Gauge-Equivariant Graph Networks via Self-Interference Cancellation

Y. Choi, Chong-Kwon Kim

Main figure for Gauge-Equivariant Graph Networks via Self-Interference Cancellation

Abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) excel on homophilous graphs but often fail under heterophily due to self-reinforcing and phase-inconsistent signals. We propose a Gauge-Equivariant Graph Network with Self-Interference Cancellation (GESC), which replaces additive aggregation with a projection-based interference mechanism. Unlike prior magnetic or gauge-equivariant GNNs that rely on additive message mixing, GESC explicitly models self-interference arising from redundant low-frequency components. We show that the absence of interference handling in existing gauge-based GNNs is a primary driver of oversmoothing under gauge transport. We introduce a $U(1)$ phase connection followed by a rank-1 projection that suppresses self-parallel components before attention, and a sign-aware gate that regulates negatively aligned neighbors. Across diverse graph benchmarks, GESC consistently outperforms recent state-of-the-art models while offering a unified, interference-aware view of message passing. Our code is available at this link.

Proposed method: GESC

Benchmark Results

Tested on 9 datasets 89 baseline values reported too low

Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).

Classic

#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
GraphSAGE+CNA
0.9418 ±0.0033
2
GCN+CNA
0.9366 ±0.0048
3
TransformerConv
0.9350 ±0.0058
21
GCN
actual #21 vs paper #578 557 places worse
0.9004
best reported
actual #21 vs paper #578 557 places worse
paper 0.8140 ±0.0071
paper 0.8140 ±0.0071 Δ at pub 0.0864
25
ACM-GCN
actual #25 vs paper #434 409 places worse
0.8975 ±0.0116
best reported
actual #25 vs paper #434 409 places worse
paper 0.8290 ±0.0070
best at pub: Language is All a Graph Needs (2023)
paper 0.8290 ±0.0070 Δ at pub 0.0685 Δ today 0.0685
39
SAGE
0.8911 ±0.0012
44
GAT
actual #44 vs paper #456 412 places worse
0.8897 ±0.0014
best reported
actual #44 vs paper #456 412 places worse
paper 0.8260 ±0.0055
45
GCNII
actual #45 vs paper #507 462 places worse
0.8893 ±0.0137
best reported
actual #45 vs paper #507 462 places worse
paper 0.8220 ±0.0064
best at pub: Language is All a Graph Needs (2023)
paper 0.8220 ±0.0064 Δ at pub 0.0673 Δ today 0.0673
50
FAGCN
actual #50 vs paper #439 389 places worse
0.8885 ±0.0136
best reported
actual #50 vs paper #439 389 places worse
paper 0.8280 ±0.0066
best at pub: Language is All a Graph Needs (2023)
paper 0.8280 ±0.0066 Δ at pub 0.0605 Δ today 0.0605
51
H2GCN
actual #51 vs paper #644 593 places worse
0.8882 ±0.0011
best reported
actual #51 vs paper #644 593 places worse
paper 0.8030 ±0.0052
77
GPRGNN
actual #77 vs paper #530 453 places worse
0.8826 ±0.0050
best reported
actual #77 vs paper #530 453 places worse
paper 0.8200 ±0.0059
88
GloGNN
actual #88 vs paper #434 346 places worse
0.8812 ±0.0040
best reported
actual #88 vs paper #434 346 places worse
paper 0.8290 ±0.0045
161
SIGN
actual #161 vs paper #472 311 places worse
0.8672 ±0.0137
best reported
actual #161 vs paper #472 311 places worse
paper 0.8240 ±0.0057
230
GESC
0.8490 ±0.0054
This paper
250
DirGNN
0.8460 ±0.0061
This paper
283
CGNN
actual #283 vs paper #307 24 places worse
0.8420 ±0.0100
best reported
actual #283 vs paper #307 24 places worse
paper 0.8390 ±0.0070
best at pub: Continuous Graph Neural Networks (ICML 2019)

