Dynamic Graph Condensation
Abstract
Recent research on deep graph learning has shifted from static to dynamic graphs, motivated by the evolving behaviors observed in complex real-world systems. However, the temporal extension in dynamic graphs poses significant data efficiency challenges, including increased data volume, high spatiotemporal redundancy, and reliance on costly dynamic graph neural networks (DGNNs). To alleviate the concerns, we pioneer the study of dynamic graph condensation (DGC), which aims to substantially reduce the scale of dynamic graphs for data-efficient DGNN training. Accordingly, we propose DyGC, a novel framework that condenses the real dynamic graph into a compact version while faithfully preserving the inherent spatiotemporal characteristics. Specifically, to endow synthetic graphs with realistic evolving structures, a novel spiking structure generation mechanism is introduced. It draws on the dynamic behavior of spiking neurons to model temporally-aware connectivity in dynamic graphs. Given the tightly coupled spatiotemporal dependencies, DyGC proposes a tailored distribution matching approach that first constructs a semantically rich state evolving field for dynamic graphs, and then performs fine-grained spatiotemporal state alignment to guide the optimization of the condensed graph. Experiments across multiple dynamic graph datasets and representative DGNN architectures demonstrate the effectiveness of DyGC. Notably, our method retains up to 96.2\
Benchmark Results
Tested on 2 datasets 1 baseline value reported too low Non-standard metric on 1 dataset
Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).
Classic
Default metric is F1. The paper reports 0 values on F1 , 8 values on Micro-F1 and 1 value on Macro-F1 .
Sorted by Micro-F1. Highlighted rows are from other papers.
| # | Model | F1 ↑ default | Micro-F1 ↑ | Macro-F1 ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | COLES-S²GC | 0.9540 | —
| — | F1
0.9540 Macro-F1
— |
| 2 | COLES-GCN | 0.9400 | —
| — | F1
0.9400 Macro-F1
— |
| 3 | DyGC | — | 0.4610
±
0.0060 | 0.4570
±
0.0060 | F1
— Macro-F1
0.4570
±
0.0060 |
| 4 | K-Center | — | 0.4220
±
0.0090 | — | F1
— Macro-F1
— |
| 5 | Herding | — | 0.4130
±
0.0070 | — | F1
— Macro-F1
— |
| 6 | Random | — | 0.3920
±
0.0090 | — | F1
— Macro-F1
— |
| 7 | CGC | — | 0.3890
±
0.0110 | — | F1
— Macro-F1
— |
| 8 | GCDM | — | 0.3270
±
0.0100 | — | F1
— Macro-F1
— |
| 9 | SimGC | — | 0.3080
±
0.0090 | — | F1
— Macro-F1
— |
| 10 | GCond | — | 0.2880
±
0.0140 | — | F1
— Macro-F1
— |
Heterogeneous Graph Benchmarks
| # | Model | Micro-F1 ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LMSPS | 0.9566
±0.0020 | |
| 2 | PSHGCN | 0.9561
±0.0012 | |
| 3 | RpHGNN | 0.9555
±0.0029 | |
| 21 | GCN | 0.9460
±0.0031 | |
| 34 | Random | 0.9384
±0.0053 best reported | best at pub: Long-range Meta-path Search on Large-scale Heterogeneous Graphs (NeurIPS 2023) |
| 141 | Whole | 0.7920
±0.0030 | This paper |
| 143 | DyGC | 0.7820
±0.0030 | This paper |
| 158 | SimGC | 0.7400
±0.0080 | This paper |
| 161 | CGC | 0.7290
±0.0100 | This paper |
| 164 | GCDM | 0.7150
±0.0230 | This paper |
| 169 | GCond | 0.6970
±0.0170 | This paper |
| 170 | Herding | 0.6890
±0.0240 | This paper |
| 171 | K-Center | 0.6890
±0.0140 | This paper |
| 176 | MLP | 0.6447
±0.0136 |
