TANGO: Graph Neural Dynamics via Learned Energy and Tangential Flows

Moshe Eliasof, Eldad Haber, C. Schönlieb

Main figure for TANGO: Graph Neural Dynamics via Learned Energy and Tangential Flows

Abstract

We introduce TANGO -- a dynamical systems inspired framework for graph representation learning that governs node feature evolution through a learned energy landscape and its associated descent dynamics. At the core of our approach is a learnable Lyapunov function over node embeddings, whose gradient defines an energy-reducing direction that guarantees convergence and stability. To enhance flexibility while preserving the benefits of energy-based dynamics, we incorporate a novel tangential component, learned via message passing, that evolves features while maintaining the energy value. This decomposition into orthogonal flows of energy gradient descent and tangential evolution yields a flexible form of graph dynamics, and enables effective signal propagation even in flat or ill-conditioned energy regions, that often appear in graph learning. Our method mitigates oversquashing and is compatible with different graph neural network backbones. Empirically, TANGO achieves strong performance across a diverse set of node and graph classification and regression benchmarks, demonstrating the effectiveness of jointly learned energy functions and tangential flows for graph neural networks.

Benchmark Results

Tested on 13 datasets 32 baseline values reported too low Non-standard metric on 1 dataset

Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).

LRGB

#ModelMAE ↓Paper
1
GCN
actual #1 vs paper #183 182 places worse
0.2421 ±0.0016
best reported
actual #1 vs paper #183 182 places worse
paper 0.3496 ±0.0013
3
TANGO-GPS
0.2422 ±0.0014
This paper
2
IPR-MPNN
0.2422 ±0.0007
5
GIN
0.2429 ±0.0019
7
GatedGCN
actual #7 vs paper #182 175 places worse
0.2431 ±0.0020
best reported
actual #7 vs paper #182 175 places worse
paper 0.3420 ±0.0013
24
TANGO-GatedGCN
0.2451 ±0.0006
This paper
42
PH-DGN
0.2465 ±0.0020
This paper
49
GINE
actual #49 vs paper #184 135 places worse
0.2473 ±0.0017
best reported
actual #49 vs paper #184 135 places worse
paper 0.3547 ±0.0045
paper 0.3547 ±0.0045 Δ at pub 0.1074 Δ today 0.1074
50
GMN
0.2473 ±0.0025
This paper
62
Graph-Mamba
0.2478 ±0.0016
This paper
68
SWAN
0.2485 ±0.0009
This paper
90
GPS+LapPE
0.2500 ±0.0005
This paper
104
DRew-GCN+LapPE
actual #104 vs paper #114 10 places worse
0.2517 ±0.0011
best reported
actual #104 vs paper #114 10 places worse
paper 0.2536 ±0.0015

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.2536 ±0.0015 Δ today 0.0019
113
Transformer+LapPE
0.2529 ±0.0016
This paper
149
MixHop-GCN+LapPE
0.2614 ±0.0023
This paper
150
DIGL+MPNN+LapPE
0.2616 ±0.0018
This paper
155
SAN+LapPE
actual #155 vs paper #155
0.2680 ±0.0040
best reported
actual #155 vs paper #155
paper 0.2683 ±0.0043

