Graph Navier–Stokes Networks

Zexing Zhao, Guangsi Shi, Yu Gong, Tianyu Wang, Shirui Pan, Hongye Cheng, Yuxiao Li

Main figure for Graph Navier–Stokes Networks

Abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as a cornerstone of deep learning, with most existing methods rooted in graph signal processing and diffusion equations to model message passing. However, these approaches inherently suffer from the oversmoothing problem, where node features become indistinguishable as the network depth increases. Inspired by the Navier-Stokes equations, we introduce raph avier– tokes etworks (GNSN), a novel architecture that transcends conventional diffusion-based message passing by incorporating convection into graph structures. GNSN defines a dynamic velocity field on the graph to govern convection, enabling more efficient and direct message propagation. By adaptively balancing convection and diffusion, GNSN is able to efficiently handle datasets with varying levels of homophily. Extensive evaluations across twelve real-world datasets demonstrate that GNSN consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in classification accuracy. Moreover, experimental results further emphasize its effectiveness in alleviating the oversmoothing problem.

Proposed method: GNSN

Benchmark Results

Tested on 7 datasets 41 baseline values reported too low

Tables show presented results in global context (best 3 papers + GCN + MLP).

Classic

#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
GraphTARIF
0.9703 ±0.0019
2
GAT
actual #2 vs paper #503 501 places worse
0.9669 ±0.0014
best reported
actual #2 vs paper #503 501 places worse
paper 0.8570 ±0.0114
paper 0.8570 ±0.0114 Δ at pub 0.1099
3
GAT+T
0.9660 ±0.0007
7
SAGE
0.9643 ±0.0027
8
GCN
actual #8 vs paper #395 387 places worse
0.9632 ±0.0008
best reported
actual #8 vs paper #395 387 places worse
paper 0.9120 ±0.0120
paper 0.9120 ±0.0120 Δ at pub 0.0512
20
GRAND
actual #20 vs paper #308 288 places worse
0.9579 ±0.0059
best reported
actual #20 vs paper #308 288 places worse
paper 0.9230 ±0.0090
best at pub: Graph Wave Networks (WWW 2025)
paper 0.9230 ±0.0090 Δ at pub 0.0349
36
GNSN
0.9543 ±0.0126
This paper
56
GraphSAGE
actual #56 vs paper #378 322 places worse
0.9508 ±0.0026
best reported
actual #56 vs paper #378 322 places worse
paper 0.9140 ±0.0130
paper 0.9140 ±0.0130 Δ at pub 0.0368
82
CGNN
actual #82 vs paper #387 305 places worse
0.9435 ±0.0056
best reported
actual #82 vs paper #387 305 places worse
paper 0.9130 ±0.0150
best at pub: Graph Wave Networks (WWW 2025)
paper 0.9130 ±0.0150 Δ at pub 0.0305
137
PloyGCL
0.9360 ±0.0137
This paper
134
MixHop
actual #134 vs paper #134
0.9360 ±0.0137
actual #134 vs paper #134
paper 0.9360 ±0.0137
paper 0.9360 ±0.0137 Δ at pub 0.0415
143
MM-FGCN
0.9355 ±0.0168
This paper
212
FROND
0.9310 ±0.0150
This paper
265
GREAD
0.9265 ±0.0111
This paper
274
GRAFF
0.9259 ±0.0096
This paper
296
GDE
0.9240 ±0.0200
This paper
306
Geom-GCN
actual #306 vs paper #306
0.9235 ±0.0131
actual #306 vs paper #306
paper 0.9235 ±0.0131
358
ACMP
0.9180 ±0.0110
This paper
390
MLP
actual #390 vs paper #485 95 places worse
0.9128 ±0.0063
best reported
actual #390 vs paper #485 95 places worse
paper 0.8845 ±0.0057
paper 0.8845 ±0.0057 Δ at pub 0.0283
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
GraphTARIF
0.9461 ±0.0017
2
GCN
actual #2 vs paper #389 387 places worse
0.9412 ±0.0008
best reported
actual #2 vs paper #389 387 places worse
paper 0.8260 ±0.0240
paper 0.8260 ±0.0240 Δ at pub 0.1152
3
GAT
actual #3 vs paper #442 439 places worse
0.9398 ±0.0022
best reported
actual #3 vs paper #442 439 places worse
paper 0.7800 ±0.0095
paper 0.7800 ±0.0095 Δ at pub 0.1598
8
SAGE
0.9351 ±0.0006
46
GraphSAGE
actual #46 vs paper #390 344 places worse
0.9120 ±0.0029
best reported
actual #46 vs paper #390 344 places worse
paper 0.8240 ±0.0180
paper 0.8240 ±0.0180 Δ at pub 0.0880 Δ today 0.0880
144
GRAND
actual #144 vs paper #294 150 places worse
0.8937 ±0.0041
best reported
actual #144 vs paper #294 150 places worse
paper 0.8573 ±0.0050
best at pub: Graph Wave Networks (WWW 2025)
paper 0.8573 ±0.0050 Δ at pub 0.0364
195
CGNN
actual #195 vs paper #428 233 places worse
0.8831 ±0.0065
best reported
actual #195 vs paper #428 233 places worse
paper 0.8020 ±0.0420
best at pub: Graph Wave Networks (WWW 2025)
paper 0.8020 ±0.0420 Δ at pub 0.0811
203
GNSN
0.8813 ±0.0122
This paper
257
BLEND
0.8690 ±0.0060
This paper
302
GAT-ppr 3
0.8540 ±0.0010
This paper
320
MLP
0.8463
333
FROND
0.8440 ±0.0150
This paper
334
ACMP
0.8440 ±0.0160
This paper
367
MoNet
0.8350 ±0.0220
This paper
385
GDE
0.8290 ±0.0060
This paper
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
DoG
0.9690 ±0.0030
2
GWN-fa
0.9667 ±0.0026
3
GWN-sym
0.9666 ±0.0026
4
CGNN
actual #4 vs paper #107 103 places worse
0.9621 ±0.0032
best reported
actual #4 vs paper #107 103 places worse
paper 0.9230 ±0.0020
best at pub: Graph Wave Networks (WWW 2025)
paper 0.9230 ±0.0020 Δ at pub 0.0391
6
GraphSAGE
actual #6 vs paper #139 133 places worse
0.9593 ±0.0025
best reported
actual #6 vs paper #139 133 places worse
paper 0.9130 ±0.0480
best at pub: Graph Wave Networks (WWW 2025)

