse
paper 0.7629 ±0.0179
paper 0.7629 ±0.0179 Δ at pub 0.2098
5
DiffPool
actual #5 vs paper #542 537 places worse
0.9210 ±0.0260
best reported
actual #5 vs paper #542 537 places worse
paper 0.6232 ±0.0190
paper 0.6232 ±0.0190 Δ at pub 0.2978
13
CoCN
0.8583 ±0.0086
This paper
80
CoCN vanilla
0.8289 ±0.0019
This paper
87
PG-GNN
0.8280 ±0.0130
This paper
115
PathNN
0.8230 ±0.0190
This paper
131
GraphSAGE
actual #131 vs paper #391 260 places worse
0.8200 ±0.0100
best reported
actual #131 vs paper #391 260 places worse
paper 0.7600 ±0.0180
paper 0.7600 ±0.0180 Δ at pub 0.0600
226
GMT
actual #226 vs paper #381 155 places worse
0.7990 ±0.0040
best reported
actual #226 vs paper #381 155 places worse
paper 0.7635 ±0.0262

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7635 ±0.0262 Δ today 0.0355
254
SEP
actual #254 vs paper #254
0.7935 ±0.0033
actual #254 vs paper #254
paper 0.7935 ±0.0033
prev best: Graph Parsing Networks (ICLR 2024)
paper 0.7935 ±0.0033 Δ at pub 0.0126
259
SAGPool
actual #259 vs paper #509 250 places worse
0.7910 ±0.0300
best reported
actual #259 vs paper #509 250 places worse
paper 0.6745 ±0.0111
paper 0.6745 ±0.0111 Δ at pub 0.1165
288
PATCHY-SAN
0.7860 ±0.0190
This paper
309
ASAP
actual #309 vs paper #465 156 places worse
0.7821 ±0.0175
best reported
actual #309 vs paper #465 156 places worse
paper 0.7148 ±0.0042
paper 0.7148 ±0.0042 Δ at pub 0.0673
355
TopKPool
actual #355 vs paper #510 155 places worse
0.7706 ±0.0090
best reported
actual #355 vs paper #510 155 places worse
paper 0.6702 ±0.0225
paper 0.6702 ±0.0225 Δ at pub 0.1004
534
PathNet
0.6410 ±0.0230
This paper
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
MSH-GNN
0.9410 ±0.0330
2
GRDL
0.8260 ±0.0120
3
GMN
0.8225
7
DiffPool
actual #7 vs paper #132 125 places worse
0.8161 ±0.0232
best reported
actual #7 vs paper #132 125 places worse
paper 0.7625 ±0.0100
24
CoCN
0.7948 ±0.0051
This paper
29
ASAP
actual #29 vs paper #320 291 places worse
0.7892 ±0.0145
best reported
actual #29 vs paper #320 291 places worse
paper 0.7392 ±0.0063
paper 0.7392 ±0.0063 Δ at pub 0.0500
32
GIN
actual #32 vs paper #429 397 places worse
0.7880 ±0.0410
best reported
actual #32 vs paper #429 397 places worse
paper 0.7146 ±0.0166
58
TopKPool
actual #58 vs paper #453 395 places worse
0.7768
best reported
actual #58 vs paper #453 395 places worse
paper 0.7048 ±0.0101
best at pub: Memory-Based Graph Networks (ICLR 2020)
paper 0.7048 ±0.0101 Δ at pub 0.0720
67
SAGE
0.7726 ±0.0228
90
CoCN vanilla
0.7686 ±0.0013
This paper
92
PG-GNN
0.7680 ±0.0380
This paper
115
SEP
0.7642 ±0.0039
This paper
148
GCN
actual #148 vs paper #354 206 places worse
0.7600 ±0.0320
best reported
actual #148 vs paper #354 206 places worse
paper 0.7324 ±0.0073

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7324 ±0.0073 Δ at pub 0.0276 Δ today 0.0276
149
MLP
0.7600 ±0.0320
154
SAGPool
actual #154 vs paper #429 275 places worse
0.7595 ±0.0452
best reported
actual #154 vs paper #429 275 places worse
paper 0.7156 ±0.0149

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7156 ±0.0149 Δ at pub 0.0439
155
GraphSAGE
actual #155 vs paper #363 208 places worse
0.7590 ±0.0320
best reported
actual #155 vs paper #363 208 places worse
paper 0.7300 ±0.0450

