ICML 2025

Geometric Hyena Networks for Large-scale Equivariant Learning

Artem Moskalev, M. Prakash, Junjie Xu, Tianyu Cui, Rui Liao, Tommaso Mansi

Main figure for Geometric Hyena Networks for Large-scale Equivariant Learning

Abstract

Processing global geometric context while preserving equivariance is crucial when modeling biological, chemical, and physical systems. Yet, this is challenging due to the computational demands of equivariance and global context at scale. Standard methods such as equivariant self-attention suffer from quadratic complexity, while local methods such as distance-based message passing sacrifice global information. Inspired by the recent success of state-space and long-convolutional models, we introduce Geometric Hyena, the first equivariant long-convolutional model for geometric systems. Geometric Hyena captures global geometric context at sub-quadratic complexity while maintaining equivariance to rotations and translations. Evaluated on all-atom property prediction of large RNA molecules and full protein molecular dynamics, Geometric Hyena outperforms existing equivariant models while requiring significantly less memory and compute that equivariant self-attention. Notably, our model processes the geometric context of 30k tokens 20x faster than the equivariant transformer and allows 72x longer context within the same budget.

Benchmark Results

Tested on 1 dataset

Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).

DualEquiNet RNA Benchmarks

#ModelRMSE ↓Paper
1
G-Heyna
0.5480 ±0.0080
This paper
2
Equiformer
0.5500 ±0.0090
This paper
3
G-Transformer
0.5540 ±0.0030
This paper
4
Transformer
0.5560 ±0.0010
This paper
5
Hyena
0.5600 ±0.0020
This paper
7
SchNet
0.6910 ±0.0180
This paper
8
TFN
actual #8 vs paper #9 1 place worse
0.6940 ±0.0080
best reported
actual #8 vs paper #9 1 place worse
paper 0.7100 ±0.0090
best today: DualEquiNet RNA Benchmarks (2025)

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7100 ±0.0090 Δ today 0.0160
9
FastEGNN
0.7040 ±0.0050
This paper
11
EGNN
actual #11 vs paper #11
0.7200 ±0.0220
best reported
actual #11 vs paper #11
paper 0.7280 ±0.0010
best today: DualEquiNet RNA Benchmarks (2025)

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7280 ±0.0010 Δ today 0.0080
14
LEFTNet
0.7490 ±0.0060
This paper
15
TMD-ET
0.7500 ±0.0040
This paper
SOTA performance (not significantly different from the best) Proposed method (this paper) Baseline / comparison (this paper)