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.2683 ±0.0043 Δ at pub 0.0003
165
GraphCON
0.2778 ±0.0018
This paper
170
A-DGN
0.2874 ±0.0021
This paper
182
GRAND
0.3418 ±0.0015
This paper
183
GCNII
0.3471 ±0.0010
This paper
201
MLP
0.4351 ±0.0008
#ModelAP ↑Paper
1
S^2GCN
0.7311 ±0.0066
2
S4G
0.7293 ±0.0004
3
BuNN
0.7276 ±0.0065
4
GCN
0.7261 ±0.0011
12
DRew-GCN+LapPE
0.7150 ±0.0044
This paper
11
DRew-GCN
actual #11 vs paper #34 23 places worse
0.7150 ±0.0044
best reported
actual #11 vs paper #34 23 places worse
paper 0.6996 ±0.0076
best at pub: Spatio-Spectral Graph Neural Networks (NeurIPS 2024)
paper 0.6996 ±0.0076 Δ at pub 0.0154
24
GMN
0.7071 ±0.0083
This paper
32
TANGO-GPS
0.7021 ±0.0043
This paper
33
PH-DGN
0.7012 ±0.0045
This paper
35
GCNII
actual #35 vs paper #159 124 places worse
0.6990 ±0.0030
best reported
actual #35 vs paper #159 124 places worse
paper 0.5543 ±0.0078
best at pub: LRGB (NeurIPS 2022)
paper 0.5543 ±0.0078 Δ today 0.1447
46
DRew-GIN
0.6940 ±0.0074
This paper
48
TANGO-GatedGCN
0.6892 ±0.0040
This paper
51
MixHop-GCN+LapPE
0.6843 ±0.0049
This paper
52
DIGL+MPNN+LapPE
0.6830 ±0.0026
This paper
60
SWAN
0.6751 ±0.0039
This paper
62
Graph-Mamba
0.6739 ±0.0087
This paper
63
DRew-GatedGCN
0.6733 ±0.0094
This paper
75
GRAND
actual #75 vs paper #156 81 places worse
0.6630 ±0.0160
best reported
actual #75 vs paper #156 81 places worse
paper 0.5789 ±0.0062
81
MixHop-GCN
0.6592 ±0.0036
This paper
94
GPS+LapPE
0.6535 ±0.0041
This paper
108
DIGL+MPNN
0.6469 ±0.0019
This paper
116
SAN+LapPE
0.6384 ±0.0121
This paper
118
Transformer+LapPE
0.6326 ±0.0126
This paper
137
GraphCON
0.6022 ±0.0068
This paper
139
A-DGN
0.5975 ±0.0044
This paper
181
MLP
0.4060 ±0.0021