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7300 ±0.0450 Δ at pub 0.0290 Δ today 0.0290
225
PathNN
0.7520 ±0.0390
This paper
237
PATCHY-SAN
actual #237 vs paper #245 8 places worse
0.7510 ±0.0330
best reported
actual #237 vs paper #245 8 places worse
paper 0.7500 ±0.0251

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7500 ±0.0251 Δ today 0.0010
236
GMT
actual #236 vs paper #239 3 places worse
0.7510 ±0.0060
best reported
actual #236 vs paper #239 3 places worse
paper 0.7509 ±0.0059

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7509 ±0.0059 Δ today 0.0001
453
PathNet
0.7050 ±0.0390
This paper
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
WL-MLP
0.9792
2
MSH-GNN
0.9640 ±0.0070
3
CoCN
0.8722 ±0.0013
This paper
5
CoCN vanilla
0.8615 ±0.0010
This paper
23
GCN
actual #23 vs paper #101 78 places worse
0.8260 ±0.0220
best reported
actual #23 vs paper #101 78 places worse
paper 0.8059 ±0.0027

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8059 ±0.0027 Δ at pub 0.0201
30
GIN
actual #30 vs paper #174 144 places worse
0.8220 ±0.0210
best reported
actual #30 vs paper #174 144 places worse
paper 0.7819 ±0.0063
paper 0.7819 ±0.0063 Δ at pub 0.0401
33
DiffPool
actual #33 vs paper #33
0.8213 ±0.0043
actual #33 vs paper #33
paper 0.8213 ±0.0043
paper 0.8213 ±0.0043 Δ at pub 0.0286
39
SAGPool
actual #39 vs paper #176 137 places worse
0.8176 ±0.0157
best reported
actual #39 vs paper #176 137 places worse
paper 0.7803 ±0.0031
paper 0.7803 ±0.0031 Δ at pub 0.0373
57
TopKPool
actual #57 vs paper #191 134 places worse
0.8140 ±0.0094
best reported
actual #57 vs paper #191 134 places worse
paper 0.7758 ±0.0085
paper 0.7758 ±0.0085 Δ at pub 0.0382
69
SEP
actual #69 vs paper #69
0.8130 ±0.0020
best reported
actual #69 vs paper #69
paper 0.8128 ±0.0015

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8128 ±0.0015 Δ today 0.0002
88
PG-GNN
0.8090 ±0.0080
This paper
93
GMT
0.8074 ±0.0054
This paper
136
GraphSAGE
actual #136 vs paper #267 131 places worse
0.7970 ±0.0170
best reported
actual #136 vs paper #267 131 places worse
paper 0.7390 ±0.0170
paper 0.7390 ±0.0170 Δ at pub 0.0580 Δ today 0.0580
137
SAGE
0.7970 ±0.0170
151
MLP
0.7920 ±0.0240
166
ASAP
0.7864 ±0.0050
This paper
275
PATCHY-SAN
actual #275 vs paper #279 4 places worse
0.7310 ±0.0270
best reported
actual #275 vs paper #279 4 places worse
paper 0.7260 ±0.0215

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7260 ±0.0215 Δ today 0.0050

Heterophilic Graphs

#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
P^2GNN
0.9541 ±0.0272
2
ACM-GCN
0.9480 ±0.0380
3
RF-GCN
0.9429
15
GGCN
actual #15 vs paper #79 64 places worse
0.9230 ±0.0367
best reported
actual #15 vs paper #79 64 places worse
paper 0.8568 ±0.0663

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8568 ±0.0663 Δ today 0.0662
21
APPNP
actual #21 vs paper #418 397 places worse
0.9181 ±0.0196
best reported
actual #21 vs paper #418 397 places worse
paper 0.5676 ±0.0458
paper 0.5676 ±0.0458 Δ at pub 0.3505
24
MLP
0.9136 ±0.0070
35
GCNII
actual #35 vs paper #203 168 places worse
0.8918 ±0.0396
best reported
actual #35 vs paper #203 168 places worse
paper 0.7786 ±0.0379
paper 0.7786 ±0.0379 Δ at pub 0.0640 Δ today 0.1132
38
FAGCN
actual #38 vs paper #216 178 places worse
0.8852 ±0.0133
best reported
actual #38 vs paper #216 178 places worse
paper 0.7676 ±0.0587
paper 0.7676 ±0.0587 Δ at pub 0.1176
63
ACMII-GCN
actual #63 vs paper #73 10 places worse
0.8649 ±0.0673
best reported
actual #63 vs paper #73 10 places worse
paper 0.8595 ±0.0564