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8390 ±0.0070 Δ at pub 0.0030
294
TFE-GNN
0.8410 ±0.0072
This paper
318
MagNet
0.8380 ±0.0056
This paper
385
PCNet
0.8340 ±0.0077
This paper
474
Auto-HeG
0.8240 ±0.0107
This paper
475
L2DGCN
0.8240 ±0.0099
This paper
724
MLP
0.7768
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
CNA
0.9575 ±0.0058
2
IS-GIB
0.9390 ±0.0187
3
EERM
0.9112 ±0.0145
32
GPRGNN
actual #32 vs paper #616 584 places worse
0.8102 ±0.0071
best reported
actual #32 vs paper #616 584 places worse
paper 0.7010 ±0.0091
paper 0.7010 ±0.0091 Δ at pub 0.1092
35
GAT
actual #35 vs paper #673 638 places worse
0.8080 ±0.0026
best reported
actual #35 vs paper #673 638 places worse
paper 0.6840 ±0.0083
paper 0.6840 ±0.0083 Δ at pub 0.1240
36
GCNII
actual #36 vs paper #694 658 places worse
0.8076 ±0.0030
best reported
actual #36 vs paper #694 658 places worse
paper 0.6780 ±0.0121
paper 0.6780 ±0.0121 Δ at pub 0.1296
44
GCN
actual #44 vs paper #701 657 places worse
0.8033 ±0.0088
best reported
actual #44 vs paper #701 657 places worse
paper 0.6750 ±0.0070
paper 0.6750 ±0.0070 Δ at pub 0.1283
60
FAGCN
actual #60 vs paper #596 536 places worse
0.7928 ±0.0170
best reported
actual #60 vs paper #596 536 places worse
paper 0.7040 ±0.0120
paper 0.7040 ±0.0120 Δ at pub 0.0888
61
GraphSAGE
0.7923 ±0.0053
102
GloGNN
actual #102 vs paper #561 459 places worse
0.7740 ±0.0170
best reported
actual #102 vs paper #561 459 places worse
paper 0.7090 ±0.0048
paper 0.7090 ±0.0048 Δ at pub 0.0650
111
H2GCN
actual #111 vs paper #670 559 places worse
0.7711 ±0.0157
best reported
actual #111 vs paper #670 559 places worse
paper 0.6850 ±0.0076
350
MLP
0.7289 ±0.0010
412
SIGN
actual #412 vs paper #668 256 places worse
0.7240 ±0.0080
best reported
actual #412 vs paper #668 256 places worse
paper 0.6860 ±0.0070
paper 0.6860 ±0.0070 Δ at pub 0.0380
449
GESC
0.7210 ±0.0051
This paper
484
TFE-GNN
0.7170 ±0.0114
This paper
507
DirGNN
actual #507 vs paper #507
0.7150 ±0.0088
actual #507 vs paper #507
paper 0.7150 ±0.0088
508
L2DGCN
0.7150 ±0.0047
This paper
571
PCNet
0.7080 ±0.0115
This paper
579
ACM-GCN
actual #579 vs paper #579
0.7070 ±0.0081
actual #579 vs paper #579
paper 0.7070 ±0.0081
paper 0.7070 ±0.0081 Δ at pub 0.0562
590
CGNN
actual #590 vs paper #590
0.7050 ±0.0123
actual #590 vs paper #590
paper 0.7050 ±0.0123
prev best: GRAND: Graph Neural Diffusion (ICML 2021)
paper 0.7050 ±0.0123 Δ at pub 0.0240
611
Auto-HeG
0.7020 ±0.0136
This paper
656
MagNet
actual #656 vs paper #656
0.6890 ±0.0067
actual #656 vs paper #656
paper 0.6890 ±0.0067
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
LGTL
0.9518 ±0.0011
2
MixHop (LO)
0.9513 ±0.0038
3
GraphSAGE (LO)
0.9511 ±0.0036
16
H2GCN
actual #16 vs paper #614 598 places worse
0.9361 ±0.0013
best reported
actual #16 vs paper #614 598 places worse
paper 0.7880 ±0.0037
18
GCN
actual #18 vs paper #504 486 places worse
0.9296 ±0.0015
best reported
actual #18 vs paper #504 486 places worse
paper 0.7950 ±0.0047
20
GAT
actual #20 vs paper #458 438 places worse
0.9233 ±0.0018
best reported
actual #20 vs paper #458 438 places worse
paper 0.7990 ±0.0045
41
ACM-GCN
actual #41 vs paper #447 406 places worse
0.9096 ±0.0062
best reported
actual #41 vs paper #447 406 places worse
paper 0.8000 ±0.0045
best at pub: Language is All a Graph Needs (2023)
paper 0.8000 ±0.0045 Δ at pub 0.1096
58
GCNII
actual #58 vs paper #524 466 places worse
0.9030 ±0.0043
best reported
actual #58 vs paper #524 466 places worse
paper 0.7940 ±0.0052
73
FAGCN
actual #73 vs paper #474 401 places worse
0.8998 ±0.0054
best reported
actual #73 vs paper #474 401 places worse
paper 0.7980 ±0.0055
best at pub: Language is All a Graph Needs (2023)
paper 0.7980 ±0.0055 Δ at pub 0.1018
85
GloGNN
actual #85 vs paper #418 333 places worse
0.8960 ±0.0040
best reported
actual #85 vs paper #418 333 places worse
paper 0.8030 ±0.0031
paper 0.8030 ±0.0031 Δ at pub 0.0930
101
GPRGNN
actual #101 vs paper #524 423 places worse
0.8911 ±0.0008
best reported
actual #101 vs paper #524 423 places worse
paper 0.7940 ±0.0057
paper 0.7940 ±0.0057 Δ at pub 0.0971
116
SAGE
0.8881 ±0.0015
210
MLP
0.8690 ±0.0074
413
GESC
0.8040 ±0.0010
This paper
421
TFE-GNN
0.8030 ±0.0030
This paper
431
DirGNN
0.8020 ±0.0043
This paper
430
CGNN
actual #430 vs paper #439 9 places worse
0.8020 ±0.0030
best reported
actual #430 vs paper #439 9 places worse
paper 0.8010 ±0.0051
best at pub: GRAND: Graph Neural Diffusion (ICML 2021)
best today: Framelet Message Passing (2023)