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.9130 ±0.0480 Δ at pub 0.0463
10
GRAND
actual #10 vs paper #82 72 places worse
0.9577 ±0.0028
best reported
actual #10 vs paper #82 72 places worse
paper 0.9290 ±0.0040
best at pub: Graph Wave Networks (WWW 2025)
paper 0.9290 ±0.0040 Δ at pub 0.0287
12
GCN
actual #12 vs paper #148 136 places worse
0.9514 ±0.0025
best reported
actual #12 vs paper #148 136 places worse
paper 0.9110 ±0.0050
best at pub: Graph Wave Networks (WWW 2025)
paper 0.9110 ±0.0050 Δ at pub 0.0404
21
GAT
actual #21 vs paper #156 135 places worse
0.9437 ±0.0028
best reported
actual #21 vs paper #156 135 places worse
paper 0.9050 ±0.0060
best at pub: Graph Wave Networks (WWW 2025)
paper 0.9050 ±0.0060 Δ at pub 0.0387
54
GNSN
0.9331 ±0.0065
This paper
71
FROND
0.9300 ±0.0090
This paper
72
ACMP
0.9300 ±0.0050
This paper
84
BLEND
0.9290 ±0.0020
This paper
88
MLP
0.9280 ±0.0020
135
GDE
0.9160 ±0.0010
This paper
138
GIN
0.9140 ±0.0020
145
GAT-ppr 3
0.9130 ±0.0010
This paper
155
MoNet
actual #155 vs paper #155
0.9082 ±0.0160
best reported
actual #155 vs paper #155
paper 0.9080 ±0.0060

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.9080 ±0.0060 Δ at pub 0.0002