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8595 ±0.0564 Δ at pub 0.0054
71
CoCN vanilla
0.8622 ±0.0049
This paper
85
ChebNet
actual #85 vs paper #244 159 places worse
0.8533 ±0.0104
best reported
actual #85 vs paper #244 159 places worse
paper 0.7430 ±0.0746

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7430 ±0.0746 Δ at pub 0.1103
98
AERO-GNN
actual #98 vs paper #163 65 places worse
0.8480 ±0.0330
best reported
actual #98 vs paper #163 65 places worse
paper 0.8124 ±0.0680

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8124 ±0.0680 Δ at pub 0.0356
123
LINKX
actual #123 vs paper #203 80 places worse
0.8346 ±0.0061
best reported
actual #123 vs paper #203 80 places worse
paper 0.7784 ±0.0581

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7784 ±0.0581 Δ at pub 0.0562
124
CoCN
0.8339 ±0.0165
This paper
138
SAGE
0.8269
157
GraphSAGE
actual #157 vs paper #178 21 places worse
0.8196 ±0.0739
best reported
actual #157 vs paper #178 21 places worse
paper 0.8008 ±0.0296

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8008 ±0.0296 Δ at pub 0.0188
170
GCN
actual #170 vs paper #417 247 places worse
0.8082 ±0.0360
best reported
actual #170 vs paper #417 247 places worse
paper 0.5703 ±0.0467
paper 0.5703 ±0.0467 Δ at pub 0.2312 Δ today 0.2379
183
MixHop
actual #183 vs paper #249 66 places worse
0.7950 ±0.0630
best reported
actual #183 vs paper #249 66 places worse
paper 0.7351 ±0.0634

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7351 ±0.0634 Δ at pub 0.0599
200
GPRGCN
0.7811 ±0.0655
This paper
342
Geom-GCN
actual #342 vs paper #372 30 places worse
0.6412
best reported
actual #342 vs paper #372 30 places worse
paper 0.6054 ±0.0367

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.6054 ±0.0367 Δ at pub 0.0358
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
DiGGR
0.4535 ±0.0353
2
TRIGON
0.4402 ±0.0028
3
DoG
0.4320 ±0.0120
38
GCNII
actual #38 vs paper #114 76 places worse
0.4082 ±0.0179
best reported
actual #38 vs paper #114 76 places worse
paper 0.3744 ±0.0130
paper 0.3744 ±0.0130 Δ at pub 0.0117 Δ today 0.0338
41
APPNP
actual #41 vs paper #351 310 places worse
0.4046 ±0.0064
best reported
actual #41 vs paper #351 310 places worse
paper 0.3002 ±0.0089
paper 0.3002 ±0.0089 Δ at pub 0.1044
42
MLP
0.4026 ±0.0108
56
FAGCN
actual #56 vs paper #240 184 places worse
0.3970
best reported
actual #56 vs paper #240 184 places worse
paper 0.3482 ±0.0135
paper 0.3482 ±0.0135 Δ at pub 0.0488
62
GGCN
actual #62 vs paper #113 51 places worse
0.3929 ±0.0048
best reported
actual #62 vs paper #113 51 places worse
paper 0.3754 ±0.0156

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.3754 ±0.0156 Δ at pub 0.0027 Δ today 0.0175
68
GraphSAGE
actual #68 vs paper #234 166 places worse
0.3899 ±0.0085
best reported
actual #68 vs paper #234 166 places worse
paper 0.3507 ±0.0015
paper 0.3507 ±0.0015 Δ at pub 0.0392
87
Geom-GCN
actual #87 vs paper #308 221 places worse
0.3810
best reported
actual #87 vs paper #308 221 places worse
paper 0.3159 ±0.0115
paper 0.3159 ±0.0115 Δ at pub 0.0651
88
ChebNet
actual #88 vs paper #264 176 places worse
0.3802 ±0.0023
best reported
actual #88 vs paper #264 176 places worse
paper 0.3411 ±0.0109
paper 0.3411 ±0.0109 Δ at pub 0.0391
131
ACMII-GCN
actual #131 vs paper #163 32 places worse
0.3709 ±0.0132
best reported
actual #131 vs paper #163 32 places worse
paper 0.3643 ±0.0120