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8010 ±0.0051 Δ at pub 0.0010 Δ today 0.0010
441
MagNet
0.8010 ±0.0040
This paper
442
Auto-HeG
0.8010 ±0.0027
This paper
449
PCNet
0.8000 ±0.0029
This paper
475
L2DGCN
0.7980 ±0.0020
This paper
484
SIGN
actual #484 vs paper #484
0.7970 ±0.0043
actual #484 vs paper #484
paper 0.7970 ±0.0043

Improvement within reported uncertainty; not highlighted.

paper 0.7970 ±0.0043 Δ at pub 0.0020

Heterophilic Graphs

#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
P^2GNN
0.9672 ±0.0147
2
DoG
0.9660 ±0.0210
3
GPF-plus
0.9583 ±0.0419
5
ACM-GCN
actual #5 vs paper #432 427 places worse
0.9557 ±0.0360
best reported
actual #5 vs paper #432 427 places worse
paper 0.6590 ±0.0152
paper 0.6590 ±0.0152 Δ at pub 0.2920 Δ today 0.2967
28
GPRGNN
actual #28 vs paper #493 465 places worse
0.9295 ±0.0131
best reported
actual #28 vs paper #493 465 places worse
paper 0.6070 ±0.0128
paper 0.6070 ±0.0128 Δ at pub 0.3225
34
MLP
0.9230 ±0.0070
40
H2GCN
actual #40 vs paper #431 391 places worse
0.9189 ±0.0393
best reported
actual #40 vs paper #431 391 places worse
paper 0.6610 ±0.0127
paper 0.6610 ±0.0127 Δ at pub 0.2579
53
GraphSAGE
0.9000 ±0.0365
61
FAGCN
actual #61 vs paper #393 332 places worse
0.8961 ±0.0152
best reported
actual #61 vs paper #393 332 places worse
paper 0.6970 ±0.0141
paper 0.6970 ±0.0141 Δ at pub 0.1991
70
GCNII
actual #70 vs paper #401 331 places worse
0.8918 ±0.0443
best reported
actual #70 vs paper #401 331 places worse
paper 0.6910 ±0.0134
paper 0.6910 ±0.0134 Δ at pub 0.2008
89
PCNet
actual #89 vs paper #467 378 places worse
0.8811 ±0.0217
best reported
actual #89 vs paper #467 378 places worse
paper 0.6250 ±0.0116
paper 0.6250 ±0.0116 Δ at pub 0.2561
141
GloGNN
actual #141 vs paper #467 326 places worse
0.8524 ±0.0490
best reported
actual #141 vs paper #467 326 places worse
paper 0.6250 ±0.0121
paper 0.6250 ±0.0121 Δ at pub 0.2182 Δ today 0.2274
181
MagNet
actual #181 vs paper #439 258 places worse
0.8330 ±0.0610
best reported
actual #181 vs paper #439 258 places worse
paper 0.6530 ±0.0146
211
GAT
actual #211 vs paper #530 319 places worse
0.8162 ±0.0645
best reported
actual #211 vs paper #530 319 places worse
paper 0.5880 ±0.0101
paper 0.5880 ±0.0101 Δ at pub 0.2282
257
GCN
actual #257 vs paper #550 293 places worse
0.7933 ±0.0447
best reported
actual #257 vs paper #550 293 places worse
paper 0.5700 ±0.0090
best at pub: Graph Wave Networks (WWW 2025)
paper 0.5700 ±0.0090 Δ at pub 0.2233
295
L2DGCN
0.7670 ±0.0277
This paper
319
SIGN
actual #319 vs paper #530 211 places worse
0.7514 ±0.0794
best reported
actual #319 vs paper #530 211 places worse
paper 0.5880 ±0.0095
329
GESC
0.7450 ±0.0152
This paper
376
CGNN
actual #376 vs paper #385 9 places worse
0.7140 ±0.0410
best reported
actual #376 vs paper #385 9 places worse
paper 0.7030 ±0.0136