Heterophilic Graphs

#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
P^2GNN
0.9672 ±0.0147
2
DoG
0.9660 ±0.0210
3
GPF-plus
0.9583 ±0.0419
5
ACM-GCN
actual #5 vs paper #91 86 places worse
0.9557 ±0.0360
best reported
actual #5 vs paper #91 86 places worse
paper 0.8784 ±0.0440
paper 0.8784 ±0.0440 Δ at pub 0.0773
30
GPR-GNN
actual #30 vs paper #269 239 places worse
0.9291 ±0.0132
best reported
actual #30 vs paper #269 239 places worse
paper 0.7838 ±0.0436
paper 0.7838 ±0.0436 Δ at pub 0.1453
34
MLP
actual #34 vs paper #230 196 places worse
0.9230 ±0.0070
best reported
actual #34 vs paper #230 196 places worse
paper 0.8081 ±0.0475
39
GGCN
actual #39 vs paper #148 109 places worse
0.9213 ±0.0305
best reported
actual #39 vs paper #148 109 places worse
paper 0.8486 ±0.0455
best at pub: Graph Wave Networks (WWW 2025)
paper 0.8486 ±0.0455 Δ at pub 0.0727
42
GNSN
0.9189 ±0.0295
This paper
40
H2GCN
actual #40 vs paper #148 108 places worse
0.9189 ±0.0393
best reported
actual #40 vs paper #148 108 places worse
paper 0.8486 ±0.0723

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8486 ±0.0723 Δ at pub 0.0703
53
GraphSAGE
actual #53 vs paper #193 140 places worse
0.9000 ±0.0365
best reported
actual #53 vs paper #193 140 places worse
paper 0.8243 ±0.0614

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8243 ±0.0614 Δ at pub 0.0757 Δ today 0.0757
57
GREAD
actual #57 vs paper #74 17 places worse
0.8973 ±0.0449
best reported
actual #57 vs paper #74 17 places worse
paper 0.8892 ±0.0372

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8892 ±0.0372 Δ at pub 0.0081
70
GCNII
actual #70 vs paper #280 210 places worse
0.8918 ±0.0443
best reported
actual #70 vs paper #280 210 places worse
paper 0.7757 ±0.0383
paper 0.7757 ±0.0383 Δ at pub 0.1161
82
GRAFF
0.8838 ±0.0353
This paper
91
PloyGCL
0.8803 ±0.0180
This paper
104
WRGAT
actual #104 vs paper #173 69 places worse
0.8698
best reported
actual #104 vs paper #173 69 places worse
paper 0.8362 ±0.0550

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8362 ±0.0550 Δ at pub 0.0336
110
ChebNet
actual #110 vs paper #272 162 places worse
0.8628 ±0.0262
best reported
actual #110 vs paper #272 162 places worse
paper 0.7837 ±0.0604

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7837 ±0.0604 Δ at pub 0.0791 Δ today 0.0791
116
ACMP
0.8620 ±0.0300
This paper
119
MM-FGCN
0.8610 ±0.0450
This paper
139
GCON
0.8540 ±0.0420
This paper
141
GloGNN
actual #141 vs paper #164 23 places worse
0.8524 ±0.0490
best reported
actual #141 vs paper #164 23 places worse
paper 0.8432 ±0.0415

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8432 ±0.0415 Δ at pub 0.0092
189
SAGE
0.8269
194
FA-GCN
0.8243 ±0.0689
This paper
211
GAT
actual #211 vs paper #576 365 places worse
0.8162 ±0.0645
best reported
actual #211 vs paper #576 365 places worse
paper 0.5216 ±0.0663
paper 0.5216 ±0.0663 Δ at pub 0.2946
217
GRAND
actual #217 vs paper #308 91 places worse
0.8140 ±0.0350
best reported
actual #217 vs paper #308 91 places worse
paper 0.7568 ±0.0125
paper 0.7568 ±0.0125 Δ at pub 0.0572
246
GPN
0.7995 ±0.0562
This paper
257
GCN
actual #257 vs paper #568 311 places worse
0.7933 ±0.0447
best reported
actual #257 vs paper #568 311 places worse
paper 0.5514 ±0.0516
best at pub: Graph Wave Networks (WWW 2025)
paper 0.5514 ±0.0516 Δ at pub 0.2419
276
MixHop
0.7784 ±0.0773
This paper
314
FROND
0.7556 ±0.0515
This paper
327
LINX
0.7460 ±0.0333
This paper
330
SGC
actual #330 vs paper #537 207 places worse
0.7440 ±0.0600
best reported
actual #330 vs paper #537 207 places worse
paper 0.5810 ±0.0420
paper 0.5810 ±0.0420 Δ at pub 0.1630
339
GDE
actual #339 vs paper #339
0.7410 ±0.0690
best reported
actual #339 vs paper #339
paper 0.7405 ±0.0696

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7405 ±0.0696 Δ at pub 0.0005
376
CGNN
actual #376 vs paper #378 2 places worse
0.7140 ±0.0410
best reported
actual #376 vs paper #378 2 places worse
paper 0.7135 ±0.0405