Heterophily Benchmark

#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
Dir-Poly
0.9451 ±0.0022
2
D-CDE
0.9387 ±0.0041
3
LargeScaleNet
0.9358 ±0.0024
13
Tango -GatedGCN
0.9189 ±0.0030
This paper
25
Tango -GPS
0.9108 ±0.0057
This paper
26
GraphSAGE
0.9106 ±0.0027
37
Exphormer
0.8903 ±0.0037
This paper
40
GAT-sep
0.8875 ±0.0041
This paper
51
GMN
0.8769 ±0.0050
This paper
54
GT-sep
0.8732 ±0.0039
This paper
56
GPS -GAT+Performer (RWSE)
0.8704 ±0.0058
This paper
58
GAT (RWSE)
0.8662 ±0.0053
This paper
59
GT
0.8651 ±0.0073
This paper
64
SAGE
0.8574 ±0.0067
This paper
66
GCN (RWSE)
0.8484 ±0.0055
This paper
67
GPS -GCN+Performer (RWSE)
0.8472 ±0.0065
This paper
75
GPS + Mamba
0.8310 ±0.0028
This paper
82
GPS
0.8200 ±0.0061
This paper
92
FSGNN
0.7992 ±0.0056
This paper
107
GBK-GNN
actual #107 vs paper #109 2 places worse
0.7587 ±0.0043
best reported
actual #107 vs paper #109 2 places worse
paper 0.7457 ±0.0047
paper 0.7457 ±0.0047 Δ at pub 0.0130 Δ today 0.0130
108
FAGCN
actual #108 vs paper #142 34 places worse
0.7571 ±0.0139
best reported
actual #108 vs paper #142 34 places worse
paper 0.6522 ±0.0056
paper 0.6522 ±0.0056 Δ at pub 0.1049
111
Gated-GCN
0.7446 ±0.0054
This paper
112
NAGphormer
0.7434 ±0.0077
This paper
114
GPR-GNN
actual #114 vs paper #144 30 places worse
0.7337 ±0.0068
best reported
actual #114 vs paper #144 30 places worse
paper 0.6485 ±0.0027
paper 0.6485 ±0.0027 Δ at pub 0.0852 Δ today 0.0852
117
GOAT
0.7159 ±0.0125
This paper
122
JacobiConv
0.7114 ±0.0042
This paper
129
H2GCN
actual #129 vs paper #164 35 places worse
0.6809 ±0.0029
best reported
actual #129 vs paper #164 35 places worse
paper 0.6011 ±0.0052
paper 0.6011 ±0.0052 Δ at pub 0.0798 Δ today 0.0798
135
MLP
0.6665 ±0.0047
152
CPGNN
0.6396 ±0.0062
This paper
154
GloGNN
actual #154 vs paper #167 13 places worse
0.6385 ±0.0049
best reported
actual #154 vs paper #167 13 places worse
paper 0.5963 ±0.0069
paper 0.5963 ±0.0069 Δ at pub 0.0422 Δ today 0.0422
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
UniGAP
0.6375 ±0.0110
2
H2GCN + HalfHop
0.5961 ±0.0100
3
GraphSAGE + HalfHop
0.5897 ±0.0150
7
H2GCN
actual #7 vs paper #196 189 places worse
0.5681 ±0.0090
best reported
actual #7 vs paper #196 189 places worse
paper 0.3647 ±0.0023
12
SAGE
actual #12 vs paper #30 18 places worse
0.5569 ±0.0023
best reported
actual #12 vs paper #30 18 places worse
paper 0.5363 ±0.0039
15
GraphSAGE
0.5540 ±0.0020
25
GMN
0.5407 ±0.0031
This paper
27
Tango -GPS
0.5383 ±0.0032
This paper
32
Exphormer
0.5351 ±0.0046
This paper
45
GPS
0.5310 ±0.0042
This paper
50
FSGNN
0.5274 ±0.0083
This paper
52
GAT-sep
0.5270 ±0.0062
This paper
55
Tango -GatedGCN
0.5260 ±0.0053
This paper
62
GT-sep
0.5218 ±0.0080
This paper
66
GAT (DEG)
0.5165 ±0.0060
This paper
71
NAGphormer
0.5126 ±0.0072
This paper
72
GT
0.5117 ±0.0066
This paper
77
GPS -GAT+Performer (DEG)
0.5103 ±0.0060
This paper
84
MLP
0.5058
93
GCN (DEG)
0.5001 ±0.0069
This paper
103
GPR-GNN
actual #103 vs paper #148 45 places worse
0.4937 ±0.0071
best reported
actual #103 vs paper #148 45 places worse
paper 0.4488 ±0.0034
paper 0.4488 ±0.0034 Δ at pub 0.0449
108
GPS -GCN+Performer (DEG)
0.4893 ±0.0047
This paper
114
JacobiConv
actual #114 vs paper #162 48 places worse
0.4853 ±0.0096
best reported
actual #114 vs paper #162 48 places worse
paper 0.4355 ±0.0048
paper 0.4355 ±0.0048 Δ at pub 0.0498
137
FAGCN
actual #137 vs paper #156 19 places worse
0.4632 ±0.0250
best reported
actual #137 vs paper #156 19 places worse
paper 0.4412 ±0.0030

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.4412 ±0.0030 Δ at pub 0.0220 Δ today 0.0220
140
GBK-GNN
0.4598 ±0.0071
This paper
147
GPS + Mamba
0.4513 ±0.0097
This paper
152
GOAT
0.4461 ±0.0050
This paper
154
CPGNN
actual #154 vs paper #188 34 places worse
0.4436 ±0.0035
best reported
actual #154 vs paper #188 34 places worse
paper 0.3979 ±0.0077
paper 0.3979 ±0.0077 Δ at pub 0.0457 Δ today 0.0457
167
Gated-GCN
0.4300 ±0.0032
This paper
196
GloGNN
actual #196 vs paper #196
0.3728 ±0.0066
best reported
actual #196 vs paper #196
paper 0.3689 ±0.0014