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7030 ±0.0136 Δ at pub 0.0110
403
DirGNN
0.6880 ±0.0157
This paper
418
Auto-HeG
0.6740 ±0.0165
This paper
453
TFE-GNN
actual #453 vs paper #453
0.6380 ±0.0111
actual #453 vs paper #453
paper 0.6380 ±0.0111
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
P^2GNN
0.9541 ±0.0272
2
ACM-GCN
actual #2 vs paper #428 426 places worse
0.9480 ±0.0380
best reported
actual #2 vs paper #428 426 places worse
paper 0.5510 ±0.0135
best at pub: Heterophily-informed Message Passing (TMLR 2025)
paper 0.5510 ±0.0135 Δ at pub 0.3970
3
RF-GCN
0.9429
22
GPRGNN
actual #22 vs paper #470 448 places worse
0.9157 ±0.0196
best reported
actual #22 vs paper #470 448 places worse
paper 0.5140 ±0.0136
paper 0.5140 ±0.0136 Δ at pub 0.4017
24
MLP
0.9136 ±0.0070
35
GCNII
actual #35 vs paper #424 389 places worse
0.8918 ±0.0396
best reported
actual #35 vs paper #424 389 places worse
paper 0.5600 ±0.0127
paper 0.5600 ±0.0127 Δ at pub 0.3170 Δ today 0.3318
38
FAGCN
actual #38 vs paper #418 380 places worse
0.8852 ±0.0133
best reported
actual #38 vs paper #418 380 places worse
paper 0.5680 ±0.0122
paper 0.5680 ±0.0122 Δ at pub 0.3172
68
H2GCN
actual #68 vs paper #428 360 places worse
0.8623 ±0.0471
best reported
actual #68 vs paper #428 360 places worse
paper 0.5500 ±0.0115
best at pub: Heterophily-informed Message Passing (TMLR 2025)
paper 0.5500 ±0.0115 Δ at pub 0.3120 Δ today 0.3123
74
GloGNN
actual #74 vs paper #499 425 places worse
0.8595 ±0.0510
best reported
actual #74 vs paper #499 425 places worse
paper 0.4880 ±0.0115
106
MagNet
actual #106 vs paper #428 322 places worse
0.8430 ±0.0700
best reported
actual #106 vs paper #428 322 places worse
paper 0.5510 ±0.0131
138
SAGE
0.8269
152
PCNet
actual #152 vs paper #437 285 places worse
0.8216 ±0.0270
best reported
actual #152 vs paper #437 285 places worse
paper 0.5410 ±0.0102
paper 0.5410 ±0.0102 Δ at pub 0.2806
158
GAT
actual #158 vs paper #545 387 places worse
0.8190 ±0.0540
best reported
actual #158 vs paper #545 387 places worse
paper 0.4260 ±0.0080
paper 0.4260 ±0.0080 Δ at pub 0.3930
170
GCN
actual #170 vs paper #553 383 places worse
0.8082 ±0.0360
best reported
actual #170 vs paper #553 383 places worse
paper 0.3990 ±0.0079
paper 0.3990 ±0.0079 Δ at pub 0.4092
180
DirGNN
actual #180 vs paper #405 225 places worse
0.8000 ±0.0360
best reported
actual #180 vs paper #405 225 places worse
paper 0.5790 ±0.0180
198
SIGN
actual #198 vs paper #547 349 places worse
0.7811 ±0.0467
best reported
actual #198 vs paper #547 349 places worse
paper 0.4240 ±0.0085
319
CGNN
actual #319 vs paper #411 92 places worse
0.6622 ±0.0769
best reported
actual #319 vs paper #411 92 places worse
paper 0.5740 ±0.0125