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7135 ±0.0405 Δ at pub 0.0005
392
JKNet
actual #392 vs paper #462 70 places worse
0.7000 ±0.0549
best reported
actual #392 vs paper #462 70 places worse
paper 0.6270 ±0.0834

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.6270 ±0.0834 Δ at pub 0.0730
415
Geom-GCN
actual #415 vs paper #425 10 places worse
0.6760
best reported
actual #415 vs paper #425 10 places worse
paper 0.6676 ±0.0272

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.6676 ±0.0272 Δ at pub 0.0084
499
PairNorm
actual #499 vs paper #499
0.6030 ±0.0430
best reported
actual #499 vs paper #499
paper 0.6027 ±0.0434
best at pub: Graph-Coupled Oscillator Networks (ICML 2022)

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.6027 ±0.0434 Δ at pub 0.0003 Δ today 0.0003
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
P^2GNN
0.9541 ±0.0272
2
ACM-GCN
actual #2 vs paper #87 85 places worse
0.9480 ±0.0380
best reported
actual #2 vs paper #87 85 places worse
paper 0.8514 ±0.0607
best at pub: Heterophily-informed Message Passing (TMLR 2025)
paper 0.8514 ±0.0607 Δ at pub 0.0966
3
RF-GCN
0.9429
11
GPR-GNN
actual #11 vs paper #177 166 places worse
0.9279 ±0.0312
best reported
actual #11 vs paper #177 166 places worse
paper 0.8027 ±0.0811
paper 0.8027 ±0.0811 Δ at pub 0.1252
15
GGCN
actual #15 vs paper #79 64 places worse
0.9230 ±0.0367
best reported
actual #15 vs paper #79 64 places worse
paper 0.8568 ±0.0663

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8568 ±0.0663 Δ at pub 0.0662
24
MLP
actual #24 vs paper #158 134 places worse
0.9136 ±0.0070
best reported
actual #24 vs paper #158 134 places worse
paper 0.8189 ±0.0640

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8189 ±0.0640 Δ at pub 0.0947
34
GNSN
0.8919 ±0.0513
This paper
35
GCNII
actual #35 vs paper #203 168 places worse
0.8918 ±0.0396
best reported
actual #35 vs paper #203 168 places worse
paper 0.7786 ±0.0379
paper 0.7786 ±0.0379 Δ at pub 0.1132
36
MM-FGCN
0.8890 ±0.0830
This paper
52
GREAD
0.8703 ±0.0495
This paper
68
H2GCN
actual #68 vs paper #136 68 places worse
0.8623 ±0.0471
best reported
actual #68 vs paper #136 68 places worse
paper 0.8270 ±0.0528

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8270 ±0.0528 Δ at pub 0.0353
74
GloGNN
actual #74 vs paper #119 45 places worse
0.8595 ±0.0510
best reported
actual #74 vs paper #119 45 places worse
paper 0.8351 ±0.0426

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8351 ±0.0426 Δ at pub 0.0244 Δ today 0.0244
84
ACMP
0.8540 ±0.0700
This paper
85
ChebNet
actual #85 vs paper #223 138 places worse
0.8533 ±0.0104
best reported
actual #85 vs paper #223 138 places worse
paper 0.7568 ±0.0694

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7568 ±0.0694 Δ at pub 0.0965
109
GCON
0.8430 ±0.0480
This paper
112
GRAFF
actual #112 vs paper #127 15 places worse
0.8405 ±0.0610
best reported
actual #112 vs paper #127 15 places worse
paper 0.8324 ±0.0649

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8324 ±0.0649 Δ at pub 0.0081 Δ today 0.0081
138
SAGE
0.8269
140
PloyGCL
0.8262 ±0.0311
This paper
142
GRAND
actual #142 vs paper #142
0.8246 ±0.0709
actual #142 vs paper #142
paper 0.8246 ±0.0709

Improvement within reported uncertainty; not highlighted.

paper 0.8246 ±0.0709 Δ at pub 0.0026
143
GDE
actual #143 vs paper #143
0.8243 ±0.0707
actual #143 vs paper #143
paper 0.8243 ±0.0707

Improvement within reported uncertainty; not highlighted.

paper 0.8243 ±0.0707 Δ at pub 0.0003
157
GraphSAGE
actual #157 vs paper #222 65 places worse
0.8196 ±0.0739
best reported
actual #157 vs paper #222 65 places worse
paper 0.7595 ±0.0501

