TANGO: Graph Neural Dynamics via Learned Energy and Tangential Flows
Abstract
We introduce TANGO -- a dynamical systems inspired framework for graph representation learning that governs node feature evolution through a learned energy landscape and its associated descent dynamics. At the core of our approach is a learnable Lyapunov function over node embeddings, whose gradient defines an energy-reducing direction that guarantees convergence and stability. To enhance flexibility while preserving the benefits of energy-based dynamics, we incorporate a novel tangential component, learned via message passing, that evolves features while maintaining the energy value. This decomposition into orthogonal flows of energy gradient descent and tangential evolution yields a flexible form of graph dynamics, and enables effective signal propagation even in flat or ill-conditioned energy regions, that often appear in graph learning. Our method mitigates oversquashing and is compatible with different graph neural network backbones. Empirically, TANGO achieves strong performance across a diverse set of node and graph classification and regression benchmarks, demonstrating the effectiveness of jointly learned energy functions and tangential flows for graph neural networks.
Benchmark Results
Tested on 13 datasets 32 baseline values reported too low Non-standard metric on 1 dataset
Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).
LRGB
| # | Model | MAE ↓ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GCN | 0.2421
±0.0016 best reported | best at pub: Can Classic GNNs Be Strong Baselines for Graph-level Tasks? Simple Architectures Meet Excellence (ICML 2025) best today: From Message-Passing to Linearized Graph Sequence Models (2026) |
| 3 | TANGO-GPS | 0.2422
±0.0014 | This paper |
| 2 | IPR-MPNN | 0.2422
±0.0007 | |
| 5 | GIN | 0.2429
±0.0019 | |
| 7 | GatedGCN | 0.2431
±0.0020 best reported | best at pub: Can Classic GNNs Be Strong Baselines for Graph-level Tasks? Simple Architectures Meet Excellence (ICML 2025) best today: From Message-Passing to Linearized Graph Sequence Models (2026) |
| 24 | TANGO-GatedGCN | 0.2451
±0.0006 | This paper |
| 42 | PH-DGN | 0.2465
±0.0020 | This paper |
| 49 | GINE | 0.2473
±0.0017 best reported | best at pub: Where Did the Gap Go? Reassessing the Long-Range Graph Benchmark (TMLR 2023) best today: From Message-Passing to Linearized Graph Sequence Models (2026) |
| 50 | GMN | 0.2473
±0.0025 | This paper |
| 62 | Graph-Mamba | 0.2478
±0.0016 | This paper |
| 68 | SWAN | 0.2485
±0.0009 | This paper |
| 90 | GPS+LapPE | 0.2500
±0.0005 | This paper |
| 104 | DRew-GCN+LapPE | 0.2517
±0.0011 best reported | best today: From Message-Passing to Linearized Graph Sequence Models (2026) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 113 | Transformer+LapPE | 0.2529
±0.0016 | This paper |
| 149 | MixHop-GCN+LapPE | 0.2614
±0.0023 | This paper |
| 150 | DIGL+MPNN+LapPE | 0.2616
±0.0018 | This paper |
| 155 | SAN+LapPE | 0.2680
