Rethinking Federated Graph Foundation Models: A Graph-Language Alignment-based Approach
Abstract
Recent studies of federated graph foundational models (FedGFMs) break the idealized and untenable assumption of having centralized data storage to train graph foundation models, and accommodate the reality of distributed, privacy-restricted data silos. Despite their simplicity and intuition, existing studies that project aligned generalizable knowledge onto a discrete token space via vector-quantized backbones suffer from irreversible knowledge loss during the quantization process. In this context, we argue that reconciling the semantic-structural orthogonality and integrity between pre-trained language models (PLMs) and graph neural networks (GNNs) is paramount for developing effective FedGFMs while simultaneously mitigating the severe data heterogeneity and communication constraints inherent in distributed, resource-limited environments. To address these issues, we propose FedGALA (Federated Graph And Language Alignment), a framework that resolves graph-based semantic-structural orthogonality and integrity in federated settings by employing unsupervised contrastive learning to align GNNs and frozen PLMs within a continuous embedding space, thereby capturing robust, transferable general knowledge. Subsequently, FedGALA leverages a communication-efficient prompt tuning mechanism to steer these pre-aligned encoders and frozen PLMs, facilitating effective adaptation to diverse downstream tasks while circumventing the prohibitive overhead of full-parameter fine-tuning. The comprehensive experiments validate that FedGALA outperforms all competitive baselines across multi-domain datasets on multiple tasks with up to 14.37% performance improvement.
Benchmark Results
Tested on 2 datasets 14 baseline values reported too low
Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).
Classic
| # | Model | Accuracy ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GraphSAGE+CNA | 0.9418
±0.0033 | |
| 2 | GCN+CNA | 0.9366
±0.0048 | |
| 3 | TransformerConv | 0.9350
±0.0058 | |
| 21 | GCN | 0.9004 best reported | best at pub: Understanding Heterophily for Graph Neural Networks (ICML 2024) |
| 39 | SAGE | 0.8911
±0.0012 | |
| 44 | GAT | 0.8897
±0.0014 best reported | |
| 141 | GraphSAGE | 0.8708
±0.0085 best reported | best at pub: Large Language Model Meets Graph Neural Network in Knowledge Distillation (AAAI 2024) |
| 165 | GIN | 0.8660
±0.0091 best reported | best at pub: Large Language Model Meets Graph Neural Network in Knowledge Distillation (AAAI 2024) |
| 680 | OFA* | 0.7941 best reported | best at pub: Text-space Graph Foundation Models: Comprehensive Benchmarks and New Insights (NeurIPS 2024) |
| 724 | MLP | 0.7768 | |
| 749 | FedTAD | 0.7655
±0.0023 | This paper |
| 750 | MOON | 0.7643
±0.0026 | This paper |
| 751 | FedGTA | 0.7643
±0.0026 | This paper |
| 755 | FED-PUB | 0.7633
±0.0035 | This paper |
| 756 | FedSage | 0.7632
±0.0016 | This paper |
| 761 | FedAvg | 0.7576
±0.0019 | This paper |
| 778 | FGGP | 0.7473
±0.0017 | This paper |
| 783 | FGSSL | 0.7441
±0.0026 | This paper |
| 802 | Linear | 0.7237
±0.0033 | prev best: Fully-inductive Node Classification on Arbitrary Graphs (ICLR 2024) |
Knowledge Graphs
| # | Model | MRR ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FedSage | 0.8426
±0.0026 best reported | |
| 2 | FED-PUB | 0.8348
±0.0025 best reported | |
| 3 | FedAvg | 0.8252
±0.0023 best reported | |
| 4 | GAT | 0.8244
±0.0037 best reported | |
| 5 | MOON | 0.8231
±0.0025 best reported | |
| 6 | Linear | 0.8225
±0.0023 best reported | |
| 7 | GCN | 0.8171
±0.0030 best reported | |
| 8 | GraphSAGE | 0.8152
±0.0024 best reported | |
| 9 | GIN | 0.8124
±0.0055 best reported | |
| 10 | OFA* | 0.8000 | prev best: Quantizing Text-attributed Graphs for Semantic-Structural Integration (KDD 2025) |