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.3689 ±0.0014 Δ at pub 0.0039 Δ today 0.0039
#ModelROC-AUC ↑Paper
1
BuNN
0.9899 ±0.0016
2
DC-GNN
0.9850 ±0.0021
3
Tango -GPS
0.9839 ±0.0054
This paper
4
Tango -GatedGCN
0.9832 ±0.0059
This paper
26
GCN (LapPE)
0.9426 ±0.0049
This paper
37
GAT-sep
0.9391 ±0.0035
This paper
38
GPS -GCN+Performer (LapPE)
0.9385 ±0.0041
This paper
42
GraphSAGE
0.9358 ±0.0005
46
SAGE
0.9351 ±0.0057
This paper
47
GAT (LapPE)
0.9350 ±0.0054
This paper
53
GPS -GAT+Performer (LapPE)
0.9262 ±0.0079
This paper
57
GT-sep
0.9229 ±0.0047
This paper
58
GPS -GAT+Transformer (LapPE)
0.9229 ±0.0061
This paper
59
Exphormer
actual #59 vs paper #76 17 places worse
0.9226 ±0.0056
best reported
actual #59 vs paper #76 17 places worse
paper 0.9074 ±0.0053
best at pub: Even Sparser Graph Transformers (NeurIPS 2024)
paper 0.9074 ±0.0053 Δ at pub 0.0152
63
GT
0.9185 ±0.0076
This paper
65
GPS -GCN+Transformer (LapPE)
0.9182 ±0.0041
This paper
74
GMN
0.9101 ±0.0023
This paper
76
GBK-GNN
0.9085 ±0.0058
This paper
80
GPS
0.9063 ±0.0067
This paper
83
FSGNN
0.9008 ±0.0070
This paper
85
H2GCN
actual #85 vs paper #88 3 places worse
0.8995 ±0.0038
best reported
actual #85 vs paper #88 3 places worse
paper 0.8971 ±0.0031

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8971 ±0.0031 Δ at pub 0.0024
88
GPS + Mamba
0.8993 ±0.0054
This paper
91
FAGCN
actual #91 vs paper #103 12 places worse
0.8969 ±0.0060
best reported
actual #91 vs paper #103 12 places worse
paper 0.8817 ±0.0073
paper 0.8817 ±0.0073 Δ at pub 0.0152
93
JacobiConv
0.8966 ±0.0040
This paper
106
Gated-GCN
0.8754 ±0.0122
This paper
110
GPR-GNN
0.8624 ±0.0061
This paper
113
NAGphormer
0.8419 ±0.0066
This paper
118
GOAT
0.8109 ±0.0102
This paper
137
CPGNN
actual #137 vs paper #155 18 places worse
0.7127 ±0.0114
best reported
actual #137 vs paper #155 18 places worse
paper 0.5203 ±0.0546
paper 0.5203 ±0.0546 Δ at pub 0.1924
148
GloGNN
actual #148 vs paper #155 7 places worse
0.6253 ±0.0134
best reported
actual #148 vs paper #155 7 places worse
paper 0.5108 ±0.0123
paper 0.5108 ±0.0123 Δ at pub 0.1145
156
MLP
0.5099 ±0.0147
#ModelROC-AUC ↑Paper
1
Polynormer-r
0.8591 ±0.0074
2
DC-GNN
0.8588 ±0.0081
3
TANGO-GPS
0.8566 ±0.0101
This paper
4
Tango -GPS
0.8566 ±0.0101
This paper
5
TANGO-GatedGCN
0.8551 ±0.0098
This paper
6
Tango -GatedGCN
0.8551 ±0.0098
This paper
11
GCN (RWSE)
0.8511 ±0.0077
This paper
14
GAT (RWSE)
0.8502 ±0.0067
This paper
20
GPS -GCN+Performer (RWSE)
0.8481 ±0.0086
This paper
23
GPS -GAT+Transformer (LapPE)
0.8470 ±0.0056
This paper
25
GPS -GAT+Performer (LapPE)
0.8462 ±0.0054
This paper
26
GMN
0.8452 ±0.0021
This paper
27
Co-GNN(μ,μ)
0.8445 ±0.0117
This paper
30
GPS_GAT+Performer (RWSE)
0.8438 ±0.0091
This paper
41
GAT-sep
0.8378 ±0.0043
This paper
42
Exphormer
0.8377 ±0.0078
This paper
47
GPS
0.8371 ±0.0048
This paper
48
GPS + Mamba
0.8370 ±0.0105
This paper
50
GCN
0.8364 ±0.0067
52
GPS -GCN+Transformer (RWSE)
0.8353 ±0.0106
This paper
61
GT
0.8323 ±0.0064
This paper
62
GOAT
0.8311 ±0.0104
This paper
66
FSGNN
0.8276 ±0.0061
This paper
73
GT-sep
0.8252 ±0.0092
This paper
76
SAGE
0.8243 ±0.0044
This paper
85
GBK-GNN
0.8101 ±0.0067
This paper
110
NAGphormer
0.7832 ±0.0095
This paper
113
H2GCN
actual #113 vs paper #141 28 places worse
0.7815
best reported
actual #113 vs paper #141 28 places worse
paper 0.7335 ±0.0101
paper 0.7335 ±0.0101 Δ at pub 0.0480
116
FAGCN
actual #116 vs paper #122 6 places worse
0.7812
best reported
actual #116 vs paper #122 6 places worse
paper 0.7775 ±0.0105