±0.0040 best reported | best at pub: Learning Efficient Positional Encodings with Graph Neural Networks (ICLR 2025) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 165 | GraphCON | 0.2778
±0.0018 | This paper |
| 170 | A-DGN | 0.2874
±0.0021 | This paper |
| 182 | GRAND | 0.3418
±0.0015 | This paper |
| 183 | GCNII | 0.3471
±0.0010 | This paper |
| 201 | MLP | 0.4351
±0.0008 |
| # | Model | AP ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S^2GCN | 0.7311
±0.0066 | |
| 2 | S4G | 0.7293
±0.0004 | |
| 3 | BuNN | 0.7276
±0.0065 | |
| 4 | GCN | 0.7261
±0.0011 | |
| 12 | DRew-GCN+LapPE | 0.7150
±0.0044 | This paper |
| 11 | DRew-GCN | 0.7150
±0.0044 best reported | best at pub: Spatio-Spectral Graph Neural Networks (NeurIPS 2024) |
| 24 | GMN | 0.7071
±0.0083 | This paper |
| 32 | TANGO-GPS | 0.7021
±0.0043 | This paper |
| 33 | PH-DGN | 0.7012
±0.0045 | This paper |
| 35 | GCNII | 0.6990
±0.0030 best reported | best at pub: LRGB (NeurIPS 2022) |
| 46 | DRew-GIN | 0.6940
±0.0074 | This paper |
| 48 | TANGO-GatedGCN | 0.6892
±0.0040 | This paper |
| 51 | MixHop-GCN+LapPE | 0.6843
±0.0049 | This paper |
| 52 | DIGL+MPNN+LapPE | 0.6830
±0.0026 | This paper |
| 60 | SWAN | 0.6751
±0.0039 | This paper |
| 62 | Graph-Mamba | 0.6739
±0.0087 | This paper |
| 63 | DRew-GatedGCN | 0.6733
±0.0094 | This paper |
| 75 | GRAND | 0.6630
±0.0160 best reported | |
| 81 | MixHop-GCN | 0.6592
±0.0036 | This paper |
| 94 | GPS+LapPE | 0.6535
±0.0041 | This paper |
| 108 | DIGL+MPNN | 0.6469
±0.0019 | This paper |
| 116 | SAN+LapPE | 0.6384
±0.0121 | This paper |
| 118 | Transformer+LapPE | 0.6326
±0.0126 | This paper |
| 137 | GraphCON | 0.6022
±0.0068 | This paper |
| 139 | A-DGN | 0.5975
±0.0044 | This paper |
| 181 | MLP | 0.4060
±0.0021 |
Heterophily Benchmark
| # | Model | Accuracy ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dir-Poly | 0.9451
±0.0022 | |
| 2 | D-CDE | 0.9387
±0.0041 | |
| 3 | LargeScaleNet | 0.9358
±0.0024 | |
| 13 | Tango -GatedGCN | 0.9189
±0.0030 | This paper |
| 25 | Tango -GPS | 0.9108
±0.0057 | This paper |
| 26 | GraphSAGE | 0.9106
±0.0027 | |
| 37 | Exphormer | 0.8903
±0.0037 | This paper |
| 40 | GAT-sep | 0.8875
±0.0041 | This paper |
| 51 | GMN | 0.8769
±0.0050 | This paper |
| 54 | GT-sep | 0.8732
±0.0039 | This paper |
| 56 | GPS -GAT+Performer (RWSE) | 0.8704
±0.0058 | This paper |
| 58 | GAT (RWSE) | 0.8662
±0.0053 | This paper |
| 59 | GT | 0.8651
±0.0073 | This paper |
| 64 | SAGE | 0.8574
±0.0067 | This paper |
| 66 | GCN (RWSE) | 0.8484
±0.0055 | This paper |
| 67 | GPS -GCN+Performer (RWSE) | 0.8472
±0.0065 | This paper |
| 75 | GPS + Mamba | 0.8310
±0.0028 | This paper |
| 82 | GPS | 0.8200
±0.0061 | This paper |
| 92 | FSGNN | 0.7992
±0.0056 | This paper |
| 107 | GBK-GNN | 0.7587
±0.0043 best reported | best at pub: Unleashing the Potential of Fractional Calculus in Graph Neural Networks with FROND (ICLR 2024) best today: Distributed-Order Fractional Graph Operating Network (NeurIPS 2024) |
| 108 | FAGCN | 0.7571
±0.0139 best reported | best at pub: NTFormer: A Composite Node Tokenized Graph Transformer for Node Classification (2024) |