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7595 ±0.0501 Δ at pub 0.0601
158
GAT
actual #158 vs paper #358 200 places worse
0.8190 ±0.0540
best reported
actual #158 vs paper #358 200 places worse
paper 0.6189 ±0.0505
paper 0.6189 ±0.0505 Δ at pub 0.2001
160
WRGAT
0.8162 ±0.0390
This paper
170
GCN
actual #170 vs paper #372 202 places worse
0.8082 ±0.0360
best reported
actual #170 vs paper #372 202 places worse
paper 0.6054 ±0.0530
paper 0.6054 ±0.0530 Δ at pub 0.2028
183
MixHop
actual #183 vs paper #249 66 places worse
0.7950 ±0.0630
best reported
actual #183 vs paper #249 66 places worse
paper 0.7351 ±0.0634

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7351 ±0.0634 Δ at pub 0.0599
186
FA-GCN
0.7919 ±0.0979
This paper
202
GPN
0.7793 ±0.0593
This paper
204
LINX
0.7784 ±0.0581
This paper
228
FROND
0.7536 ±0.0619
This paper
241
JKNet
actual #241 vs paper #377 136 places worse
0.7443 ±0.0830
best reported
actual #241 vs paper #377 136 places worse
paper 0.5972 ±0.0460
paper 0.5972 ±0.0460 Δ at pub 0.1471
252
SGC
actual #252 vs paper #375 123 places worse
0.7350 ±0.0430
best reported
actual #252 vs paper #375 123 places worse
paper 0.6000 ±0.0359
paper 0.6000 ±0.0359 Δ at pub 0.1350
319
CGNN
0.6622 ±0.0769
This paper
342
Geom-GCN
actual #342 vs paper #372 30 places worse
0.6412
best reported
actual #342 vs paper #372 30 places worse
paper 0.6054 ±0.0367

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.6054 ±0.0367 Δ at pub 0.0358
389
PairNorm
0.5892 ±0.0315
This paper
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
DiGGR
0.4535 ±0.0353
2
TRIGON
0.4402 ±0.0028
3
DoG
0.4320 ±0.0120
16
ACM-GCN
actual #16 vs paper #173 157 places worse
0.4198 ±0.0089
best reported
actual #16 vs paper #173 157 places worse
paper 0.3628 ±0.0109
paper 0.3628 ±0.0109 Δ at pub 0.0570
42
MLP
0.4026 ±0.0108
58
GloGNN
actual #58 vs paper #116 58 places worse
0.3959 ±0.0029
best reported
actual #58 vs paper #116 58 places worse
paper 0.3735 ±0.0130
paper 0.3735 ±0.0130 Δ at pub 0.0224
62
GGCN
actual #62 vs paper #113 51 places worse
0.3929 ±0.0048
best reported
actual #62 vs paper #113 51 places worse
paper 0.3754 ±0.0156

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.3754 ±0.0156 Δ at pub 0.0175
68
GraphSAGE
0.3899 ±0.0085
70
GNSN
0.3888 ±0.0082
This paper
71
H2GCN
actual #71 vs paper #198 127 places worse
0.3885 ±0.0117
best reported
actual #71 vs paper #198 127 places worse
paper 0.3570 ±0.0100
paper 0.3570 ±0.0100 Δ at pub 0.0315
87
Geom-GCN
actual #87 vs paper #308 221 places worse
0.3810
best reported
actual #87 vs paper #308 221 places worse
paper 0.3159 ±0.0115
paper 0.3159 ±0.0115 Δ at pub 0.0651
96
GREAD
0.3790 ±0.0117
This paper
102
Sheaf
0.3781 ±0.0115
This paper
129
GRAFF
actual #129 vs paper #181 52 places worse
0.3711 ±0.0108
best reported
actual #129 vs paper #181 52 places worse
paper 0.3609 ±0.0081

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.3609 ±0.0081 Δ at pub 0.0102 Δ today 0.0102
181
LINX
0.3610 ±0.0155
This paper
201
BLEND
0.3563 ±0.0101
This paper
203
GRAND
0.3562 ±0.0101
This paper
#ModelAccuracy ↑Paper
1
DMD++
0.9190 ±0.0260
2
F-GREAD-BS
0.9059 ±0.0380
3
APPNP
0.9010 ±0.0350
4
GNSN
0.9002 ±0.0194
This paper
9
GREAD
0.8941 ±0.0130
This paper
13
GRAND
actual #13 vs paper #80 67 places worse
0.8860 ±0.0210
best reported
actual #13 vs paper #80 67 places worse
paper 0.7941 ±0.0412
paper 0.7941 ±0.0412 Δ at pub 0.0919
14
MM-FGCN
0.8850 ±0.0410
This paper
15
ACM-GCN
0.8843 ±0.0322
This paper
22
H2GCN
actual #22 vs paper #23 1 place worse
0.8790 ±0.0420
best reported
actual #22 vs paper #23 1 place worse
paper 0.8765 ±0.0498