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7775 ±0.0105 Δ at pub 0.0037
127
Gated-GCN
0.7731 ±0.0114
This paper
139
MLP
0.7362 ±0.0020
140
GloGNN
0.7339 ±0.0117
This paper
141
CPGNN
0.7336 ±0.0101
This paper
143
GPR-GNN
0.7294 ±0.0097
This paper
154
JacobiConv
0.6866 ±0.0065
This paper
#ModelROC-AUC ↑Paper
1
NID_GAT
0.9703 ±0.0002
2
NID_GCN
0.9685 ±0.0010
3
UniGAP
0.8421 ±0.0080
6
Tango -GatedGCN
0.8039 ±0.0104
This paper
7
Tango -GPS
0.8032 ±0.0107
This paper
13
H2GCN
actual #13 vs paper #131 118 places worse
0.7928 ±0.0080
best reported
actual #13 vs paper #131 118 places worse
paper 0.6359 ±0.0146
16
GCN
0.7902 ±0.0060
21
FSGNN
0.7886 ±0.0092
This paper
29
GT-sep
0.7805 ±0.0093
This paper
30
GT
0.7795 ±0.0068
This paper
33
GPS -GCN+Performer (LapPE)
0.7785 ±0.0125
This paper
34
GAT (RWSE)
0.7783 ±0.0122
This paper
36
GCN (RWSE)
0.7781 ±0.0140
This paper
43
FAGCN
0.7724 ±0.0126
This paper
48
GPS -GAT+Performer (RWSE)
0.7714 ±0.0149
This paper
54
GAT-sep
0.7679 ±0.0071
This paper
56
Gated-GCN
0.7661 ±0.0113
This paper
58
SAGE
0.7644 ±0.0062
This paper
66
GOAT
0.7576 ±0.0166
This paper
81
GBK-GNN
0.7447 ±0.0086
This paper
83
Exphormer
0.7394 ±0.0106
This paper
85
JacobiConv
0.7388 ±0.0116
This paper
86
GPR-GNN
actual #86 vs paper #149 63 places worse
0.7341 ±0.0124
best reported
actual #86 vs paper #149 63 places worse
paper 0.5548 ±0.0091
paper 0.5548 ±0.0091 Δ at pub 0.1793
90
GPS
0.7173 ±0.0147
This paper
96
MLP
0.7082 ±0.0010
116
NAGphormer
0.6817 ±0.0153
This paper
119
GloGNN
actual #119 vs paper #123 4 places worse
0.6715 ±0.0192
best reported
actual #119 vs paper #123 4 places worse
paper 0.6574 ±0.0119

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.6574 ±0.0119 Δ at pub 0.0141
120
CPGNN
actual #120 vs paper #123 3 places worse
0.6709 ±0.0263
best reported
actual #120 vs paper #123 3 places worse
paper 0.6596 ±0.0195

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.6596 ±0.0195 Δ at pub 0.0113

GNNBenchmark

#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
Schrödinger
0.9913 ±0.0004
2
CNN
0.9907 ±0.0007
3
MPNN
0.9895 ±0.0006
11
GatedGCN
actual #11 vs paper #90 79 places worse
0.9855 ±0.0002
best reported
actual #11 vs paper #90 79 places worse
paper 0.9734 ±0.0014
paper 0.9734 ±0.0014 Δ at pub 0.0121
32
GIN
actual #32 vs paper #110 78 places worse
0.9833 ±0.0011
best reported
actual #32 vs paper #110 78 places worse
paper 0.9648 ±0.0025
best at pub: Graph-Coupled Oscillator Networks (ICML 2022)
paper 0.9648 ±0.0025 Δ at pub 0.0075 Δ today 0.0184
44
TANGO-GPS
0.9820 ±0.0011
This paper
47
EGT
0.9817 ±0.0009
This paper
56
GRIT
0.9811 ±0.0011
This paper
59
GPS
actual #59 vs paper #61 2 places worse
0.9808 ±0.0011
best reported
actual #59 vs paper #61 2 places worse
paper 0.9805 ±0.0013

