KDD 2025

Scalable Graph Condensation with Evolving Capabilities

Shengbo Gong, Mohammad Hashemi, Juntong Ni, Carl Yang, Wei Jin

Main figure for Scalable Graph Condensation with Evolving Capabilities

Abstract

The rapid growth of graph data creates significant scalability challenges as most graph algorithms scale quadratically with size. To mitigate these issues, Graph Condensation (GC) methods have been proposed to learn a small graph from a larger one, accelerating downstream tasks. However, existing approaches critically assume a static training set, which conflicts with the inherently dynamic and evolving nature of real-world graph data. This work introduces a novel framework for continual graph condensation, enabling efficient updates to the distilled graph that handle data streams without requiring costly retraining. This limitation leads to inefficiencies when condensing growing training sets. In this paper, we introduce GECC (raph volving lustering ondensation), a scalable graph condensation method designed to handle large-scale and evolving graph data. GECC employs a traceable and efficient approach by performing class-wise clustering on aggregated features. Furthermore, it can inherit previous condensation results as clustering centroids when the condensed graph expands, thereby attaining an evolving capability. This methodology is supported by robust theoretical foundations and demonstrates superior empirical performance. Comprehensive experiments including real world scenario show that GECC achieves better performance than most state-of-the-art graph condensation methods while delivering an around 1000$ $ speedup on large datasets.

Proposed method: GECC

Benchmark Results

Tested on 1 dataset 3 baseline values reported too low

Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).

Classic

#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
CNA
0.9575 ±0.0058
2
IS-GIB
0.9390 ±0.0187
3
EERM
0.9112 ±0.0145
44
GCN
0.8033 ±0.0088
244
SimGC
actual #244 vs paper #735 491 places worse
0.7380 ±0.0250
best reported
actual #244 vs paper #735 491 places worse
paper 0.6640
best at pub: Simple Graph Condensation (2024)
paper 0.6640 Δ at pub 0.0740
299
GECC
0.7325
This paper
326
GEOM
0.7303
This paper
350
MLP
0.7289 ±0.0010
593
Random
actual #593 vs paper #810 217 places worse
0.7049 ±0.0008
best reported
actual #593 vs paper #810 217 places worse
paper 0.6262
paper 0.6262 Δ at pub 0.0787
632
GCDM
actual #632 vs paper #642 10 places worse
0.6980 ±0.0020
best reported
actual #632 vs paper #642 10 places worse
paper 0.6935 ±0.0082
best at pub: Simple Graph Condensation (2024)

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.6935 ±0.0082 Δ at pub 0.0045
651
Herding
actual #651 vs paper #730 79 places worse
0.6900 ±0.0010
best reported
actual #651 vs paper #730 79 places worse
paper 0.6666
best at pub: Simple Graph Condensation (2024)
paper 0.6666 Δ at pub 0.0234
675
GCondX
0.6838
This paper
835
KCenter
0.5904
This paper
SOTA performance (not significantly different from the best) Proposed method (this paper) Baseline / comparison (this paper) Global context (other papers) Best at pub — reported result worse than the best known when published (best reported in green)