| 111 | Gated-GCN | 0.7446
±0.0054 | This paper |
| 112 | NAGphormer | 0.7434
±0.0077 | This paper |
| 114 | GPR-GNN | 0.7337
±0.0068 best reported | best at pub: Unleashing the Potential of Fractional Calculus in Graph Neural Networks with FROND (ICLR 2024) best today: Distributed-Order Fractional Graph Operating Network (NeurIPS 2024) |
| 117 | GOAT | 0.7159
±0.0125 | This paper |
| 122 | JacobiConv | 0.7114
±0.0042 | This paper |
| 129 | H2GCN | 0.6809
±0.0029 best reported | best at pub: Unleashing the Potential of Fractional Calculus in Graph Neural Networks with FROND (ICLR 2024) best today: Distributed-Order Fractional Graph Operating Network (NeurIPS 2024) |
| 135 | MLP | 0.6665
±0.0047 | |
| 152 | CPGNN | 0.6396
±0.0062 | This paper |
| 154 | GloGNN | 0.6385
±0.0049 best reported | best at pub: Unleashing the Potential of Fractional Calculus in Graph Neural Networks with FROND (ICLR 2024) best today: Distributed-Order Fractional Graph Operating Network (NeurIPS 2024) |
| # | Model | Accuracy ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UniGAP | 0.6375
±0.0110 | |
| 2 | H2GCN + HalfHop | 0.5961
±0.0100 | |
| 3 | GraphSAGE + HalfHop | 0.5897
±0.0150 | |
| 7 | H2GCN | 0.5681
±0.0090 best reported | |
| 12 | SAGE | 0.5569
±0.0023 best reported | best at pub: Graph Neural Networks for Graphs with Heterophily: A Survey (2022) |
| 15 | GraphSAGE | 0.5540
±0.0020 | |
| 25 | GMN | 0.5407
±0.0031 | This paper |
| 27 | Tango -GPS | 0.5383
±0.0032 | This paper |
| 32 | Exphormer | 0.5351
±0.0046 | This paper |
| 45 | GPS | 0.5310
±0.0042 | This paper |
| 50 | FSGNN | 0.5274
±0.0083 | This paper |
| 52 | GAT-sep | 0.5270
±0.0062 | This paper |
| 55 | Tango -GatedGCN | 0.5260
±0.0053 | This paper |
| 62 | GT-sep | 0.5218
±0.0080 | This paper |
| 66 | GAT (DEG) | 0.5165
±0.0060 | This paper |
| 71 | NAGphormer | 0.5126
±0.0072 | This paper |
| 72 | GT | 0.5117
±0.0066 | This paper |
| 77 | GPS -GAT+Performer (DEG) | 0.5103
±0.0060 | This paper |
| 84 | MLP | 0.5058 | |
| 93 | GCN (DEG) | 0.5001
±0.0069 | This paper |
| 103 | GPR-GNN | 0.4937
±0.0071 best reported | best at pub: Piecewise Constant Spectral Graph Neural Network (TMLR 2025) |
| 108 | GPS -GCN+Performer (DEG) | 0.4893
±0.0047 | This paper |
| 114 | JacobiConv | 0.4853
±0.0096 best reported | best at pub: Piecewise Constant Spectral Graph Neural Network (TMLR 2025) |
| 137 | FAGCN | 0.4632
±0.0250 best reported | best at pub: Unleashing the Potential of Fractional Calculus in Graph Neural Networks with FROND (ICLR 2024) best today: Distributed-Order Fractional Graph Operating Network (NeurIPS 2024) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 140 | GBK-GNN | 0.4598
±0.0071 | This paper |
| 147 | GPS + Mamba | 0.4513
±0.0097 | This paper |
| 152 | GOAT | 0.4461
±0.0050 | This paper |
| 154 | CPGNN | 0.4436
±0.0035 best reported | best at pub: Unleashing the Potential of Fractional Calculus in Graph Neural Networks with FROND (ICLR 2024) best today: Distributed-Order Fractional Graph Operating Network (NeurIPS 2024) |
