Non-convolutional Graph Neural Networks
Abstract
Rethink convolution-based graph neural networks (GNN)---they characteristically suffer from limited expressiveness, over-smoothing, and over-squashing, and require specialized sparse kernels for efficient computation. Here, we design a simple graph learning module entirely free of convolution operators, coined random walk with unifying memory (RUM) neural network, where an RNN merges the topological and semantic graph features along the random walks terminating at each node. Relating the rich literature on RNN behavior and graph topology, we theoretically show and experimentally verify that RUM attenuates the aforementioned symptoms and is more expressive than the Weisfeiler-Lehman (WL) isomorphism test. On a variety of node- and graph-level classification and regression tasks, RUM not only achieves competitive performance, but is also robust, memory-efficient, scalable, and faster than the simplest convolutional GNNs.
Benchmark Results
Tested on 4 datasets 5 baseline values reported too low
Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).
Classic
| # | Model | Accuracy ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GraphTARIF | 0.9703
±0.0019 | |
| 2 | GAT | 0.9669
±0.0014 best reported | best at pub: SignGT: Signed Attention-based Graph Transformer for Graph Representation Learning (2023) best today: Graph Transductive Sharpening: Leveraging Unlabeled Predictions in Node Classification (2026) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 3 | GAT+T | 0.9660
±0.0007 | |
| 7 | SAGE | 0.9643
±0.0027 | |
| 8 | GCN | 0.9632
±0.0008 best reported | |
| 56 | GraphSAGE | 0.9508
±0.0026 best reported | best at pub: A Quasi-Wasserstein Loss for Learning Graph Neural Networks (WWW 2023) |
| 255 | RUM | 0.9270
±0.0010 | This paper |
| 390 | MLP | 0.9128
±0.0063 | |
| 393 | MoNet | 0.9124
±0.0130 best reported | best at pub: Building Shortcuts between Distant Nodes with Biaffine Mapping for Graph Convolutional Networks (2023) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| # | Model | Accuracy ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GraphTARIF | 0.9461
±0.0017 | |
| 2 | GCN | 0.9412
±0.0008 best reported | best at pub: Clarify Confused Nodes via Separated Learning (2023) |
| 3 | GAT | 0.9398
±0.0022 best reported | best at pub: SignGT: Signed Attention-based Graph Transformer for Graph Representation Learning (2023) best today: Graph Transductive Sharpening: Leveraging Unlabeled Predictions in Node Classification (2026) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 8 | SAGE | 0.9351
±0.0006 | |
| 320 | MLP | 0.8463 | |
| 367 | MoNet | 0.8350
±0.0220 | This paper |
| 443 | RUM | 0.7780
±0.0230 | This paper |
TU Dortmund
| # | Model | Accuracy ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MSH-GNN | 0.9910
±0.0030 | |
| 2 | ID-GNN+BEC | 0.9830
±0.0360 | |
| 3 | SupCosine | 0.9830
±0.0250 | |
| 35 | AgentNet | 0.9360
±0.0860 | This paper |
| 39 | GIN | 0.9330
±0.0290 best reported | best at pub: ProtGNN: Towards Self-Explaining Graph Neural Networks (AAAI 2021) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 64 | GSN | 0.9220
±0.0750 | This paper |
| 63 | GCN | 0.9220
±0.0440 | |
| 115 | RUM | 0.9100
±0.0710 | This paper |
| 161 | WLK | 0.9040
±0.0570 | This paper |
| 162 | CRaWl | 0.9040
±0.0710 | This paper |
| 341 | AWE | 0.8787
±0.0976 best reported | best at pub: Anonymous Walk Embeddings (ICML 2018) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 403 | MLP | 0.8660
±0.0495 | |
| 506 | GK | 0.8350
±0.0060 best reported | best at pub: Supervised Contrastive Learning with Structure Inference for Graph Classification (2022) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 643 | RWK | 0.7920
±0.0210 | This paper |
| # | Model | Accuracy ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WL-MLP | 0.9954 | |
| 2 | GIN | 0.9934 best reported | best at pub: 1-WL Expressiveness Is (Almost) All You Need (2022) |
| 3 | GCN | 0.9727 | |
| 11 | WLK | 0.8600
±0.0180 | This paper |
| 50 | GSN | 0.8350
±0.0200 | This paper |
| 131 | GraphSAGE | 0.8200
±0.0100 | |
| 147 | RUM | 0.8170
±0.0140 | This paper |
| 519 | GK | 0.6600
±0.0010 best reported | best at pub: InfoGCL: Information-Aware Graph Contrastive Learning (NeurIPS 2021) |