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.5740 ±0.0125 Δ at pub 0.0882 Δ today 0.0882
383
GESC
0.5940 ±0.0193
This paper
442
Auto-HeG
0.5390 ±0.0103
This paper
445
TFE-GNN
actual #445 vs paper #445
0.5370 ±0.0107
actual #445 vs paper #445
paper 0.5370 ±0.0107
470
L2DGCN
0.5150 ±0.0328
This paper
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
DiGGR
0.4535 ±0.0353
2
TRIGON
0.4402 ±0.0028
3
DoG
0.4320 ±0.0120
16
ACM-GCN
actual #16 vs paper #420 404 places worse
0.4198 ±0.0089
best reported
actual #16 vs paper #420 404 places worse
paper 0.2590 ±0.0102
paper 0.2590 ±0.0102 Δ at pub 0.1570 Δ today 0.1608
33
SIGN
actual #33 vs paper #461 428 places worse
0.4122 ±0.0096
best reported
actual #33 vs paper #461 428 places worse
paper 0.2260 ±0.0040
paper 0.2260 ±0.0040 Δ at pub 0.1862
38
GCNII
actual #38 vs paper #419 381 places worse
0.4082 ±0.0179
best reported
actual #38 vs paper #419 381 places worse
paper 0.2620 ±0.0122
paper 0.2620 ±0.0122 Δ at pub 0.1241 Δ today 0.1462
42
MLP
0.4026 ±0.0108
52
GPRGNN
actual #52 vs paper #433 381 places worse
0.3992 ±0.0067
best reported
actual #52 vs paper #433 381 places worse
paper 0.2520 ±0.0089
paper 0.2520 ±0.0089 Δ at pub 0.1472 Δ today 0.1472
56
FAGCN
actual #56 vs paper #411 355 places worse
0.3970
best reported
actual #56 vs paper #411 355 places worse
paper 0.2680 ±0.0124
paper 0.2680 ±0.0124 Δ at pub 0.1290
58
GloGNN
actual #58 vs paper #411 353 places worse
0.3959 ±0.0029
best reported
actual #58 vs paper #411 353 places worse
paper 0.2700 ±0.0073
paper 0.2700 ±0.0073 Δ at pub 0.1259
68
GraphSAGE
0.3899 ±0.0085
71
H2GCN
actual #71 vs paper #420 349 places worse
0.3885 ±0.0117
best reported
actual #71 vs paper #420 349 places worse
paper 0.2590 ±0.0107
paper 0.2590 ±0.0107 Δ at pub 0.1250 Δ today 0.1295
135
GCN
actual #135 vs paper #487 352 places worse
0.3690
best reported
actual #135 vs paper #487 352 places worse
paper 0.2030 ±0.0046
paper 0.2030 ±0.0046 Δ at pub 0.1660
182
GAT
actual #182 vs paper #460 278 places worse
0.3605 ±0.0035
best reported
actual #182 vs paper #460 278 places worse
paper 0.2280 ±0.0041
paper 0.2280 ±0.0041 Δ at pub 0.1325
189
CGNN
actual #189 vs paper #415 226 places worse
0.3595 ±0.0086
best reported
actual #189 vs paper #415 226 places worse
paper 0.2650 ±0.0117
paper 0.2650 ±0.0117 Δ at pub 0.0945 Δ today 0.0945
317
L2DGCN
0.3130 ±0.0035
This paper
318
MagNet
actual #318 vs paper #417 99 places worse
0.3126 ±0.0067
best reported
actual #318 vs paper #417 99 places worse