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.9805 ±0.0013 Δ today 0.0003
74
CRaW1
0.9794 ±0.0005
This paper
75
PNA
0.9794 ±0.0012
This paper
80
TANGO-GatedGCN
0.9779 ±0.0010
This paper
86
GAT
actual #86 vs paper #121 35 places worse
0.9755 ±0.0003
best reported
actual #86 vs paper #121 35 places worse
paper 0.9554 ±0.0021
paper 0.9554 ±0.0021 Δ at pub 0.0202
95
GraphSAGE
0.9731 ±0.0010
126
MLP
0.9534 ±0.0014
135
GCN
actual #135 vs paper #138 3 places worse
0.9405 ±0.0005
best reported
actual #135 vs paper #138 3 places worse
paper 0.9071 ±0.0022
paper 0.9071 ±0.0022 Δ at pub 0.0335
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
RandAlign
0.7942 ±0.0007
2
differential encoding
0.7907 ±0.0027
3
PPGT
0.7856 ±0.0070
7
GRIT
0.7647 ±0.0088
This paper
13
TANGO-GPS
0.7578 ±0.0026
This paper
38
PNA
actual #38 vs paper #67 29 places worse
0.7311 ±0.0011
best reported
actual #38 vs paper #67 29 places worse
paper 0.7035 ±0.0063
paper 0.7035 ±0.0063 Δ at pub 0.0276
40
DGN
actual #40 vs paper #40
0.7284 ±0.0042
best reported
actual #40 vs paper #40
paper 0.7284 ±0.0042

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7284 ±0.0042 Δ at pub 0.0000
44
GIN-AK+
actual #44 vs paper #50 6 places worse
0.7239 ±0.0038
best reported
actual #44 vs paper #50 6 places worse
paper 0.7219 ±0.0013

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7219 ±0.0013 Δ at pub 0.0020
46
GPS
actual #46 vs paper #49 3 places worse
0.7236 ±0.0032
best reported
actual #46 vs paper #49 3 places worse
paper 0.7230 ±0.0036

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7230 ±0.0036 Δ today 0.0006
62
GatedGCN
actual #62 vs paper #90 28 places worse
0.7133 ±0.0039
best reported
actual #62 vs paper #90 28 places worse
paper 0.6731 ±0.0031
paper 0.6731 ±0.0031 Δ at pub 0.0402
64
TANGO-GatedGCN
0.7089 ±0.0033
This paper
81
CRaW1
0.6901 ±0.0026
This paper
82
EGT
0.6870 ±0.0041
This paper
92
GraphSAGE
0.6690 ±0.0020
101
GAT
actual #101 vs paper #112 11 places worse
0.6611 ±0.0098
best reported
actual #101 vs paper #112 11 places worse
paper 0.6422 ±0.0046
paper 0.6422 ±0.0046 Δ at pub 0.0189
109
GIN
actual #109 vs paper #129 20 places worse
0.6510 ±0.0050
best reported
actual #109 vs paper #129 20 places worse
paper 0.5525 ±0.0153
paper 0.5525 ±0.0153 Δ at pub 0.0985
124
GCN
actual #124 vs paper #128 4 places worse
0.5839 ±0.0073
best reported
actual #124 vs paper #128 4 places worse
paper 0.5571 ±0.0038
paper 0.5571 ±0.0038 Δ at pub 0.0268
126
MLP
0.5634 ±0.0018
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
GRPE-Small
0.8159 ±0.0019
2
TANGO-GPS
0.8011 ±0.0014
This paper
3
GRIT
0.8003 ±0.0028
This paper
6
EGT
0.7923 ±0.0035
This paper
16
TANGO-GatedGCN
0.7819 ±0.0031
This paper
22
GPS
0.7802 ±0.0018
This paper
50
SAN
0.7669 ±0.0065
This paper
54
GatedGCN
actual #54 vs paper #62 8 places worse
0.7608 ±0.0020
best reported
actual #54 vs paper #62 8 places worse
paper 0.7384 ±0.0033
paper 0.7384 ±0.0033 Δ at pub 0.0224
67
GAT
0.7059 ±0.0045
This paper
70
GCN
actual #70 vs paper #71 1 place worse
0.6903 ±0.0137
best reported
actual #70 vs paper #71 1 place worse
paper 0.6850 ±0.0098

