TMLR 2024

Expressivity of Representation Learning on Continuous-Time Dynamic Graphs: An Information-Flow Centric Review

Sofiane Ennadir, Gabriela Zarzar Gandler, Filip Cornell, Lele Cao, Oleg Smirnov, Tianze Wang, Levente Z'olyomi, Bjorn Brinne, Sahar Asadi

Main figure for Expressivity of Representation Learning on Continuous-Time Dynamic Graphs: An Information-Flow Centric Review

Abstract

Graphs are ubiquitous in real-world applications, ranging from social networks to biological systems, and have inspired the development of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) for learning expressive representations. While most research has centered on static graphs, many real-world scenarios involve dynamic, temporally evolving graphs, motivating the need for Continuous-Time Dynamic Graph (CTDG) models. This paper provides a comprehensive review of Graph Representation Learning (GRL) on CTDGs with a focus on Self-Supervised Representation Learning (SSRL). We introduce a novel theoretical framework that analyzes the expressivity of CTDG models through an Information-Flow (IF) lens, quantifying their ability to propagate and encode temporal and structural information. Leveraging this framework, we categorize existing CTDG methods based on their suitability for different graph types and application scenarios. Within the same scope, we examine the design of SSRL methods tailored to CTDGs, such as predictive and contrastive approaches, highlighting their potential to mitigate the reliance on labeled data. Empirical evaluations on synthetic and real-world datasets validate our theoretical insights, demonstrating the strengths and limitations of various methods across long-range, bi-partite and community-based graphs. This work offers both a theoretical foundation and practical guidance for selecting and developing CTDG models, advancing the understanding of GRL in dynamic settings.

Proposed method: Information-Flow (IF) framework

Benchmark Results

Tested on 1 dataset

Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).

OGB

#ModelMRR ↑Paper
1
InterHT + DigPiece
0.7293 ±0.0018
2
StarGraph + TripleRE'
0.7290
3
TripleRE + StarGraph
0.7201 ±0.0011
13
Information-Flow (IF) framework
0.6110 ±0.0110
This paper
22
TGN
0.5770 ±0.0150
This paper
42
TGAT
0.2820 ±0.0220
This paper
43
DyRep
0.2630 ±0.0050
This paper
44
JODIE
0.2610 ±0.1230
This paper
SOTA performance (not significantly different from the best) Proposed method (this paper) Baseline / comparison (this paper) Global context (other papers)