Graph Hierarchical Recurrence for Long-Range Generalization
Abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Graph Transformers (GTs) are now a fundamental paradigm for graph learning, combining the representation-learning capabilities of deep models with the sample efficiency induced by their inductive biases. Despite their effectiveness, a large body of work has shown that these models still face fundamental limitations in tasks that require capturing correlations between distant regions of a graph. To address this issue, we introduce Graph Hierarchical Recurrence (GHR), a novel framework that operates jointly on the input graph and on a hierarchical abstraction obtained through pooling. We also show that the limitations of existing models are even more pronounced in out-of-range generalization, where test instances involve interactions over distances longer than those observed during training. By contrast, despite its simple design, GHR provides three key advantages: strong performance on long-range dependencies, improved out-of-range generalization, and high parameter efficiency. To corroborate these claims, we show that across a broad set of long-range benchmarks, GHR consistently outperforms existing graph models while using as little as 1% of the parameters of current state-of-the-art models. These results suggest a complementary direction to the current trend of scaling architectures to obtain graph foundation models, indicating that increased model capacity alone may not be sufficient for generalization.
Benchmark Results
Tested on 2 datasets
Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).
ECHO Benchmark
| # | Model | MAE ↓ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GHR | 0.0350
±0.0040 | This paper |
| 2 | GRIT | 0.1210
±0.0130 | This paper |
| 3 | GHR-GINE | 0.3790
±0.1910 | This paper |
| 4 | GPS | 0.4720
±0.0500 | This paper |
| 5 | SWAN | 0.8960
±0.2320 | This paper |
| 6 | A-DGN | 1.1510
±0.0380 | This paper |
| 7 | DRew | 1.2430
±0.0470 | This paper |
| 8 | PH-DGN | 1.3230
±0.4850 | This paper |
| 9 | GIN/GINE | 1.6300
±0.1610 | This paper |
| 10 | GIN | 1.6300
±0.1610 | |
| 11 | GCNII | 2.0050
±0.0930 | This paper |
| 12 | GCN | 2.1020
±0.0940 | This paper |
| 13 | GraphCON | 2.9690
±0.1890 | This paper |
LRIM Graph Benchmark
| # | Model | log-MSE ↓ | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPS-RWSE | -4.3450
±0.0650 | |
| 2 | GPS-Base | -4.3400
±0.1010 best reported | best at pub: From Message-Passing to Linearized Graph Sequence Models (2026) Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance. |
| 3 | GPS-LapPE | -4.3340
±0.0650 | prev best: From Message-Passing to Linearized Graph Sequence Models (2026) Improvement within reported uncertainty; not highlighted. |
| 5 | GHR-GatedGCN | -4.1950
±0.0610 | This paper |
| 6 | GatedGCN | -3.9190
±0.2230 | |
| 8 | GIN | -2.4060
±0.1480 |
