ICLR 2025

Equivariant Masked position prediction for efficient molecular representation

Junyi An, Chao Qu, Yunfei Shi, Xinhao Liu, Qianwei Tang, Fenglei Cao, Yuan Qi

Main figure for Equivariant Masked position prediction for efficient molecular representation

Abstract

Graph neural networks (GNNs) have shown considerable promise in computational chemistry. However, the limited availability of molecular data raises concerns regarding GNNs' ability to effectively capture the fundamental principles of physics and chemistry, which constrains their generalization capabilities. To address this challenge, we introduce a novel self-supervised approach termed Equivariant Masked Position Prediction (EMPP), grounded in intramolecular potential and force theory. Unlike conventional attribute masking techniques, EMPP formulates a nuanced position prediction task that is more well-defined and enhances the learning of quantum mechanical features. EMPP also bypasses the approximation of the Gaussian mixture distribution commonly used in denoising methods, allowing for more accurate acquisition of physical properties. Experimental results indicate that EMPP significantly enhances performance of advanced molecular architectures, surpassing state-of-the-art self-supervised approaches.

Benchmark Results

Tested on 1 dataset 4 baseline values reported too low

Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).

Quantum Chemistry

#ModelMAE ↓Paper
1
QHNet
0.0000
2
QHNetV2
0.0000
3
PhiSNet
0.0000
22
PaiNN
actual #22 vs paper #119 97 places worse
0.0100
best reported
actual #22 vs paper #119 97 places worse
paper 2.7000
26
Equiformer
actual #26 vs paper #116 90 places worse
0.0200
best reported
actual #26 vs paper #116 90 places worse
paper 2.0000
35
TorchMD-Net
actual #35 vs paper #118 83 places worse
0.0390
best reported
actual #35 vs paper #118 83 places worse
paper 2.3000
46
SchNet
actual #46 vs paper #119 73 places worse
0.0500
best reported
actual #46 vs paper #119 73 places worse
paper 3.5000
64
DimeNet++
actual #64 vs paper #119 55 places worse
0.0640
best reported
actual #64 vs paper #119 55 places worse
paper 2.8000
paper 2.8000 Δ at pub 2.7360 Δ today 2.7360
115
EMPP (energy only)
1.5000
This paper
SOTA performance (not significantly different from the best) Proposed method (this paper) Global context (other papers) Best at pub — reported result worse than the best known when published (best reported in green) Best today — OK at publication; today's leaderboard best is elsewhere