| 167 | Gated-GCN | 0.4300
±0.0032 | This paper |
| 196 | GloGNN | 0.3728
±0.0066 best reported | best at pub: Unleashing the Potential of Fractional Calculus in Graph Neural Networks with FROND (ICLR 2024) best today: Distributed-Order Fractional Graph Operating Network (NeurIPS 2024) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| # | Model | ROC-AUC ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BuNN | 0.9899
±0.0016 | |
| 2 | DC-GNN | 0.9850
±0.0021 | |
| 3 | Tango -GPS | 0.9839
±0.0054 | This paper |
| 4 | Tango -GatedGCN | 0.9832
±0.0059 | This paper |
| 26 | GCN (LapPE) | 0.9426
±0.0049 | This paper |
| 37 | GAT-sep | 0.9391
±0.0035 | This paper |
| 38 | GPS -GCN+Performer (LapPE) | 0.9385
±0.0041 | This paper |
| 42 | GraphSAGE | 0.9358
±0.0005 | |
| 46 | SAGE | 0.9351
±0.0057 | This paper |
| 47 | GAT (LapPE) | 0.9350
±0.0054 | This paper |
| 53 | GPS -GAT+Performer (LapPE) | 0.9262
±0.0079 | This paper |
| 57 | GT-sep | 0.9229
±0.0047 | This paper |
| 58 | GPS -GAT+Transformer (LapPE) | 0.9229
±0.0061 | This paper |
| 59 | Exphormer | 0.9226
±0.0056 best reported | best at pub: Even Sparser Graph Transformers (NeurIPS 2024) |
| 63 | GT | 0.9185
±0.0076 | This paper |
| 65 | GPS -GCN+Transformer (LapPE) | 0.9182
±0.0041 | This paper |
| 74 | GMN | 0.9101
±0.0023 | This paper |
| 76 | GBK-GNN | 0.9085
±0.0058 | This paper |
| 80 | GPS | 0.9063
±0.0067 | This paper |
| 83 | FSGNN | 0.9008
±0.0070 | This paper |
| 85 | H2GCN | 0.8995
±0.0038 best reported | best at pub: Distributed-Order Fractional Graph Operating Network (NeurIPS 2024) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 88 | GPS + Mamba | 0.8993
±0.0054 | This paper |
| 91 | FAGCN | 0.8969
±0.0060 best reported | best at pub: Distributed-Order Fractional Graph Operating Network (NeurIPS 2024) |
| 93 | JacobiConv | 0.8966
±0.0040 | This paper |
| 106 | Gated-GCN | 0.8754
±0.0122 | This paper |
| 110 | GPR-GNN | 0.8624
±0.0061 | This paper |
| 113 | NAGphormer | 0.8419
±0.0066 | This paper |
| 118 | GOAT | 0.8109
±0.0102 | This paper |
| 137 | CPGNN | 0.7127
±0.0114 best reported | best at pub: Distributed-Order Fractional Graph Operating Network (NeurIPS 2024) |
| 148 | GloGNN | 0.6253
±0.0134 best reported | best at pub: Distributed-Order Fractional Graph Operating Network (NeurIPS 2024) |
| 156 | MLP | 0.5099
±0.0147 |
| # | Model | ROC-AUC ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Polynormer-r | 0.8591
±0.0074 | |
| 2 | DC-GNN | 0.8588
±0.0081 | |
| 3 | TANGO-GPS | 0.8566
±0.0101 | This paper |
| 4 | Tango -GPS | 0.8566
±0.0101 | This paper |
| 5 | TANGO-GatedGCN | 0.8551
±0.0098 | This paper |
| 6 | Tango -GatedGCN | 0.8551
±0.0098 | This paper |
| 11 | GCN (RWSE) | 0.8511
±0.0077 | This paper |
| 14 | GAT (RWSE) | 0.8502
±0.0067 | This paper |
| 20 | GPS -GCN+Performer (RWSE) | 0.8481
±0.0086 | This paper |
| 23 | GPS -GAT+Transformer (LapPE) | 0.8470
±0.0056 | This paper |
| 25 | GPS -GAT+Performer (LapPE) | 0.8462
±0.0054 | This paper |
| 26 | GMN | 0.8452
±0.0021 | This paper |
| 27 | Co-GNN(μ,μ) | 0.8445
