Molecular fingerprints are strong models for peptide function prediction
Abstract
Abstract Motivation Understanding peptide properties is often assumed to require modeling long-range molecular interactions, motivating complex graph neural networks and pretrained transformers. Whether such long-range dependencies are essential remains unclear. We investigate if simple, domain-specific molecular fingerprints can capture peptide function without these assumptions. Atomic-level representations aim to provide richer information than purely sequence-based models and better efficiency than structural ones. Results Across 132 datasets, including LRGB and five additional peptide benchmarks, models using count-based ECFP, Topological Torsion, and RDKit fingerprints with LightGBM achieve state-of-the-art accuracy. Despite encoding only short-range molecular features, these models outperform GNNs and transformer-based approaches. Control experiments confirm that fingerprints, though inherently local, suffice for robust peptide property prediction. Our results challenge the presumed necessity of long-range interaction modeling and highlight molecular fingerprints as efficient, interpretable, and lightweight alternatives. Supplementary information All code and data are available on GitHub and Zenodo: https://github.com/scikit-fingerprints/peptides_molecular_fingerprints_classification https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19388783
Benchmark Results
Tested on 2 datasets Non-standard metric on 1 dataset
Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).
LRGB
| # | Model | MAE ↓ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GCN | 0.2421
±0.0016 best reported | best at pub: Where Did the Gap Go? Reassessing the Long-Range Graph Benchmark (TMLR 2023) best today: From Message-Passing to Linearized Graph Sequence Models (2026) |
| 2 | IPR-MPNN | 0.2422
±0.0007 | |
| 3 | TANGO-GPS | 0.2422
±0.0014 | |
| 5 | GIN | 0.2429
±0.0019 | |
| 7 | GatedGCN | 0.2431
±0.0020 best reported | best at pub: Where Did the Gap Go? Reassessing the Long-Range Graph Benchmark (TMLR 2023) best today: From Message-Passing to Linearized Graph Sequence Models (2026) |
| 10 | count-based molecular fingerprints | 0.2432 | This paper |
| 13 | TT | 0.2438 | This paper |
| 15 | S^2GCN | 0.2447
±0.0032 | This paper |
| 19 | Graph ViT | 0.2449
±0.0016 | This paper |
| 27 | GRED | 0.2455
±0.0013 | prev best: Recurrent Distance Filtering for Graph Representation Learning (ICML 2023) |
| 28 | HDSE | 0.2457
±0.0013 | This paper |
| 31 | RDKit | 0.2459 | This paper |
| 32 | GRIT | 0.2460
±0.0012 | This paper |
| 49 | GINE | 0.2473
±0.0017 | This paper |
| 87 | GraphGPS | 0.2500
±0.0005 | This paper |
| 93 | CRaWl | 0.2506
±0.0022 | This paper |
| 114 | Transformer | 0.2529
±0.0016 | This paper |
| 115 | DRew | 0.2536
±0.0015 | This paper |
| 124 | SAN | 0.2545
±0.0012 | This paper |
| 201 | MLP | 0.4351
±0.0008 |
Peptides-func
Global leaderboard →Sorted by AUPRC. Highlighted rows are from other papers.
| # | Model | AUPRC ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | count-based molecular fingerprints | 0.7460 | This paper |
| 2 | TT | 0.7318 | This paper |
| 3 | S^2GCN | 0.7311
±0.0066 | This paper |
| 4 | RDKit | 0.7311 | This paper |
| 5 | HDSE | 0.7156
±0.0058 | This paper |
| 6 | DRew | 0.7150
±0.0044 | This paper |
| 7 | GRED | 0.7133
±0.0011 | This paper |
| 8 | CRaWl | 0.7074
±0.0032 | This paper |
| 9 | GRIT | 0.6988
±0.0082 | This paper |
| 10 | Graph ViT | 0.6942
±0.0075 | This paper |
| 11 | GCN | 0.6860
±0.0050 | This paper |
| 12 | GatedGCN | 0.6765
±0.0047 | This paper |
| 13 | GINE | 0.6621
±0.0067 | This paper |
| 14 | GraphGPS | 0.6535
±0.0041 | This paper |
| 15 | MOLTOP | 0.6459
±0.0005 | This paper |
| 16 | SAN | 0.6439
±0.0075 | This paper |
| 17 | Transformer | 0.6326
±0.0126 | This paper |