paper 0.2640 ±0.0097
paper 0.2640 ±0.0097 Δ at pub 0.0486
339
GESC
0.3040 ±0.0066
This paper
395
TFE-GNN
0.2810 ±0.0081
This paper
406
DirGNN
0.2750 ±0.0095
This paper
413
PCNet
0.2660 ±0.0090
This paper
416
Auto-HeG
0.2650 ±0.0099
This paper
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
Hetero-S (GAT 8-layer)
0.8693
2
Dir-GNN+CNA
0.8586 ±0.0180
3
GAT
actual #3 vs paper #167 164 places worse
0.8560
best reported
actual #3 vs paper #167 164 places worse
paper 0.5440 ±0.0084
paper 0.5440 ±0.0084 Δ at pub 0.3120
15
DirGNN
actual #15 vs paper #138 123 places worse
0.7974 ±0.0140
best reported
actual #15 vs paper #138 123 places worse
paper 0.5980 ±0.0145
paper 0.5980 ±0.0145 Δ at pub 0.1994
28
ACM-GCN
actual #28 vs paper #156 128 places worse
0.7476 ±0.0220
best reported
actual #28 vs paper #156 128 places worse
paper 0.5660 ±0.0140
paper 0.5660 ±0.0140 Δ at pub 0.1816
45
GloGNN
actual #45 vs paper #170 125 places worse
0.7133 ±0.0242
best reported
actual #45 vs paper #170 125 places worse
paper 0.5390 ±0.0070
paper 0.5390 ±0.0070 Δ at pub 0.1731 Δ today 0.1743
52
GCN
actual #52 vs paper #165 113 places worse
0.7033
best reported
actual #52 vs paper #165 113 places worse
paper 0.5490 ±0.0059
paper 0.5490 ±0.0059 Δ at pub 0.1543
72
GPRGNN
actual #72 vs paper #161 89 places worse
0.6748 ±0.0040
best reported
actual #72 vs paper #161 89 places worse
paper 0.5580 ±0.0081
paper 0.5580 ±0.0081 Δ at pub 0.1148 Δ today 0.1168
93
GESC
0.6500 ±0.0129
This paper
103
GCNII
actual #103 vs paper #170 67 places worse
0.6386 ±0.0304
best reported
actual #103 vs paper #170 67 places worse
paper 0.5400 ±0.0077
paper 0.5400 ±0.0077 Δ at pub 0.0986 Δ today 0.0986
107
FAGCN
actual #107 vs paper #166 59 places worse
0.6344 ±0.0205
best reported
actual #107 vs paper #166 59 places worse
paper 0.5480 ±0.0081
108
SAGE
0.6340 ±0.0300
130
SIGN
actual #130 vs paper #169 39 places worse
0.6048 ±0.0210
best reported
actual #130 vs paper #169 39 places worse
paper 0.5420 ±0.0080
133
H2GCN
actual #133 vs paper #172 39 places worse
0.6030 ±0.0231
best reported
actual #133 vs paper #172 39 places worse
paper 0.5310 ±0.0088
paper 0.5310 ±0.0088 Δ at pub 0.0720
136
TFE-GNN
0.6020 ±0.0161
This paper
143
CGNN
actual #143 vs paper #143
0.5910 ±0.0078
actual #143 vs paper #143
paper 0.5910 ±0.0078
paper 0.5910 ±0.0078 Δ at pub 0.1220
147
MagNet
actual #147 vs paper #156 9 places worse
0.5832 ±0.0287
best reported
actual #147 vs paper #156 9 places worse
paper 0.5690 ±0.0134