±0.0117 | This paper |
| 30 | GPS_GAT+Performer (RWSE) | 0.8438
±0.0091 | This paper |
| 41 | GAT-sep | 0.8378
±0.0043 | This paper |
| 42 | Exphormer | 0.8377
±0.0078 | This paper |
| 47 | GPS | 0.8371
±0.0048 | This paper |
| 48 | GPS + Mamba | 0.8370
±0.0105 | This paper |
| 50 | GCN | 0.8364
±0.0067 | |
| 52 | GPS -GCN+Transformer (RWSE) | 0.8353
±0.0106 | This paper |
| 61 | GT | 0.8323
±0.0064 | This paper |
| 62 | GOAT | 0.8311
±0.0104 | This paper |
| 66 | FSGNN | 0.8276
±0.0061 | This paper |
| 73 | GT-sep | 0.8252
±0.0092 | This paper |
| 76 | SAGE | 0.8243
±0.0044 | This paper |
| 85 | GBK-GNN | 0.8101
±0.0067 | This paper |
| 110 | NAGphormer | 0.7832
±0.0095 | This paper |
| 113 | H2GCN | 0.7815 best reported | |
| 116 | FAGCN | 0.7812 best reported | best at pub: Language Models as Messengers: Enhancing Message Passing in Heterophilic Graph Learning (2025) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 127 | Gated-GCN | 0.7731
±0.0114 | This paper |
| 139 | MLP | 0.7362
±0.0020 | |
| 140 | GloGNN | 0.7339
±0.0117 | This paper |
| 141 | CPGNN | 0.7336
±0.0101 | This paper |
| 143 | GPR-GNN | 0.7294
±0.0097 | This paper |
| 154 | JacobiConv | 0.6866
±0.0065 | This paper |
| # | Model | ROC-AUC ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NID_GAT | 0.9703
±0.0002 | |
| 2 | NID_GCN | 0.9685
±0.0010 | |
| 3 | UniGAP | 0.8421
±0.0080 | |
| 6 | Tango -GatedGCN | 0.8039
±0.0104 | This paper |
| 7 | Tango -GPS | 0.8032
±0.0107 | This paper |
| 13 | H2GCN | 0.7928
±0.0080 best reported | |
| 16 | GCN | 0.7902
±0.0060 | |
| 21 | FSGNN | 0.7886
±0.0092 | This paper |
| 29 | GT-sep | 0.7805
±0.0093 | This paper |
| 30 | GT | 0.7795
±0.0068 | This paper |
| 33 | GPS -GCN+Performer (LapPE) | 0.7785
±0.0125 | This paper |
| 34 | GAT (RWSE) | 0.7783
±0.0122 | This paper |
| 36 | GCN (RWSE) | 0.7781
±0.0140 | This paper |
| 43 | FAGCN | 0.7724
±0.0126 | This paper |
| 48 | GPS -GAT+Performer (RWSE) | 0.7714
±0.0149 | This paper |
| 54 | GAT-sep | 0.7679
±0.0071 | This paper |
| 56 | Gated-GCN | 0.7661
±0.0113 | This paper |
| 58 | SAGE | 0.7644
±0.0062 | This paper |
| 66 | GOAT | 0.7576
±0.0166 | This paper |
| 81 | GBK-GNN | 0.7447
±0.0086 | This paper |
| 83 | Exphormer | 0.7394
±0.0106 | This paper |
| 85 | JacobiConv | 0.7388
±0.0116 | This paper |
| 86 | GPR-GNN | 0.7341
±0.0124 best reported | best at pub: Distributed-Order Fractional Graph Operating Network (NeurIPS 2024) |
| 90 | GPS | 0.7173
±0.0147 | This paper |
| 96 | MLP | 0.7082
±0.0010 | |
| 116 | NAGphormer | 0.6817
±0.0153 | This paper |
| 119 | GloGNN | 0.6715
±0.0192 best reported | best at pub: Distributed-Order Fractional Graph Operating Network (NeurIPS 2024) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 120 | CPGNN | 0.6709
±0.0263 best reported | best at pub: Distributed-Order Fractional Graph Operating Network (NeurIPS 2024) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
GNNBenchmark
| # | Model | Accuracy ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schrödinger | 0.9913
±0.0004 | |