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8765 ±0.0498 Δ at pub 0.0025
23
GCON
0.8780 ±0.0330
This paper
24
GRAFF
0.8745 ±0.0294
This paper
27
GloGNN
0.8706 ±0.0353
This paper
29
WRGAT
0.8698 ±0.0378
This paper
32
GGCN
actual #32 vs paper #33 1 place worse
0.8686 ±0.0320
best reported
actual #32 vs paper #33 1 place worse
paper 0.8683 ±0.0329

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8683 ±0.0329 Δ at pub 0.0003 Δ today 0.0003
37
MLP
actual #37 vs paper #42 5 places worse
0.8629 ±0.0450
best reported
actual #37 vs paper #42 5 places worse
paper 0.8529 ±0.0331

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8529 ±0.0331 Δ at pub 0.0100
38
ACMP
0.8610 ±0.0400
This paper
42
PloyGCL
0.8550 ±0.0188
This paper
53
GAT
actual #53 vs paper #213 160 places worse
0.8430 ±0.0370
best reported
actual #53 vs paper #213 160 places worse
paper 0.4941 ±0.0409
paper 0.4941 ±0.0409 Δ at pub 0.3489
56
GPR-GNN
actual #56 vs paper #64 8 places worse
0.8412
best reported
actual #56 vs paper #64 8 places worse
paper 0.8294 ±0.0421

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.8294 ±0.0421 Δ at pub 0.0118
63
GCN
actual #63 vs paper #205 142 places worse
0.8310 ±0.0320
best reported
actual #63 vs paper #205 142 places worse
paper 0.5176 ±0.0306
paper 0.5176 ±0.0306 Δ at pub 0.3134
65
FA-GCN
0.8294 ±0.0795
This paper
67
GPN
0.8129 ±0.0509
This paper
69
GraphSAGE
0.8118 ±0.0556
This paper
75
GCNII
0.8039 ±0.0340
This paper
76
MixHop
actual #76 vs paper #96 20 places worse
0.8039
best reported
actual #76 vs paper #96 20 places worse
paper 0.7588 ±0.0490

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.7588 ±0.0490 Δ at pub 0.0451
80
GDE
0.7980 ±0.0562
This paper
85
ChebNet
actual #85 vs paper #85
0.7902 ±0.0318
actual #85 vs paper #85
paper 0.7902 ±0.0318
paper 0.7902 ±0.0318 Δ at pub 0.0804
86
GIN
0.7900 ±0.0060
90
FROND
0.7795 ±0.0675
This paper
91
SGC
actual #91 vs paper #187 96 places worse
0.7780 ±0.0470
best reported
actual #91 vs paper #187 96 places worse
paper 0.5529 ±0.0428
paper 0.5529 ±0.0428 Δ at pub 0.2251
98
LINX
0.7549 ±0.0572
This paper
110
CGNN
0.7431 ±0.0726
This paper
139
Geom-GCN
actual #139 vs paper #149 10 places worse
0.6757
best reported
actual #139 vs paper #149 10 places worse
paper 0.6451 ±0.0366

Difference within reported uncertainty; not counted as underperformance.

paper 0.6451 ±0.0366 Δ at pub 0.0306
166
JKNet
actual #166 vs paper #196 30 places worse
0.6098 ±0.0297
best reported
actual #166 vs paper #196 30 places worse
paper 0.5314 ±0.0522
paper 0.5314 ±0.0522 Δ at pub 0.0784
169
PairNorm
actual #169 vs paper #214 45 places worse
0.6027
best reported
actual #169 vs paper #214 45 places worse
paper 0.4843 ±0.0614
paper 0.4843 ±0.0614 Δ at pub 0.1184
SOTA performance (not significantly different from the best) Proposed method (this paper) Baseline / comparison (this paper) Global context (other papers) Best at pub — reported result worse than the best known when published (best reported in green) Best at pub — reported value improved over the best known when published