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.3643 ±0.0120 Δ at pub 0.0066 Δ today 0.0066
135
GCN
actual #135 vs paper #342 207 places worse
0.3690
best reported
actual #135 vs paper #342 207 places worse
paper 0.3026 ±0.0079
paper 0.3026 ±0.0079 Δ at pub 0.0664
155
CoCN
0.3662 ±0.0085
This paper
157
AERO-GNN
0.3657 ±0.0110
This paper
162
MixHop
actual #162 vs paper #297 135 places worse
0.3648 ±0.0120
best reported
actual #162 vs paper #297 135 places worse
paper 0.3222 ±0.0234
paper 0.3222 ±0.0234 Δ at pub 0.0426
170
CoCN vanilla
0.3635 ±0.0012
This paper
180
LINKX
0.3610 ±0.0155
This paper
225
GPRGCN
0.3516 ±0.0090
This paper
266
GIN
0.3410 ±0.0030
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
Hetero-S (GAT 8-layer)
0.8693
2
Dir-GNN+CNA
0.8586 ±0.0180
3
GAT
0.8560
17
CoCN
0.7935 ±0.0142
This paper
18
CoCN exp.
0.7935
This paper
19
CoCN vanilla
0.7917 ±0.0017
This paper
40
AERO-GNN
actual #40 vs paper #40
0.7158 ±0.0240
actual #40 vs paper #40
paper 0.7158 ±0.0240
48
GGCN
0.7114 ±0.0184
This paper
52
GCN
actual #52 vs paper #138 86 places worse
0.7033
best reported
actual #52 vs paper #138 86 places worse
paper 0.5982 ±0.0258
paper 0.5982 ±0.0258 Δ at pub 0.1051
63
ACMII-GCN
0.6846 ±0.0170
This paper
64
LINKX
0.6842 ±0.0138
This paper
79
APPNP
actual #79 vs paper #252 173 places worse
0.6670 ±0.0270
best reported
actual #79 vs paper #252 173 places worse
paper 0.4044 ±0.0202
paper 0.4044 ±0.0202 Δ at pub 0.2626
103
GCNII
0.6386 ±0.0304
This paper
108
SAGE
0.6340 ±0.0300
113
GPRGCN
0.6259 ±0.0204
This paper
124
Geom-GCN
actual #124 vs paper #137 13 places worse
0.6090
best reported
actual #124 vs paper #137 13 places worse
paper 0.6000 ±0.0281

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.6000 ±0.0281 Δ at pub 0.0090 Δ today 0.0090
129
MixHop
0.6050 ±0.0253
This paper
140
ChebNet
actual #140 vs paper #163 23 places worse
0.5928 ±0.0125
best reported
actual #140 vs paper #163 23 places worse
paper 0.5524 ±0.0276

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.5524 ±0.0276 Δ at pub 0.0404
169
MLP
0.5429
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
IBG-NN
0.7763 ±0.0179
2
Dir-GNN+CNA
0.7747 ±0.0128
3
DHGNN
0.7684 ±0.0161
13
CoCN
0.7298 ±0.0178
This paper
14
CoCN vanilla
0.7295 ±0.0023
This paper
26
ACMII-GCN
actual #26 vs paper #84 58 places worse
0.6740 ±0.0221
best reported
actual #26 vs paper #84 58 places worse
paper 0.5180 ±0.0150
40
LINKX
0.6181 ±0.0180
This paper
41
AERO-GNN
actual #41 vs paper #41
0.6176 ±0.0240
actual #41 vs paper #41
paper 0.6176 ±0.0240
46
GCN
0.6067
68
APPNP
actual #68 vs paper #242 174 places worse
0.5590 ±0.0290
best reported
actual #68 vs paper #242 174 places worse
paper 0.2920 ±0.0145
paper 0.2920 ±0.0145 Δ at pub 0.2670
69
GGCN
actual #69 vs paper #71 2 places worse
0.5567 ±0.0187
best reported
actual #69 vs paper #71 2 places worse
paper 0.5517 ±0.0158

