SigGate-GT: Taming Over-Smoothing in Graph Transformers via Sigmoid-Gated Attention
Abstract
Graph transformers achieve strong results on molecular and long-range reasoning tasks, yet remain hampered by over-smoothing (the progressive collapse of node representations with depth) and attention entropy degeneration. We observe that these pathologies share a root cause with attention sinks in large language models: softmax attention's sum-to-one constraint forces every node to attend somewhere, even when no informative signal exists. Motivated by recent findings that element-wise sigmoid gating eliminates attention sinks in large language models, we propose SigGate-GT, a graph transformer that applies learned, per-head sigmoid gates to the attention output within the GraphGPS framework. Each gate can suppress activations toward zero, enabling heads to selectively silence uninformative connections. On five standard benchmarks, SigGate-GT matches the prior best on ZINC ($0.059$ MAE) and sets new state-of-the-art on ogbg-molhiv ($82.47\ statistically significant gains over GraphGPS across all five datasets ($p < 0.05$). Ablations show that gating reduces over-smoothing by $30\ attention entropy, and stabilizes training across a $10 $ learning rate range, with about $1\
Benchmark Results
Tested on 2 datasets
Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).
OGB
| # | Model | ROC-AUC ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Multi-RF Fusion with Multi-GNN Blending | 0.8476
±0.0002 | |
| 2 | HyperFusion | 0.8475
±0.0003 | |
| 3 | PAS+FPs | 0.8420
±0.0015 | |
| 4 | SigGate-GT | 0.8247
±0.0063 | This paper |
| 9 | GatedGCN | 0.8090
±0.0160 | |
| 10 | Exphormer | 0.8075
±0.0094 | This paper |
| 14 | Graphormer | 0.8051
±0.0053 | This paper |
| 62 | PNA | 0.7905
±0.0132 | This paper |
| 72 | GraphGPS | 0.7880
±0.0101 | This paper |
| 78 | DeeperGCN | 0.7860
±0.0120 best reported | best at pub: Wasserstein Embedding for Graph Learning (ICLR 2020) best today: Graph convolutions that can finally model local structure (2020) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 109 | GIN | 0.7780
±0.0182 | |
| 184 | GCN | 0.7630
±0.0030 best reported | best at pub: Motif-based Graph Representation Learning with Application to Chemical Molecules (2022) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| # | Model | AP ↑ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GRPE-Large | 0.3150
±0.0010 | |
| 2 | Graphormer | 0.3140 | |
| 3 | Graphormer-FLAG | 0.3139
±0.0032 | |
| 10 | SigGate-GT | 0.2984
±0.0031 | This paper |
| 26 | Exphormer | 0.2920
±0.0030 | This paper |
| 29 | GraphGPS | 0.2910
±0.0010 best reported | best today: Latent-Hysteresis Graph ODEs: Modeling Coupled Topology-Feature Evolution via Continuous Phase Transitions (2026) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 31 | GIN | 0.2902
±0.0017 | |
| 38 | PNA | 0.2838
±0.0035 | This paper |
| 47 | DeeperGCN | 0.2781
±0.0038 | This paper |
| 56 | GCN | 0.2690
±0.0020 best reported |
