Chimera: State Space Models Beyond Sequences
Abstract
Transformer-based deep learning methods have become the standard approach for modeling diverse data such as sequences, images, and graphs. These methods rely on self-attention, which treats data as an unordered set of elements. This ignores the neighborhood structure or graph topology of the data and requires inductive biases--such as position embeddings in sequences and images, or random walks in graphs--to incorporate topology. However, designing such task-specific biases requires significant effort and can introduce side effects that hinder generalization. We introduce Chimera, a unified model that directly incorporates data topology in a principled way, removing the need for domain-specific biases. The key idea is that state space models--which naturally do not require position embeddings--can be generalized to capture any graph topology. Our experiments show that Chimera achieves strong performance across language, vision, and graph domains, outperforming BERT on GLUE by 0.7 points, ViT on ImageNet-1k by 2.6%, and all baselines on the Long Range Graph Benchmark. We further propose algorithmic optimizations to improve Chimera's efficiency: (1) for Directed Acyclic Graphs, Chimera can be implemented as a linear-time recurrence; (2) for general graphs, a simple mathematical relaxation achieves Transformer's quadratic complexity without domain-specific heuristics. These results validate Chimera's core contribution and support the idea that data topology is a powerful inductive bias across modalities.
Benchmark Results
Tested on 4 datasets 2 baseline values reported too low
Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).
LRGB
| # | Model | MAE ↓ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GCN | 0.2421
±0.0016 best reported | best at pub: Can Classic GNNs Be Strong Baselines for Graph-level Tasks? Simple Architectures Meet Excellence (ICML 2025) best today: From Message-Passing to Linearized Graph Sequence Models (2026) |
| 2 | IPR-MPNN | 0.2422
±0.0007 | |
| 3 | TANGO-GPS | 0.2422
±0.0014 | |
| 5 | GIN | 0.2429
±0.0019 | |
| 11 | Chimera | 0.2433
±0.0006 | This paper |
| 37 | NeuralWalker | 0.2463
±0.0005 best reported | best today: From Message-Passing to Linearized Graph Sequence Models (2026) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 49 | GINE | 0.2473
±0.0017 | This paper |
| 61 | Gated-GCN | 0.2477
±0.0009 | This paper |
| 97 | GraphGPS+Transformer | 0.2509
±0.0014 | This paper |
| 168 | GPS + BigBird | 0.2842
±0.0130 | This paper |
| 201 | MLP | 0.4351
±0.0008 |
| # | Model | AP ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S^2GCN | 0.7311
±0.0066 | |
| 2 | S4G | 0.7293
±0.0004 | |
| 3 | BuNN | 0.7276
±0.0065 | |
| 4 | GCN | 0.7261
±0.0011 best reported | best at pub: Where Did the Gap Go? Reassessing the Long-Range Graph Benchmark (TMLR 2023) best today: From Message-Passing to Linearized Graph Sequence Models (2026) |
| 20 | NeuralWalker | 0.7096
±0.0078 | This paper |
| 26 | GIN | 0.7059
±0.0089 | |
| 31 | Chimera | 0.7021
±0.0030 | This paper |
| 59 | Gated-GCN | 0.6765
±0.0047 | This paper |
| 78 | GINE | 0.6621
±0.0067 | This paper |
| 84 | GraphGPS+Transformer | 0.6575
±0.0049 | This paper |
| 150 | GPS + BigBird | 0.5854
±0.0079 | This paper |
| 181 | MLP | 0.4060
±0.0021 |
| # | Model | F1 ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NeuralWalker | 0.4912
±0.0042 | This paper |
| 2 | PPGT | 0.4641
±0.0033 | |
| 3 | CRaWl | 0.4588
±0.0079 | |
| 13 | Chimera | 0.4460
±0.0070 | This paper |
| 15 | GraphGPS+Transformer | 0.4440
±0.0054 | This paper |
| 16 | Graph Mamba | 0.4393
±0.0112 | This paper |
| 42 | Gated-GCN | 0.3880
±0.0040 | This paper |
| 41 | GatedGCN | 0.3880
±0.0040 | |
| 74 | GPS + BigBird | 0.2762
±0.0069 | This paper |
| 75 | GINE | 0.2718
±0.0054 | This paper |
| 81 | GCN | 0.2380
±0.0160 best reported | best at pub: When Graph Neural Networks Meet Dynamic Mode Decomposition (ICLR 2024) |
| 93 | MLP | 0.1140
±0.0230 |
| # | Model | F1 ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FloydNet | 0.4901 | |
| 2 | CRaWl | 0.4588
±0.0079 | |
| 3 | GPS | 0.4440
±0.0065 | |
| 4 | NeuralWalker | 0.4398
±0.0033 | This paper |
| 7 | Chimera | 0.3977
±0.0160 | This paper |
| 9 | Graph Mamba | 0.3974
±0.0101 | This paper |
| 15 | GraphGPS+Transformer | 0.3884
±0.0055 | This paper |
| 16 | GatedGCN | 0.3880
±0.0040 | |
| 33 | Gated-GCN | 0.2922
±0.0018 | This paper |
| 34 | GINE | 0.2718
±0.0054 best reported | best at pub: Where Did the Gap Go? Reassessing the Long-Range Graph Benchmark (TMLR 2023) |
| 35 | GPS + BigBird | 0.2622
±0.0008 | This paper |
| 45 | GCN | 0.2078
±0.0031 best reported | best at pub: Where Did the Gap Go? Reassessing the Long-Range Graph Benchmark (TMLR 2023) |
| 74 | MLP | 0.0310
±0.0160 |
