InfoGain Wavelets: Furthering the Design of Graph Diffusion Wavelets
Abstract
Diffusion wavelets extract information from graph signals at different scales of resolution by utilizing graph diffusion operators raised to various powers, known as diffusion scales. Traditionally, these scales are chosen to be dyadic integers, $2^j$. Here, we propose a novel, unsupervised method for selecting the diffusion scales based on ideas from information theory. We then show that our method can be incorporated into wavelet-based GNNs, which are modeled after the geometric scattering transform, via graph classification experiments.
Benchmark Results
Tested on 3 datasets
Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).
TU Dortmund
| # | Model | Accuracy ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MSH-GNN | 0.9910
±0.0030 | |
| 2 | ID-GNN+BEC | 0.9830
±0.0360 | |
| 3 | SupCosine | 0.9830
±0.0250 | |
| 39 | GIN | 0.9330
±0.0290 | |
| 403 | MLP | 0.8660
±0.0495 | |
| 430 | LS-InfoGain | 0.8567
±0.1004 | This paper |
| 431 | LS-InfoGain Wavelets-16-drop | 0.8567
±0.1004 | This paper |
| 465 | LEGS-16-original-ATTN-FCN | 0.8460
±0.0613 | This paper |
| 556 | LEGS-16-subset | 0.8240
±0.0912 | This paper |
| 568 | LEGS | 0.8193
±0.0999 | This paper |
| 569 | LEGS-16-full | 0.8193
±0.0999 | This paper |
| 608 | LS-dyadic | 0.8035
±0.0959 | This paper |
| 610 | LS-dyadic-16-full | 0.8035
±0.0959 | This paper |
| 676 | LS-dyadic-subset | 0.7728
±0.1850 | This paper |
| # | Model | Accuracy ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WL-MLP | 0.9954 | |
| 2 | GIN | 0.9934 | |
| 3 | GCN | 0.9727 | |
| 131 | GraphSAGE | 0.8200
±0.0100 | |
| 340 | LS-InfoGain | 0.7747
±0.0242 | This paper |
| 341 | LS-InfoGain Wavelets-16-drop | 0.7747
±0.0242 | This paper |
| 376 | LS-dyadic | 0.7642
±0.0279 | This paper |
| 377 | LS-dyadic-16-full | 0.7642
±0.0279 | This paper |
| 432 | LEGS-16-original-RBF | 0.7426
±0.0153 | This paper |
| 486 | LEGS | 0.6973
±0.0194 | This paper |
| 487 | LEGS-16-full | 0.6973
±0.0194 | This paper |
| # | Model | Accuracy ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MSH-GNN | 0.9410
±0.0330 | |
| 2 | GRDL | 0.8260
±0.0120 | |
| 3 | GMN | 0.8225 | |
| 32 | GIN | 0.7880
±0.0410 | |
| 149 | MLP | 0.7600
±0.0320 | |
| 171 | LS-dyadic | 0.7575
±0.0350 | This paper |
| 173 | LS-dyadic-16-full | 0.7575
±0.0350 | This paper |
| 270 | LS-InfoGain | 0.7485
±0.0389 | This paper |
| 271 | LS-InfoGain-16-drop | 0.7485
±0.0389 | This paper |
| 295 | LEGS | 0.7440
±0.0419 | This paper |
| 296 | LEGS-16-full | 0.7440
±0.0419 | This paper |
| 441 | LEGS-16-original-FCN | 0.7106
±0.0317 | This paper |
SOTA performance (not significantly different from the best)
Proposed method (this paper)
Baseline / comparison (this paper)
Global context (other papers)