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.5517 ±0.0158 Δ today 0.0050
107
GPRGCN
0.4631 ±0.0246
This paper
125
ChebNet
actual #125 vs paper #125
0.4386 ±0.0164
actual #125 vs paper #125
paper 0.4386 ±0.0164
paper 0.4386 ±0.0164 Δ at pub 0.0305
127
MixHop
0.4380 ±0.0148
This paper
128
GraphSAGE
actual #128 vs paper #199 71 places worse
0.4378 ±0.0190
best reported
actual #128 vs paper #199 71 places worse
paper 0.3673 ±0.0121
172
MLP
0.3930 ±0.0079
176
GCNII
actual #176 vs paper #178 2 places worse
0.3881 ±0.0197
best reported
actual #176 vs paper #178 2 places worse
paper 0.3847 ±0.0158

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.3847 ±0.0158 Δ today 0.0034
179
Geom-GCN
actual #179 vs paper #181 2 places worse
0.3832 ±0.0092
best reported
actual #179 vs paper #181 2 places worse
paper 0.3815 ±0.0092

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.3815 ±0.0092 Δ at pub 0.0017 Δ today 0.0017

LRGB

#ModelMRR ↑Paper
1
FloydNet
0.6143
2
Exphormer
0.4737 ±0.0024
3
Exphormer + LapPE
0.4737 ±0.0024
8
GatedGCN
actual #8 vs paper #77 69 places worse
0.4670 ±0.0004
best reported
actual #8 vs paper #77 69 places worse
paper 0.3218 ±0.0011
paper 0.3218 ±0.0011 Δ at pub 0.1452 Δ today 0.1452
15
GINE
actual #15 vs paper #78 63 places worse
0.4617 ±0.0005
best reported
actual #15 vs paper #78 63 places worse
paper 0.3180 ±0.0027
paper 0.3180 ±0.0027 Δ today 0.1437
16
GIN
0.4617 ±0.0005
28
GCN
actual #28 vs paper #76 48 places worse
0.4526 ±0.0006
best reported
actual #28 vs paper #76 48 places worse
paper 0.3234 ±0.0006
paper 0.3234 ±0.0006 Δ at pub 0.1292 Δ today 0.1292
36
CoCN exp.
0.3713 ±0.0037
This paper
44
Cache-GNN+RWSE
0.3488 ±0.0008
This paper
48
DRew-GCN
0.3444 ±0.0017
This paper
56
Graph Diffuser
0.3388 ±0.0011
This paper
82
GCNII
0.3161 ±0.0004
This paper

Heterophily Benchmark

#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
UniGAP
0.6375 ±0.0110
2
H2GCN + HalfHop
0.5961 ±0.0100
3
GraphSAGE + HalfHop
0.5897 ±0.0150
7
H2GCN
actual #7 vs paper #196 189 places worse
0.5681 ±0.0090
best reported
actual #7 vs paper #196 189 places worse
paper 0.3647 ±0.0023
12
SAGE
0.5569 ±0.0023
14
GAT
actual #14 vs paper #105 91 places worse
0.5559 ±0.0027
best reported
actual #14 vs paper #105 91 places worse
paper 0.4909 ±0.0063
24
GCN
actual #24 vs paper #111 87 places worse
0.5411 ±0.0034
best reported
actual #24 vs paper #111 87 places worse
paper 0.4870 ±0.0063
80
Sp. CoCN
0.5074 ±0.0015
This paper
82
SGC
0.5066 ±0.0048
This paper
84
MLP
0.5058
137
FAGCN
actual #137 vs paper #156 19 places worse
0.4632 ±0.0250
best reported
actual #137 vs paper #156 19 places worse
paper 0.4412 ±0.0030

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.4412 ±0.0030 Δ at pub 0.0220 Δ today 0.0220
150
GPRGCN
0.4488 ±0.0034
This paper
164
Seg. CoCN
0.4306 ±0.0021
This paper
196
GloGNN
actual #196 vs paper #196
0.3728 ±0.0066
best reported
actual #196 vs paper #196
paper 0.3689 ±0.0014

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.3689 ±0.0014 Δ at pub 0.0039 Δ today 0.0039
SOTA performance (not significantly different from the best) Proposed method (this paper) Baseline / comparison (this paper) Global context (other papers) Best at pub — reported result worse than the best known when published (best reported in green) Best at pub — reported value improved over the best known when published Best today — OK at publication; today's leaderboard best is elsewhere