ICLR 2026

Enhancing Molecular Property Predictions by Learning from Bond Modelling and Interactions

Yunqing Liu, Yi Zhou, Wenqi Fan

Main figure for Enhancing Molecular Property Predictions by Learning from Bond Modelling and Interactions

Abstract

Molecule representation learning is crucial for understanding and predicting molecular properties. However, conventional atom-centric models, which treat chemical bonds merely as pairwise interactions, often overlook complex bond-level phenomena like resonance and stereoselectivity. This oversight limits their predictive accuracy for nuanced chemical behaviors. To address this limitation, we introduce DeMol, a dual-graph framework whose architecture is motivated by a rigorous information-theoretic analysis demonstrating the information gain from a bond-centric perspective. DeMol explicitly models molecules through parallel atom-centric and bond-centric channels. These are synergistically fused by multi-scale Double-Helix Blocks designed to learn intricate atom-atom, atom-bond, and bond-bond interactions. The framework's geometric consistency is further enhanced by a regularization term based on covalent radii to enforce chemically plausible structures. Comprehensive evaluations on diverse benchmarks, including PCQM4Mv2, OC20 IS2RE, QM9, and MoleculeNet, show that DeMol establishes a new state-of-the-art, outperforming existing methods. These results confirm the superiority of explicitly modelling bond information and interactions, paving the way for more robust and accurate molecular machine learning.

Proposed method: DeMol

Benchmark Results

Tested on 1 dataset 4 baseline values reported too low

Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).

OGB

#ModelMAE ↓Paper
1
DeMol
0.0603
This paper
2
TGT-At
0.0671
This paper
3
TGT-At (+RDKit)
0.0683
4
UniMol
0.0693
This paper
6
GPS
actual #6 vs paper #7 1 place worse
0.0720
best reported
actual #6 vs paper #7 1 place worse
paper 0.0778
7
Transformer-M
actual #7 vs paper #7
0.0772
actual #7 vs paper #7
paper 0.0772
9
GEM-2
actual #9 vs paper #9
0.0793
actual #9 vs paper #9
paper 0.0793
21
GraphGPS_DEEP
0.0852
This paper
25
GraphGPS_BASE
0.0858
This paper
29
EGT
actual #29 vs paper #33 4 places worse
0.0862
best reported
31
Graphormer
0.0864
This paper
33
GRPE_LARGE
0.0867
This paper
40
GRPE_BASE
0.0890
This paper
44
TokenGT
0.0910
This paper
52
GraphGPS_SMALL
0.0938
This paper
55
DeeperGCN-VN
0.1021
This paper
58
GIN-VN
0.1083
This paper
60
GCN-VN
actual #60 vs paper #61 1 place worse
0.1152
best reported
actual #60 vs paper #61 1 place worse
paper 0.1153
62
GINE-VN
0.1167
This paper
65
GCN
actual #65 vs paper #75 10 places worse
0.1195
best reported
actual #65 vs paper #75 10 places worse
paper 0.1379
paper 0.1379 Δ at pub 0.0184
64
GIN
0.1195
This paper
82
MLP-Fingerprint
actual #82 vs paper #82
0.1735
actual #82 vs paper #82
paper 0.1735
paper 0.1735 Δ at pub 0.0018
SOTA performance (not significantly different from the best) Proposed method (this paper) Baseline / comparison (this paper) Global context (other papers) Best at pub — reported result worse than the best known when published (best reported in green) Best at pub — reported value improved over the best known when published