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.6850 ±0.0098 Δ at pub 0.0053
79
GIN
0.6472 ±0.0155
This paper
80
GraphSAGE
0.6388 ±0.0011
114
MLP
0.2097 ±0.0000
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
DeepGraph (48)
0.9066 ±0.0006
2
GRIT (our run)
0.9041 ±0.0023
3
GRIT 2-QiQRW
0.9016 ±0.0045
6
GRIT
actual #6 vs paper #7 1 place worse
0.8722 ±0.0003
best reported
actual #6 vs paper #7 1 place worse
paper 0.8720 ±0.0008

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8720 ±0.0008 Δ at pub 0.0002
8
TANGO-GPS
0.8718 ±0.0006
This paper
19
GIN-AK+
0.8685 ±0.0006
This paper
24
EGT
0.8682 ±0.0002
This paper
50
GPS
0.8669 ±0.0006
This paper
51
DGN
0.8668 ±0.0003
This paper
53
TANGO-GatedGCN
0.8667 ±0.0007
This paper
58
SAN
0.8658 ±0.0004
This paper
66
GatedGCN
actual #66 vs paper #91 25 places worse
0.8651 ±0.0008
best reported
actual #66 vs paper #91 25 places worse
paper 0.8557 ±0.0009
best at pub: IJCAI--23 Formatting Instructions (IJCAI 2023)
paper 0.8557 ±0.0009 Δ at pub 0.0094
88
GCN
actual #88 vs paper #116 28 places worse
0.8561 ±0.0003
best reported
actual #88 vs paper #116 28 places worse
paper 0.7189 ±0.0033
paper 0.7189 ±0.0033 Δ at pub 0.1372
89
GIN
actual #89 vs paper #94 5 places worse
0.8559 ±0.0001
best reported
actual #89 vs paper #94 5 places worse
paper 0.8539 ±0.0014
best at pub: Factorizable Graph Convolutional Networks (NeurIPS 2020)
best today: GNNBenchmark (JMLR 2023)

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8539 ±0.0014 Δ at pub 0.0020 Δ today 0.0020
107
GAT
0.7827 ±0.0019
This paper
123
MLP
0.5052
124
GraphSAGE
0.5052 ±0.0000

Algorithmic Graph Tasks

#ModelMSE ↓Paper
1
TANGO-GPS
-5.5263 ±0.0838
This paper
2
TANGO-GatedGCN
-5.0626 ±0.0742
This paper
3
PH-DGN
-4.2993 ±0.0721
This paper
5
GPS
-3.5990 ±0.1949
This paper
7
SWAN
-3.5425 ±0.0830
This paper
8
GatedGCN
-3.2610 ±0.0514
This paper
10
A-DGN
-3.2417 ±0.0751
This paper
14
GraphCON
-1.3836 ±0.0092
This paper
15
GCNII
-1.1329 ±0.0135
This paper
16
GIN
-0.5408 ±0.4193
This paper
17
DGC
-0.1483 ±0.0231
This paper
18
GRAND
-0.0942 ±0.3897
This paper
19
GraphSAGE
0.2863 ±0.1843
This paper
20
GAT
0.6951 ±0.1499
This paper
21
GCN
0.9499 ±0.0001
This paper

Eccentricity

Global leaderboard →
Non-default metric. This paper reports log10(MSE); the dataset default is MSE. Values below use log10(MSE) only.

Sorted by log10(MSE). Highlighted rows are from other papers.

#Modellog10(MSE) ↓Paper
1
TANGO-GPS
-2.1455
This paper
2
TANGO-GatedGCN
-1.7419
This paper
3
PH-DGN
-0.9348
This paper
4
SWAN
-0.0739
This paper
SOTA performance (not significantly different from the best) Proposed method (this paper) Baseline / comparison (this paper) Global context (other papers) Best at pub — reported result worse than the best known when published (best reported in green) Best today — OK at publication; today's leaderboard best is elsewhere