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.5690 ±0.0134 Δ at pub 0.0142
152
PCNet
0.5760 ±0.0165
This paper
168
Auto-HeG
0.5430 ±0.0133
This paper
169
MLP
0.5429
173
L2DGCN
0.5310 ±0.0037
This paper
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
IBG-NN
0.7763 ±0.0179
2
Dir-GNN+CNA
0.7747 ±0.0128
3
DHGNN
0.7684 ±0.0161
9
DirGNN
actual #9 vs paper #216 207 places worse
0.7513 ±0.0195
best reported
actual #9 vs paper #216 207 places worse
paper 0.3520 ±0.0113
paper 0.3520 ±0.0113 Δ at pub 0.3993
19
GloGNN
actual #19 vs paper #238 219 places worse
0.7121 ±0.0184
best reported
actual #19 vs paper #238 219 places worse
paper 0.3100 ±0.0082
paper 0.3100 ±0.0082 Δ at pub 0.4021
25
ACM-GCN
actual #25 vs paper #232 207 places worse
0.6740 ±0.0221
best reported
actual #25 vs paper #232 207 places worse
paper 0.3210 ±0.0105
paper 0.3210 ±0.0105 Δ at pub 0.3530
39
H2GCN
actual #39 vs paper #238 199 places worse
0.6190 ±0.0140
best reported
actual #39 vs paper #238 199 places worse
paper 0.3120 ±0.0068
paper 0.3120 ±0.0068 Δ at pub 0.3070
46
GCN
actual #46 vs paper #238 192 places worse
0.6067
best reported
actual #46 vs paper #238 192 places worse
paper 0.3110 ±0.0071
paper 0.3110 ±0.0071 Δ at pub 0.2957
67
GAT
actual #67 vs paper #238 171 places worse
0.5630 ±0.0220
best reported
actual #67 vs paper #238 171 places worse
paper 0.3100 ±0.0093
paper 0.3100 ±0.0093 Δ at pub 0.2530
76
GPRGNN
actual #76 vs paper #240 164 places worse
0.5435 ±0.0087
best reported
actual #76 vs paper #240 164 places worse
paper 0.3060 ±0.0063
paper 0.3060 ±0.0063 Δ at pub 0.2375
112
SIGN
actual #112 vs paper #238 126 places worse
0.4559 ±0.0140
best reported
actual #112 vs paper #238 126 places worse
paper 0.3120 ±0.0094
paper 0.3120 ±0.0094 Δ at pub 0.1439
120
SAGE
0.4460 ±0.0130
136
MagNet
actual #136 vs paper #232 96 places worse
0.4270 ±0.0150
best reported
actual #136 vs paper #232 96 places worse
paper 0.3240 ±0.0115
139
FAGCN
actual #139 vs paper #238 99 places worse
0.4259 ±0.0069
best reported
actual #139 vs paper #238 99 places worse
paper 0.3120 ±0.0087
172
MLP
0.3930 ±0.0079
176
GCNII
actual #176 vs paper #239 63 places worse
0.3881 ±0.0197
best reported
actual #176 vs paper #239 63 places worse
paper 0.3080 ±0.0091
paper 0.3080 ±0.0091 Δ at pub 0.0767 Δ today 0.0801
187
GESC
0.3790 ±0.0036
This paper
204
TFE-GNN
0.3600 ±0.0059
This paper
214
L2DGCN
0.3540 ±0.0052
This paper
228
CGNN
actual #228 vs paper #228
0.3440 ±0.0097
actual #228 vs paper #228
paper 0.3440 ±0.0097
paper 0.3440 ±0.0097 Δ at pub 0.0516
233
PCNet
0.3180 ±0.0058
This paper
235
Auto-HeG