| 2 | CNN | 0.9907
±0.0007 | |
| 3 | MPNN | 0.9895
±0.0006 | |
| 11 | GatedGCN | 0.9855
±0.0002 best reported | best at pub: RandAlign: A Parameter-Free Method for Regularizing Graph Convolutional Networks (2024) |
| 32 | GIN | 0.9833
±0.0011 best reported | best at pub: Graph-Coupled Oscillator Networks (ICML 2022) |
| 44 | TANGO-GPS | 0.9820
±0.0011 | This paper |
| 47 | EGT | 0.9817
±0.0009 | This paper |
| 56 | GRIT | 0.9811
±0.0011 | This paper |
| 59 | GPS | 0.9808
±0.0011 best reported | best at pub: Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph Transformer (NeurIPS 2022) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 74 | CRaW1 | 0.9794
±0.0005 | This paper |
| 75 | PNA | 0.9794
±0.0012 | This paper |
| 80 | TANGO-GatedGCN | 0.9779
±0.0010 | This paper |
| 86 | GAT | 0.9755
±0.0003 best reported | best at pub: RandAlign: A Parameter-Free Method for Regularizing Graph Convolutional Networks (2024) |
| 95 | GraphSAGE | 0.9731
±0.0010 | |
| 126 | MLP | 0.9534
±0.0014 | |
| 135 | GCN | 0.9405
±0.0005 best reported | best at pub: RandAlign: A Parameter-Free Method for Regularizing Graph Convolutional Networks (2024) |
| # | Model | Accuracy ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RandAlign | 0.7942
±0.0007 | |
| 2 | differential encoding | 0.7907
±0.0027 | |
| 3 | PPGT | 0.7856
±0.0070 | |
| 7 | GRIT | 0.7647
±0.0088 | This paper |
| 13 | TANGO-GPS | 0.7578
±0.0026 | This paper |
| 38 | PNA | 0.7311
±0.0011 best reported | best at pub: From Stars to Subgraphs: Uplifting Any GNN with Local Structure Awareness (ICLR 2021) |
| 40 | DGN | 0.7284
±0.0042 best reported | best at pub: From Stars to Subgraphs: Uplifting Any GNN with Local Structure Awareness (ICLR 2021) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 44 | GIN-AK+ | 0.7239
±0.0038 best reported | best at pub: Improving Subgraph-GNNs via Edge-Level Ego-Network Encodings (TMLR 2023) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 46 | GPS | 0.7236
±0.0032 best reported | best at pub: Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph Transformer (NeurIPS 2022) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 62 | GatedGCN | 0.7133
±0.0039 best reported | best at pub: Formatting Instructions for ICLR 2021 Conference Submissions (2020) |
| 64 | TANGO-GatedGCN | 0.7089
±0.0033 | This paper |
| 81 | CRaW1 | 0.6901
±0.0026 | This paper |
| 82 | EGT | 0.6870
±0.0041 | This paper |
| 92 | GraphSAGE | 0.6690
±0.0020 | |
| 101 | GAT | 0.6611
±0.0098 best reported | best at pub: Formatting Instructions for ICLR 2021 Conference Submissions (2020) |
| 109 | GIN | 0.6510
±0.0050 best reported | best at pub: Beyond Low-pass Filtering: Graph Convolutional Networks with Automatic Filtering (2021) |
| 124 | GCN | 0.5839
±0.0073 best reported | best at pub: From Stars to Subgraphs: Uplifting Any GNN with Local Structure Awareness (ICLR 2021) |
| 126 | MLP | 0.5634
±0.0018 |
| # | Model | Accuracy ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GRPE-Small | 0.8159
±0.0019 | |
| 2 | TANGO-GPS | 0.8011
±0.0014 | This paper |
