Relaxed Equivariance via Multitask Learning

Ahmed A. A. Elhag, T. Konstantin Rusch, Francesco Di Giovanni, Michael M. Bronstein

Main figure for Relaxed Equivariance via Multitask Learning

Abstract

Incorporating equivariance as an inductive bias into deep learning architectures to take advantage of the data symmetry has been successful in multiple applications, such as chemistry and dynamical systems. In particular, roto-translations are crucial for effectively modeling geometric graphs and molecules, where understanding the 3D structures enhances generalization. However, strictly equivariant models often pose challenges due to their higher computational complexity. In this paper, we introduce REMUL, a training procedure that learns approximate equivariance for unconstrained networks via multitask learning. By formulating equivariance as a tunable objective alongside the primary task loss, REMUL offers a principled way to control the degree of approximate symmetry, relaxing the rigid constraints of traditional equivariant architectures. We show that unconstrained models (which do not build equivariance into the architecture) can learn approximate symmetries by minimizing an additional simple equivariance loss. This enables quantitative control over the trade-off between enforcing equivariance constraints and optimizing for task-specific performance. Our method achieves competitive performance compared to equivariant baselines while being significantly faster (up to 10$ $ at inference and 2.5$ $ at training), offering a practical and adaptable approach to leveraging symmetry in unconstrained architectures.

Proposed method: REMUL-GNN

Benchmark Results

Tested on 1 dataset

Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).

Quantum Chemistry

#ModelMAE ↓Paper
1
QHNet
0.0000
2
QHNetV2
0.0000
3
PhiSNet
0.0000
11
EGNO
0.0037 ±0.0001
This paper
12
HEGNN
0.0037 ±0.0002
This paper
13
GMN
0.0040 ±0.0001
This paper
15
EGNN
0.0047 ±0.0002
This paper
18
REMUL-GNN
0.0054 ±0.0000
This paper
17
GNN
0.0054 ±0.0000
This paper
20
DA-GNN
0.0069 ±0.0000
This paper
SOTA performance (not significantly different from the best) Proposed method (this paper) Baseline / comparison (this paper) Global context (other papers)