0.3170 ±0.0111
This paper
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
DMD++
0.9190 ±0.0260
2
F-GREAD-BS
0.9059 ±0.0380
3
APPNP
0.9010 ±0.0350
5
GPRGNN
actual #5 vs paper #154 149 places worse
0.8990 ±0.0300
best reported
actual #5 vs paper #154 149 places worse
paper 0.6310 ±0.0121
paper 0.6310 ±0.0121 Δ at pub 0.2680
15
ACM-GCN
actual #15 vs paper #161 146 places worse
0.8843 ±0.0322
best reported
actual #15 vs paper #161 146 places worse
paper 0.6210 ±0.0145
paper 0.6210 ±0.0145 Δ at pub 0.2633 Δ today 0.2633
22
H2GCN
actual #22 vs paper #161 139 places worse
0.8790 ±0.0420
best reported
actual #22 vs paper #161 139 places worse
paper 0.6200 ±0.0125
paper 0.6200 ±0.0125 Δ at pub 0.2590
27
GloGNN
actual #27 vs paper #169 142 places worse
0.8706 ±0.0353
best reported
actual #27 vs paper #169 142 places worse
paper 0.6020 ±0.0112
paper 0.6020 ±0.0112 Δ at pub 0.2686 Δ today 0.2686
37
MLP
0.8629 ±0.0450
53
GAT
actual #53 vs paper #210 157 places worse
0.8430 ±0.0370
best reported
actual #53 vs paper #210 157 places worse
paper 0.5020 ±0.0097
paper 0.5020 ±0.0097 Δ at pub 0.3410
60
FAGCN
actual #60 vs paper #150 90 places worse
0.8333
best reported
actual #60 vs paper #150 90 places worse
paper 0.6430 ±0.0125
63
GCN
actual #63 vs paper #213 150 places worse
0.8310 ±0.0320
best reported
actual #63 vs paper #213 150 places worse
paper 0.4900 ±0.0078
paper 0.4900 ±0.0078 Δ at pub 0.3410
69
GraphSAGE
0.8118 ±0.0556
73
SIGN
actual #73 vs paper #210 137 places worse
0.8059 ±0.0375
best reported
actual #73 vs paper #210 137 places worse
paper 0.5040 ±0.0088
75
GCNII
actual #75 vs paper #152 77 places worse
0.8039 ±0.0340
best reported
actual #75 vs paper #152 77 places worse
paper 0.6390 ±0.0129
paper 0.6390 ±0.0129 Δ at pub 0.1649 Δ today 0.1649
110
CGNN
actual #110 vs paper #148 38 places worse
0.7431 ±0.0726
best reported
actual #110 vs paper #148 38 places worse
paper 0.6490 ±0.0122

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.6490 ±0.0122 Δ at pub 0.0941 Δ today 0.0941
142
GESC
0.6660 ±0.0214
This paper
147
L2DGCN
0.6580 ±0.0301
This paper
152
Auto-HeG
0.6400 ±0.0149
This paper
156
DirGNN
0.6300 ±0.0133
This paper
160
TFE-GNN
0.6250 ±0.0119
This paper
162
MagNet
0.6170 ±0.0154
This paper
168
PCNet
0.6050 ±0.0113
This paper
SOTA performance (not significantly different from the best) Proposed method (this paper) Baseline / comparison (this paper) Global context (other papers) Best at pub — reported result worse than the best known when published (best reported in green) Best at pub — reported value improved over the best known when published