| 3 | GRIT | 0.8003
±0.0028 | This paper |
| 6 | EGT | 0.7923
±0.0035 | This paper |
| 16 | TANGO-GatedGCN | 0.7819
±0.0031 | This paper |
| 22 | GPS | 0.7802
±0.0018 | This paper |
| 50 | SAN | 0.7669
±0.0065 | This paper |
| 54 | GatedGCN | 0.7608
±0.0020 best reported | best at pub: GRPE: Relative Positional Encoding for Graph Transformer (2022) |
| 67 | GAT | 0.7059
±0.0045 | This paper |
| 70 | GCN | 0.6903
±0.0137 best reported | best at pub: Recurrent Distance Filtering for Graph Representation Learning (ICML 2023) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 79 | GIN | 0.6472
±0.0155 | This paper |
| 80 | GraphSAGE | 0.6388
±0.0011 | |
| 114 | MLP | 0.2097
±0.0000 |
| # | Model | Accuracy ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DeepGraph (48) | 0.9066
±0.0006 | |
| 2 | GRIT (our run) | 0.9041
±0.0023 | |
| 3 | GRIT 2-QiQRW | 0.9016
±0.0045 | |
| 6 | GRIT | 0.8722
±0.0003 best reported | best at pub: Benchmarking Positional Encodings for GNNs and Graph Transformers (KDD 2024) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 8 | TANGO-GPS | 0.8718
±0.0006 | This paper |
| 19 | GIN-AK+ | 0.8685
±0.0006 | This paper |
| 24 | EGT | 0.8682
±0.0002 | This paper |
| 50 | GPS | 0.8669
±0.0006 | This paper |
| 51 | DGN | 0.8668
±0.0003 | This paper |
| 53 | TANGO-GatedGCN | 0.8667
±0.0007 | This paper |
| 58 | SAN | 0.8658
±0.0004 | This paper |
| 66 | GatedGCN | 0.8651
±0.0008 best reported | best at pub: IJCAI--23 Formatting Instructions (IJCAI 2023) |
| 88 | GCN | 0.8561
±0.0003 best reported | best at pub: Recurrent Distance Filtering for Graph Representation Learning (ICML 2023) |
| 89 | GIN | 0.8559
±0.0001 best reported | best at pub: Factorizable Graph Convolutional Networks (NeurIPS 2020) best today: GNNBenchmark (JMLR 2023) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 107 | GAT | 0.7827
±0.0019 | This paper |
| 123 | MLP | 0.5052 | |
| 124 | GraphSAGE | 0.5052
±0.0000 |
Algorithmic Graph Tasks
| # | Model | MSE ↓ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TANGO-GPS | -5.5263
±0.0838 | This paper |
| 2 | TANGO-GatedGCN | -5.0626
±0.0742 | This paper |
| 3 | PH-DGN | -4.2993
±0.0721 | This paper |
| 5 | GPS | -3.5990
±0.1949 | This paper |
| 7 | SWAN | -3.5425
±0.0830 | This paper |
| 8 | GatedGCN | -3.2610
±0.0514 | This paper |
| 10 | A-DGN | -3.2417
±0.0751 | This paper |
| 14 | GraphCON | -1.3836
±0.0092 | This paper |
| 15 | GCNII | -1.1329
±0.0135 | This paper |
| 16 | GIN | -0.5408
±0.4193 | This paper |
| 17 | DGC | -0.1483
±0.0231 | This paper |
| 18 | GRAND | -0.0942
±0.3897 | This paper |
| 19 | GraphSAGE | 0.2863
±0.1843 | This paper |
| 20 | GAT | 0.6951
±0.1499 | This paper |
| 21 | GCN | 0.9499
±0.0001 | This paper |
Eccentricity
Global leaderboard →Sorted by log10(MSE). Highlighted rows are from other papers.
| # | Model | log10(MSE) ↓ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TANGO-GPS | -2.1455 | This paper |
| 2 | TANGO-GatedGCN | -1.7419 | This paper |
| 3 | PH-DGN | -0.9348 | This paper |
| 4 | SWAN | -0.0739 | This paper |
